IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7633-d1470300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Green Bond Issuance Facilitate the Spillover Effect of Green Technology Innovation in Industry? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Qiyue Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yanli Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Qian Chen

    (Sanya Oceanographic Institution, Ocean University of China, Sanya 572024, China)

Abstract

As the concept of balancing environmental protection and maintaining sustainable economic development has been widely recognized, the green bond is assuming an increasingly significant role within China’s financial market. We utilize the data from China’s A-share listed enterprises that issued bonds in the period 2010 to 2021 and try to examine whether and how green bond issuance facilitates the spillover effect of green technology innovation in industry. The results show that: (1) Green bond issuance can generate a spillover effect, greatly enhancing green technology innovation within the industry. (2) The spillover effect of green technology innovation from green bond issuance within an industry is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises, and relatively weaker for enterprises in Northeast China in the same industry. Relative to non-high-pollution industries, high-pollution industries reinforce the spillover effect. (3) Financing cost and agency cost are important influencing mechanisms for green bond issuance to improve peer enterprises’ level of green technology innovation. Overall, the results provide theoretical support for encouraging the market for green bonds to maintain their development over the long term and for effectively promoting the transformation of the economy and society to a green and low carbon one.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiyue Zhang & Yanli Wang & Qian Chen, 2024. "How Does Green Bond Issuance Facilitate the Spillover Effect of Green Technology Innovation in Industry? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7633-:d:1470300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Baker & Daniel Bergstresser & George Serafeim & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2018. "Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds," NBER Working Papers 25194, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Serena Fatica & Roberto Panzica, 2021. "Green bonds as a tool against climate change?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2688-2701, July.
    3. Tang, Dragon Yongjun & Zhang, Yupu, 2020. "Do shareholders benefit from green bonds?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Wang, Hu & Shen, Hong & Li, Shouwei, 2023. "Does green direct financing work in reducing carbon risk?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Caroline Flammer, 2020. "Green Bonds: Effectiveness and Implications for Public Policy," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 95-128.
    6. Zhen Sun & Jianfen Feng & Rongxi Zhou & Yue Yu & Yaojian Deng, 2022. "Can Labeled Green Bonds Reduce Financing Cost in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Kaustia, Markku & Rantala, Ville, 2015. "Social learning and corporate peer effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 653-669.
    8. Chunyang Wang & Sujuan Zhao & Haitao Zheng & Yiyi Bai, 2022. "Does Financial Constraint Hinder Firm Growth?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4195-4206, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Farid, Saqib & Ferrer, Román & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, 2021. "Comparative efficiency of green and conventional bonds pre- and during COVID-19: An asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Hinsche, Isabelle Cathérine, 2021. "A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers," CFS Working Paper Series 663, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    3. Arif, Muhammad & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Farid, Saqib & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "Diversifier or more? Hedge and safe haven properties of green bonds during COVID-19," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Bastien Baldacci & Dylan Possamaï, 2022. "Governmental incentives for green bonds investment," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 5, December.
    5. Yousaf, Imran & Suleman, Muhammad Tahir & Demirer, Riza, 2022. "Green investments: A luxury good or a financial necessity?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    6. Athanasios Tsagkanos & Aarzoo Sharma & Bikramaditya Ghosh, 2022. "Green Bonds and Commodities: A New Asymmetric Sustainable Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Román Ferrer & Rafael Benítez & Vicente J. Bolós, 2021. "Interdependence between Green Financial Instruments and Major Conventional Assets: A Wavelet-Based Network Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Banerjee, Ameet Kumar & Ghardallou, Wafa & Umar, Zaghum, 2022. "Is greenness an optimal hedge for sectoral stock indices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Jiang, Kangqi & Chen, Zhongfei & Chen, Fanglin, 2022. "Green creates value: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Bastien Baldacci & Dylan Possamai, 2021. "Governmental incentives for green bonds investment," Papers 2101.00648, arXiv.org.
    11. Ren, Penghan & Cheng, Zhonghua & Dai, Qingling, 2024. "Can green bond issuance promote enterprise green technological innovation?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    12. Huang, Jin & Liu, Ruiqi & Wang, Wenting & Wang, Zi'ang & Wang, Congwei & (Jimmy) Jin, Yong, 2024. "Unleashing Fintech’s potential: A catalyst for green bonds issuance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Jens Teubler & Sebastian Schuster, 2022. "Causal Strands for Social Bonds—A Case Study on the Credibility of Claims from Impact Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    14. Lebelle, Martin & Lajili Jarjir, Souad & Sassi, Syrine, 2022. "The effect of issuance documentation disclosure and readability on liquidity: Evidence from green bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    15. Zirek, Duygu & Unsal, Omer, 2023. "Green bonds: Do investors benefit from third-party certification?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. Mohamed Amine Boutabba & Yves Rannou, 2020. "Investor strategies and Liquidity Premia in the European Green Bond market," Post-Print hal-02544451, HAL.
    17. Wang, Chih-Wei & Wu, Yu-Ching & Hsieh, Hsin-Yi & Huang, Po-Hsiang & Lin, Meng-Chieh, 2022. "Does green bond issuance have an impact on climate risk concerns?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Petreski, Aleksandar & Schäfer, Dorothea & Stephan, Andreas, 2023. "The reputation effect of green bond issuance and its impact on the cost of capital," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 493, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    19. Riaz Tabassum & Selama Aslam Izah & Nor Normaziah Mohd & Hassan Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh, 2024. "Meaningful Review of Existing Trends, Expansion, and Future Directions of Green Bond Research: A Bibliometric Approach," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 1-36, March.
    20. Kakuho Furukawa & Hibiki Ichiue & Noriyuki Shiraki, 2020. "How Does Climate Change Interact with the Financial System? A Survey," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-8, Bank of Japan.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7633-:d:1470300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.