IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7385-d1465298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Evaluation of Road Network Resilience to Traffic Accidents: An Emergency Management Perspective for Sustainable Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gang Yu

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China
    Shanghai Urban Construction Group Research Center for Building Industrialization, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China)

  • Jiayi Xie

    (SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China
    Shanghai Urban Construction Group Research Center for Building Industrialization, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China)

  • Vijayan Sugumaran

    (Center for Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
    Department of Decision and Information Sciences, School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA)

Abstract

When assessing road network resilience, emergency management behavior should be considered, as this represents the road network’s capacity to adapt to and recover from traffic accidents. Given the timeliness and variability of emergency management behavior, deterministic approaches seem inadequate to represent real road network performance. Thus, this paper innovatively designs an emergency management perspective-based dynamic evaluation method of road network resilience to traffic accidents. Firstly, based on four stages of emergency management, a road network resilience evaluation index system encompassing resilience capabilities, resilience attributes and traffic accident emergency management ability indicators is constructed. Afterwards, the gray relational technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (GRA-TOPSIS) evaluation method based on combination weighting, which integrates factor analysis with hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy expert scoring, is designed to quantify resilience. Finally, the obstacle degree model is utilized for identifying resilience constraints as the input of a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to predict the resilience variation trend. The fast road network of Shanghai in China is adopted as a case study, and the results indicate that road network resilience embodies significant spatial distribution characteristics. Road length, number of tractors, perception and response and disposal time of traffic accidents cast notable effects on resilience. Additionally, some roads are forecast to show descending resilience. The proposed method is valuable for helping policymakers identify current and potential vulnerable roads and to formulate proposals to effectively improve the resilience of urban agglomerations and promote sustainable cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Gang Yu & Jiayi Xie & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2024. "Dynamic Evaluation of Road Network Resilience to Traffic Accidents: An Emergency Management Perspective for Sustainable Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7385-:d:1465298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thamer Alslamah & Yousef Mohammad Alsofayan & Mahmudul Hassan Al Imam & Monerah Abdullah Almazroa & Adil Abalkhail & Ibrahim Alasqah & Ilias Mahmud, 2023. "Emergency Medical Service Response Time for Road Traffic Accidents in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Analysis of National Data (2016–2020)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Bešinović, Nikola & Ferrari Nassar, Raphael & Szymula, Christopher, 2022. "Resilience assessment of railway networks: Combining infrastructure restoration and transport management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Nogal, M. & Honfi, D., 2019. "Assessment of road traffic resilience assuming stochastic user behaviour," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 72-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Xu, Peng-Cheng & Lu, Qing-Chang & Xie, Chi & Cheong, Taesu, 2024. "Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Alessandra Cornaro & Daniele Grechi, 2023. "Evaluation of Railway Systems: A Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min, 2024. "A multi-perspective functionality loss assessment of coupled railway and airline systems under extreme events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Zhang, Wangxin & Han, Qiang & Shang, Wen-Long & Xu, Chengshun, 2024. "Seismic resilience assessment of interdependent urban transportation-electric power system under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Knoester, Max J. & Bešinović, Nikola & Afghari, Amir Pooyan & Goverde, Rob M.P. & van Egmond, Jochen, 2024. "A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Wang, Feng & Tian, Jin & Shi, Chenli & Ling, Jiamu & Chen, Zian & Xu, Zhengguo, 2024. "A multi-stage quantitative resilience analysis and optimization framework considering dynamic decisions for urban infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Cheng, Yao & Elsayed, E.A. & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Nogal, M. & Nogal, A., 2021. "Sensitivity method for extreme-based engineering problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Zhang, Mingyuan & Yang, Xiangjie & Zhang, Juan & Li, Gang, 2022. "Post-earthquake resilience optimization of a rural “road-bridge†transportation network system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Boakye, Jessica & Guidotti, Roberto & Gardoni, Paolo & Murphy, Colleen, 2022. "The role of transportation infrastructure on the impact of natural hazards on communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    13. Sohouenou, Philippe Y.R. & Neves, Luis A.C., 2021. "Assessing the effects of link-repair sequences on road network resilience," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    14. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yin, Dezhi & Zuo, Borui & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Urban bus accident analysis: based on a Tropos Goal Risk-Accident Framework considering Learning From Incidents process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Kuttler, Emma & Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D. & Johansson, Jonas, 2024. "Protection-interdiction-restoration for resilient multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Dui, Hongyan & Chen, Shuanshuan & Zhou, Yanjie & Wu, Shaomin, 2022. "Maintenance analysis of transportation networks by the traffic transfer principle considering node idle capacity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    17. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong, 2023. "Measurement and ranking of important link combinations in the analysis of transportation network vulnerability envelope buffers under multiple-link disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 118-144.
    18. Zhu, Chunli & Wu, Jianping & Liu, Mingyu & Luan, Jianlin & Li, Tingting & Hu, Kezhen, 2020. "Cyber-physical resilience modelling and assessment of urban roadway system interrupted by rainfall," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Resilience assessment of waterway transportation systems: Combining system performance and recovery cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7385-:d:1465298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.