IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6853-d1453394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Pricing Strategies for Airport Shuttles: A Study of Shanghai Based on Customized Bus Ticketing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Yu

    (Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Durability and Operation Safety in Airfield of CAAC, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Department of Science and Innovation Management, Shanghai Airport (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China)

  • Chenlong Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Durability and Operation Safety in Airfield of CAAC, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Zhikang Zhai

    (Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Durability and Operation Safety in Airfield of CAAC, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yuefeng Zheng

    (Department of Science and Innovation Management, Shanghai Airport (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China)

  • Yu Shen

    (Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Durability and Operation Safety in Airfield of CAAC, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Airport shuttle buses, as a specialized form of bus service, serve as an economical, efficient, and sustainable transportation option for air travelers. In contrast to conventional bus services, airport shuttle bus operations exhibit more pronounced market-oriented characteristics, striving to balance extensive public transport coverage with the optimization of corporate profitability. Although these services outperform regular bus transit in terms of efficiency, they incur higher operational costs. However, existing studies on enhancing profitability and optimizing resource allocation for airport shuttle buses are inadequate. This study proposes a differential pricing strategy based on historical ticketing data. Initially, we analyze the characteristics of orders, users, and reservations within the context of customized bus operations. Leveraging the differences among various groups, we employ clustering techniques to classify seat grades and segment users. Based on the clustering outcomes, we determine distinct price elasticity values for each segment. As the strategies are developed based on seat grades, booking time, and user travel patterns, the numerical experiments indicate that the proposed differentiated pricing strategy can increase the revenue of customized public transport services by at least 41%. This strategy not only enhances the efficiency of resource allocation and service accessibility but also makes the service more financially sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Yu & Chenlong Xu & Zhikang Zhai & Yuefeng Zheng & Yu Shen, 2024. "Differential Pricing Strategies for Airport Shuttles: A Study of Shanghai Based on Customized Bus Ticketing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6853-:d:1453394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yuxin & Zhang, Z. John, 2009. "Dynamic targeted pricing with strategic consumers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 43-50, January.
    2. Guillermo Gallego & Garrett van Ryzin, 1997. "A Multiproduct Dynamic Pricing Problem and Its Applications to Network Yield Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 24-41, February.
    3. Guillermo Gallego & Garrett van Ryzin, 1994. "Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(8), pages 999-1020, August.
    4. Youyi Feng & Baichun Xiao, 2001. "A Dynamic Airline Seat Inventory Control Model and Its Optimal Policy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 938-949, December.
    5. Yigao Liang, 1999. "Solution to the Continuous Time Dynamic Yield Management Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 117-123, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel Bitran & René Caldentey, 2003. "An Overview of Pricing Models for Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 203-229, August.
    2. Jeffrey I. McGill & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 1999. "Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 233-256, May.
    3. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2000. "Revenue management under general discrete choice model of consumer behavior," Economics Working Papers 533, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2001.
    4. Pak, K. & Piersma, N., 2002. "airline revenue management," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-12-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Pak, K. & Piersma, N., 2002. "Airline revenue management: an overview of OR techniques 1982-2001," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Chew, Ek Peng & Lee, Chulung & Liu, Rujing, 2009. "Joint inventory allocation and pricing decisions for perishable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 139-150, July.
    7. Youyi Feng & Baichun Xiao, 2001. "A Dynamic Airline Seat Inventory Control Model and Its Optimal Policy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 938-949, December.
    8. Muzaffer Buyruk & Ertan Güner, 2022. "Personalization in airline revenue management: an overview and future outlook," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 129-139, April.
    9. William L. Cooper, 2002. "Asymptotic Behavior of an Allocation Policy for Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 720-727, August.
    10. Selçuk Korkmaz & O. Erhun Kundakcioglu & Orhan Sivrikaya, 2022. "A fluid approximation for the single-leg fare allocation problem with nonhomogeneous poisson demand," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 81-96, February.
    11. Feng, Youyi & Xiao, Baichun, 2006. "Integration of pricing and capacity allocation for perishable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 17-34, January.
    12. Gökgür, Burak & Karabatı, Selçuk, 2019. "Dynamic and targeted bundle pricing of two independently valued products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 184-198.
    13. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 15-33, January.
    14. Xiao, Baichun & Yang, Wei, 2010. "A revenue management model for products with two capacity dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 412-421, September.
    15. Chatwin, Richard E., 2000. "Optimal dynamic pricing of perishable products with stochastic demand and a finite set of prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 149-174, August.
    16. Dasci, A. & Karakul, M., 2009. "Two-period dynamic versus fixed-ratio pricing in a capacity constrained duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 945-968, September.
    17. Yiwei Chen & Vivek F. Farias, 2013. "Simple Policies for Dynamic Pricing with Imperfect Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 612-624, June.
    18. Aniruddha Dutta, 2019. "Capacity Allocation of Game Tickets Using Dynamic Pricing," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-12, October.
    19. Namin, Aidin & Soysal, Gonca P. & Ratchford, Brian T., 2022. "Alleviating demand uncertainty for seasonal goods: An analysis of attribute-based markdown policy for fashion retailers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 671-681.
    20. Feng, Youyi & Xiao, Baichun, 2006. "A continuous-time seat control model for single-leg flights with no-shows and optimal overbooking upper bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1298-1316, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6853-:d:1453394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.