IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6285-d1440883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven Net-Zero Carbon Monitoring: Applications of Geographic Information Systems, Building Information Modelling, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Jilong Li

    (School of Built Environment, Kensington Campus, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Sara Shirowzhan

    (School of Built Environment, Kensington Campus, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Gloria Pignatta

    (School of Built Environment, Kensington Campus, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Samad M. E. Sepasgozar

    (School of Built Environment, Kensington Campus, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

NZCCs aim to minimise urban carbon emissions for healthier cities in line with national and international low-carbon targets and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Many countries have recently adopted Net-Zero Carbon City (NZCC) policies and strategies. While there are many studies available on NZCC cities’ definitions and policymaking, currently, research is rare on understanding the role of urban data-driven technologies such as Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), as well as AI, for achieving the goals of NZCCs in relation to sustainable development goals (SDGs), e.g., SDGs 3, 7,11, 13, and 17. This paper aims to fill this gap by establishing a systematic review and ascertaining the opportunities and barriers of data-driven approaches, analytics, digital technologies, and AI for supporting decision-making and monitoring progress toward achieving NZCC development and policy/strategy development. Two scholarly databases, i.e., Web of Science and Scopus databases, were used to find papers based on our selected relevant keywords. We also conducted a desktop review to explore policies, strategies, and visualisation technologies that are already being used. Our inclusion/exclusion criteria refined our selection to 55 papers, focusing on conceptual and theoretical research. While digital technologies and data analytics are improving and can help in the move from net-zero carbon concepts and theories to practical analysis and the evaluation of cities’ emission levels and in monitoring progress toward reducing carbon, our research shows that these capabilities of digital technologies are not used thoroughly yet to bridge theory and practice. These studies ignore advanced tools like city digital twins and GIS-based spatial analyses. No data, technologies, or platforms are available to track progress towards a NZCC. Artificial Intelligence, big data collection, and analytics are required to predict and monitor the time it takes for each city to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. GIS and BIM can be used to estimate embodied carbon and predict urban development emissions. We found that smart city initiatives and data-driven decision-making approaches are crucial for achieving NZCCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jilong Li & Sara Shirowzhan & Gloria Pignatta & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2024. "Data-Driven Net-Zero Carbon Monitoring: Applications of Geographic Information Systems, Building Information Modelling, Remote Sensing, and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6285-:d:1440883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Li, Francis G.N. & Bataille, Chris & Pye, Steve & O'Sullivan, Aidan, 2019. "Prospects for energy economy modelling with big data: Hype, eliminating blind spots, or revolutionising the state of the art?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 991-1002.
    3. Huiping Wang & Zhun Zhang, 2022. "Forecasting CO 2 Emissions Using A Novel Grey Bernoulli Model: A Case of Shaanxi Province in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Omer Saud Azeez & Biswajeet Pradhan & Helmi Z. M. Shafri, 2018. "Vehicular CO Emission Prediction Using Support Vector Regression Model and GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Hui Jin, 2021. "Prediction of direct carbon emissions of Chinese provinces using artificial neural networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. B. Dan Wood & Arnold Vedlitz, 2007. "Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 552-568, July.
    7. Luo, Haizhi & Li, Yingyue & Gao, Xinyu & Meng, Xiangzhao & Yang, Xiaohu & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Carbon emission prediction model of prefecture-level administrative region: A land-use-based case study of Xi'an city, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    8. Ziyu Duan & Seiyong Kim, 2023. "Progress in Research on Net-Zero-Carbon Cities: A Literature Review and Knowledge Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aaron McCright, 2011. "Political orientation moderates Americans’ beliefs and concern about climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 243-253, January.
    2. Claire Daniel & Christopher Pettit, 2022. "Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1875-1892, September.
    3. Jeremiah Bohr, 2017. "Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 271-285, May.
    4. Luo, Haizhi & Zhang, Yiwen & Gao, Xinyu & Liu, Zhengguang & Song, Xia & Meng, Xiangzhao & Yang, Xiaohu, 2024. "Unveiling land use-carbon Nexus: Spatial matrix-enhanced neural network for predicting commercial and residential carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    5. Zhicong Zhang & Hao Xie & Jubing Zhang & Xinye Wang & Jiayu Wei & Xibin Quan, 2022. "Prediction and Trend Analysis of Regional Industrial Carbon Emission in China: A Study of Nanjing City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Yadi Zhao & Lei Yan & Jian Wu & Ximing Song, 2023. "Design and Implementation of a Digital Twin System for Log Rotary Cutting Optimization," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Donatella Baiardi, 2021. "What do you think about climate change?," Working Papers 477, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    8. Delshad, Ashlie B. & Raymond, Leigh & Sawicki, Vanessa & Wegener, Duane T., 2010. "Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3414-3425, July.
    9. Zhao, Lu-Tao & Zheng, Zhi-Yi & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2023. "Forecasting oil inventory changes with Google trends: A hybrid wavelet decomposer and ARDL-SVR ensemble model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Hossein Omrany & Karam M. Al-Obaidi & Amreen Husain & Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, 2023. "Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Lawrence C. Hamilton, 2016. "Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    12. Maowen Sun & Boyi Liang & Xuebin Meng & Yunfei Zhang & Zong Wang & Jia Wang, 2024. "Study on the Evolution of Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Emissions and Influencing Factors in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Vittorio Astarita & Giuseppe Guido & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas, 2024. "Risk Reduction in Transportation Systems: The Role of Digital Twins According to a Bibliometric-Based Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    14. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2016. "Post-materialism, Religiosity, Political Orientation, Locus of Control and Concern for Global Warming: A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Nations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1273-1298, September.
    15. Lawrence Hamilton, 2011. "Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 231-242, January.
    16. Joel Manifold & Suresh Renukappa & Subashini Suresh & Panagiotis Georgakis & Gamage Rashini Perera, 2024. "Dual Transition of Net Zero Carbon and Digital Transformation: Case Study of UK Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-30, September.
    17. Milena Kajba & Borut Jereb & Tina Cvahte Ojsteršek, 2023. "Exploring Digital Twins in the Transport and Energy Fields: A Bibliometrics and Literature Review Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Raya Muttarak & Thanyaporn Chankrajang, 2015. "Who is concerned about and takes action on climate change? Gender and education divides among Thais," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 13(1), pages 193-220.
    19. Rui Bian & Anzhou Zhao & Lidong Zou & Xianfeng Liu & Ruihao Xu & Ziyang Li, 2024. "Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Change and Carbon Emission under Multiple Development Scenarios at the City Level: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Ahmed Abdulkareem Ahmed Adulaimi & Biswajeet Pradhan & Subrata Chakraborty & Abdullah Alamri, 2021. "Traffic Noise Modelling Using Land Use Regression Model Based on Machine Learning, Statistical Regression and GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6285-:d:1440883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.