IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6678-d1449821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Sustainable Construction: Discrete Modular Systems & Robotic Assembly

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxi Liu

    (Digital Design Unit (DDU), Technical University of Darmstadt, El-Lissitzky-Straße 1, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Boris Belousov

    (German Research Center for AI (DFKI), Landwehrstr. 50A, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Tim Schneider

    (Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS), Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 10, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Kevin Harsono

    (Department of the Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Keelung Road 43, Section 4, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Tsung-Wei Cheng

    (Department of the Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Keelung Road 43, Section 4, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Shen-Guan Shih

    (Department of the Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Keelung Road 43, Section 4, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Oliver Tessmann

    (Digital Design Unit (DDU), Technical University of Darmstadt, El-Lissitzky-Straße 1, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Jan Peters

    (Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS), Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 10, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

Abstract

This research explores the SL-Block system within an architecture framework by embracing building modularity, combinatorial design, topological interlocking, machine learning, and tactile sensor-based robotic assembly. The SL-Block, composed of S and L-shaped tetracubes, possesses a unique self-interlocking feature that allows for reversible joining and the creation of various 2D or 3D structures. In architecture modularity, the high degree of reconfigurability and adaptability of the SL-Block system introduces a new element of interest. Unlike modularization strategies that emphasize large-scale volumetric modules or standardized building components, using small-scale generic building blocks provides greater flexibility in maximizing design variations and reusability. Furthermore, the serial repetition and limited connectivity of building elements reduce the efforts required for bespoke manufacturing and automated assembly. In this article, we present our digital design and robotic assembly strategies for developing dry-jointed modular construction with SL-Blocks. Drawing on combinatorics and graph theory, we propose computational design methods that can automatically generate hierarchical SL-Block assemblies from given shapes. To address the physical complexities of contact-rich assembly tasks, we develop robotics using two distinct methods: pre-programmed assembly and sensor-based reinforcement learning. Through a series of demonstrators, we showcase the ability of SL-Blocks not only to reconfigure conventional building tectonics but also to create new building configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxi Liu & Boris Belousov & Tim Schneider & Kevin Harsono & Tsung-Wei Cheng & Shen-Guan Shih & Oliver Tessmann & Jan Peters, 2024. "Advancing Sustainable Construction: Discrete Modular Systems & Robotic Assembly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6678-:d:1449821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langlois, Richard N., 2002. "Modularity in technology and organization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 19-37, September.
    2. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal, 2004. "Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 159-173, February.
    3. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    2. Gebauer, Judith & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2013. "Joining Supply and Demand Conditions of IT Enabled Change: Toward an Economic Theory of Inter-firm Modulation," Working Papers 13-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    3. Oliver Baumann, 2015. "Distributed Problem Solving in Modular Systems: the Benefit of Temporary Coordination Neglect," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 124-136, January.
    4. Senthil Kumar Muthusamy & Ramadevi Kannan, 2023. "Profits crisis: evolving patterns of firm size and performance in traditional U.S. industries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 575-603, September.
    5. Babak Heydari & Mohsen Mosleh & Kia Dalili, 2016. "From Modular to Distributed Open Architectures: A Unified Decision Framework," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 252-266, May.
    6. Schmickl, Christina & Kieser, Alfred, 2008. "How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 473-491, April.
    7. Yue Maggie Zhou, 2013. "Designing for Complexity: Using Divisions and Hierarchy to Manage Complex Tasks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 339-355, April.
    8. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Tian Heong Chan & Shi-Ying Lim, 2023. "The Emergence of Novel Product Uses: An Investigation of Exaptations in IKEA Hacks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2870-2892, May.
    11. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jesse Bockstedt & Alok Gupta, 2012. "Modeling Supply-Side Dynamics of IT Components, Products, and Infrastructure: An Empirical Analysis Using Vector Autoregression," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 397-417, June.
    12. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    13. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
    14. Hüseyin Tanriverdi & Prabhudev Konana & Ling Ge, 2007. "The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 280-299, September.
    15. Glenn Hoetker & Anand Swaminathan & Will Mitchell, 2007. "Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 178-191, February.
    16. Vincent FRIGANT & Stéphanie PERES & Stéphane VIROL, 2012. "How do SMEs to rise at the top of the supply chain? An econometric exploration of the French auto industry (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-16, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    17. Murmann, Johann Peter & Frenken, Koen, 2006. "Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 925-952, September.
    18. Fixson, Sebastian K. & Park, Jin-Kyu, 2008. "The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1296-1316, September.
    19. Willy C. Shih, 2021. "Increasing the Level of Abstraction as a Strategy for Accelerating the Adoption of Complex Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 54-61, March.
    20. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6678-:d:1449821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.