IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6632-d1449052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Social Assessment Framework to Derive a Social Score for Green Material Selection: A Case Study from the Sri Lankan Cement Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ashani Fernando

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

  • Chandana Siriwardana

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

  • Chamila Gunasekara

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • David William Law

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Guomin Zhang

    (Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • J. C. P. H. Gamage

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka)

Abstract

Assessing the sustainability of material-based products now encompasses social sustainability, a vital aspect often overlooked. Even though the existing frameworks provide a starting point, they do not often differentiate between the assessment criteria when making comparisons within one specific material category, which has made sustainability assessments more focused on environmental and economic aspects. This study addresses this critical gap by pioneering a social assessment framework curated to help practitioners to choose the most sustainable cement type out of the standard cement types used in the industry. Utilizing the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and linear-scoring method, criteria weights were systematically assigned based on scoring by industry and academic experts. The findings highlight the importance of integrating social sustainability with environmental and economic factors in cement selection. Unlike traditional material selection, which primarily considers cost and performance, green material selection emphasizes the holistic impact of materials, including social factors. Variations in weightage decisions among experts highlight the influence of practical experience, research interests, and context. Functionality emerges as a crucial criterion. The ranking of cement types based on social scores places CEM II/B-M at the top, followed by CEM IV/A, CEM II/A-S, CEM II/A-V, CEM I, and CEM II/A-LL. The evolving nature of sustainability necessitates ongoing research to refine and expand existing frameworks for a more sustainable construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashani Fernando & Chandana Siriwardana & Chamila Gunasekara & David William Law & Guomin Zhang & J. C. P. H. Gamage, 2024. "A Social Assessment Framework to Derive a Social Score for Green Material Selection: A Case Study from the Sri Lankan Cement Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6632-:d:1449052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fathi Alarabi Yosef & Luay Jum’a & Muntasir Alatoom, 2023. "Identifying and Categorizing Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Based on Triple Bottom Line Dimensions: Evaluation of Practice Implementation in the Cement Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luay Jum'a & Dominik Zimon & Robert Sroufe & Jonah Tyan, 2024. "Sustainable supply chain management's impact on triple bottom line performance: Does the firm size matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4673-4693, September.
    2. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna & Weronika Wilczewska, 2024. "Sustainable Business Model Implementation in Polish Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6632-:d:1449052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.