IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7809-d1473521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Ejectors Plant Technology for Sediment By-Pass in Harbours and Ports

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Pellegrini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research in Renewable Resources, Environment, Sea and Energy, University of Bologna, 48123 Ravenna, Italy)

  • Cesare Saccani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alessandro Guzzini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research in Renewable Resources, Environment, Sea and Energy, University of Bologna, 48123 Ravenna, Italy)

Abstract

Sedimentation is the natural process of sediment transportation and deposition in quiescent water conditions. Sedimentation can affect the functionality of ports, harbours and navigation channels by reducing water depth, making navigation difficult, if not impossible. Different solutions are available to guarantee infrastructure functionality against sedimentation, with maintenance dredging being the most widely adopted. Alternative technologies for dredging have been developed and tested to reduce the environmental concerns related to dredging operations. Among other solutions, applying a sediment by-pass system based on a jet pump emerged as one of the most promising. While the existing literature covers the techno-economic aspects of sediment by-pass systems, the environmental impacts must be better evaluated and assessed. This paper aims to resolve this gap by evaluating, through the ReCiPe2016 life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, the environmental impact of an innovative sediment by-pass system called an “ejectors plant”. The LCA results are based on the demonstrator established in Cervia Harbour in Italy, which was extensively monitored for 15 months during its operation. This paper shows how energy consumption during the operation phase highly affects the considered midpoint and endpoint categories. For example, the GWP100 of the ejectors plant, considering the Italian electricity mix, equals 1.75 million tons of equivalent CO 2 over 20 years, while under a low-carbon scenario, it is reduced to 0.17. In that case, material consumption in the construction phase becomes dominant, thus highlighting the importance of eco-innovation of ejectors plants to minimise oxidant formation. Finally, this paper compares the ejectors plant and traditional dredging through environmental LCA. The ejectors plant had a lower impact in all categories except for GWP-related categories. The sensitivity analysis showed how such a conclusion may be mitigated by considering different electricity mixes and maintenance dredging working cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Pellegrini & Cesare Saccani & Alessandro Guzzini, 2024. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Innovative Ejectors Plant Technology for Sediment By-Pass in Harbours and Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7809-:d:1473521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Azeez Erumban, 2008. "Lifetimes Of Machinery And Equipment: Evidence From Dutch Manufacturing," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 54(2), pages 237-268, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    2. Ana Rincon-Aznar & Rebecca Riley & Garry Young, 2017. "Academic Review of Asset Lives in the UK," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 474, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    3. Wang, Lili & Szirmai, Adam, 2008. "Regional Capital Inputs in Chinese Industry and Manufacturing, 1978-2003," MERIT Working Papers 2008-028, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Barth, Nini & Cappelen, Ådne & Skjerpen, Terje & Todsen, Steinar & Åbyholm, Thom, 2016. "Expected service lives and depreciation profiles for capital assets: Evidence based on a survey of Norwegian firms," Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, IOS Press, issue 4, pages 329-369.
    5. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-99 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Peter Brailovsky & Lorena Sanchez & Dilara Subasi & Jochen Rentsch & Ralf Preu & Sebastian Nold, 2024. "Photovoltaic Manufacturing Factories and Industrial Site Environmental Impact Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Bert M. Balk, 2007. "Measuring Productivity Change without Neoclassical Assumptions: A Conceptual Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP042007, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    8. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2018. "Markov chain modeling and forecasting of product returns in remanufacturing based on stock mean-age," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 474-489.
    9. Simms, Christopher & Frishammar, Johan & Ford, Nicholas, 2021. "The front end in radical process innovation projects: Sources of knowledge problems and coping mechanisms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Wang, Lili & Szirmai, Adam, 2012. "Capital inputs in the Chinese economy: Estimates for the total economy, industry and manufacturing," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 81-104.
    11. Villarreal, Francisco G. & Aravena, Claudio & Jofré, José, 2010. "Estimación de servicios de capital y productividad para América Latina," Estudios Estadísticos 4772, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Maes, Ben & Sacchi, Romain & Steubing, Bernhard & Pizzol, Massimo & Audenaert, Amaryllis & Craeye, Bart & Buyle, Matthias, 2023. "Prospective consequential life cycle assessment: Identifying the future marginal suppliers using integrated assessment models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Ghulam Mustafa & Muhammad Jamil, 2018. "Testing the Governance-Productivity Nexus for Emerging Asian Countries," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 143-169, Jan-June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7809-:d:1473521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.