IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7139-d1459932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Platforms as a Fertile Ground for the Economic Sustainability of Startups: Assaying Scenarios, Actions, Plans, and Players

Author

Listed:
  • Morteza Hadizadeh

    (College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran 1738953355, Iran)

  • Javad Ghaffari Feyzabadi

    (Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran 1738953355, Iran)

  • Zahra Fardi

    (Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran 1738953355, Iran)

  • Seyed Morteza Mortazavi

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin 3414896818, Iran)

  • Vitor Braga

    (CIICESI, ESTG, Polytechnic of Porto, 4610 Felgueiras, Portugal)

  • Aidin Salamzadeh

    (CIICESI, ESTG, Polytechnic of Porto, 4610 Felgueiras, Portugal)

Abstract

This study examines the transformative role of digital platforms in fostering sustainable entrepreneurship within emerging economies. We argue that platforms transcend mere communication channels, acting as catalysts for innovation and collaboration among startups, thereby driving economic, social, and environmental progress. Our framework emphasizes platform-enabled startups, navigating the unique challenges and opportunities presented by these dynamic markets. We adopt a dual lens, using a mixed-methods approach to analyze digital development trends through the prism of platforms in emerging economies. This reframes the discourse on technology-driven development, acknowledging the unidirectional flow of platform adoption from developed nations. The research emphasizes the need for prioritizing sustainability standards in these regions. Furthermore, we delve into the interplay between platforms and sustainable entrepreneurship with the following three objectives: (1) deciphering the drivers of platform–startup interaction for sustainability goals, (2) formulating policies to maximize platform benefits while mitigating risks, and (3) developing actionable strategies for stakeholders to cultivate a thriving ecosystem of sustainable platform-based ventures. The findings of this study reveal six key uncertainties that will shape the future trajectories of sustainable entrepreneurship within digital ecosystems, particularly in developing nations. These uncertainties encompass the following: environmental and social standards, ongoing education and development, mobile application development and utilization, global market access, and competitiveness and value creation. Several alternative future scenarios have been constructed based on these uncertainties, including advancements in digital technologies, dynamic market conditions and evolving consumer behaviors, a heightened emphasis on sustainability and corporate social responsibility, and a paradigm shift towards collaborative business models. A comprehensive framework of supportive policies and interventions has been proposed to facilitate the realization of these scenarios. Moreover, the analysis underscores the pivotal roles of digital platform providers and startups as key stakeholders in this evolving landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Morteza Hadizadeh & Javad Ghaffari Feyzabadi & Zahra Fardi & Seyed Morteza Mortazavi & Vitor Braga & Aidin Salamzadeh, 2024. "Digital Platforms as a Fertile Ground for the Economic Sustainability of Startups: Assaying Scenarios, Actions, Plans, and Players," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7139-:d:1459932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoje Jo & Hakkon Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2015. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 257-284, October.
    2. Cheng, Ching-Hsue & Lin, Yin, 2002. "Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 174-186, October.
    3. Ghezzi, Antonio, 2019. "Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 945-960.
    4. Noelia, Franco-Leal & Rosalia, Diaz-Carrion, 2020. "A dynamic analysis of the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in reducing innovation obstacles for startups," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    5. Ans Kolk, 2008. "Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Dabbous, Amal & Barakat, Karine Aoun & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "The impact of digitalization on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Ionuț Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marinela Istrate & Maria Grosu & Camelia Cătălina Mihalciuc & Adrian Vilcu, 2023. "Sustainable Corporate Performance Based on Audit Report Influence: An Empirical Approach through Financial Transparency and Gender Equality Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Manideep Yenugula & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Subramaniam Kaliappan & Rengaraj Saravanakumar & Areej Alasiry & Mehrez Marzougui & Abdulaziz AlMohimeed & Ahmed Elaraby, 2023. "Analyzing the Critical Parameters for Implementing Sustainable AI Cloud System in an IT Industry Using AHP-ISM-MICMAC Integrated Hybrid MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-35, August.
    9. Kelly, Dr Gráinne & McAdam, Maura, 2022. "Scaffolding liminality: The lived experience of women entrepreneurs in digital spaces," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weking, Jörg & Desouza, Kevin C. & Fielt, Erwin & Kowalkiewicz, Marek, 2023. "Metaverse-enabled entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    2. Mariann Veresné Somosi & Krisztina Varga & György Kocziszky, 2019. "Step by Step for Social Innovation with Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejes_v5_i.
    3. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    4. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    7. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    8. Halit Gonenc & Bert Scholtens, 2019. "Responsibility and Performance Relationship in the Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-49, June.
    9. Lamin B. Ceesay, 2020. "Exploring the Influence of NGOs in Corporate Sustainability Adoption: Institutional-Legitimacy Perspective," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 135-147, December.
    10. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Kunene, Noxolo & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2024. "Renewable energy certificates and firm value: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    12. Lung-Hsin Lin & Kung-Jeng Wang, 2022. "Talent Retention of New Generations for Sustainable Employment Relationships in Work 4.0 Era—Assessment by Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Halkos, George & Skouloudis, Antonis, 2015. "Exploring corporate disclosure on climate change: Evidence from the Greek business sector," MPRA Paper 64566, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Kurniawan, Putu Sukma, 2018. "An Analysis of Information Materiality on Corporate Sustainability Report Using Information Materiality Map: A Review in Mining Industry in Indonesia," INA-Rxiv 7dzha, Center for Open Science.
    15. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    16. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    17. Olivier Boiral, 2016. "Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 751-768, June.
    18. Cherbib, Jihene, 2024. "Exploring the interplay between entrepreneurial orientation, causation and effectuation under unexpected covid-19 uncertainty: Insights from large French banks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Daniel Reißmann & Daniela Thrän & Alberto Bezama, 2018. "Key Development Factors of Hydrothermal Processes in Germany by 2030: A Fuzzy Logic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7139-:d:1459932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.