IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6162-d1438107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth and Architectural Response of Beech Seedlings to Canopy Removal and Soil Compaction from Selective Logging

Author

Listed:
  • Farzam Tavankar

    (Department of Forestry, Khalkhal Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khalkhal 56817-31367, Iran)

  • Aezam Rezaee Kivi

    (Department of Plant Biology, Khalkhal Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khalkhal 56817-31367, Iran)

  • Ramin Naghdi

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Somehsara P.O. Box 1144, Iran)

  • Francesco Latterini

    (Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035 Kórnik, Poland)

  • Rachele Venanzi

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Rodolfo Picchio

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, Tuscia University, Via San Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Logging operations change the forest environment by creating a heterogeneous canopy with a range of different microenvironments that differ mostly in light intensity and level of soil disturbance. In this study, the growth characteristics and architecture of beech ( Fagus orientalis Lipsky) seedlings grown in three different microenvironments in terms of canopy and soil conditions were investigated. The experimental treatments (microenvironments) included skid trail (removal of canopy and compacted soil), winching corridor (natural canopy and compacted soil), felling gap (removal of canopy and natural soil), and comparison with the control area (canopy and soil in natural state). The results showed that the status of many growth and architectural indicators of seedlings is significantly less favorable than in the control area. These indicators include the length and biomass above and below ground, and the ratio of root length to stem length in the skid trails and winching corridors. The status of these indicators was, however, more favorable in felling gaps than in the control area. The seedling quality index decreased by −12.2% and −4.9% in skid trails and winching corridors, respectively, but increased by 2.4% in felling gaps compared to the control area. The growth characteristics and biomass of seedlings had a significant negative correlation ( p < 0.01) with soil bulk density and penetration resistance and a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) with soil porosity, moisture, and organic matter content. These results showed that the creation of a gap in the stand canopy due to the cutting of individual trees created a favorable micro-environment for the growth of seedlings, but the soil compaction caused by logging operations created an unfavorable micro-environment for these. Therefore, it is necessary to plan and execute the operation of extracting the cut trees in such a manner as to reduce the extent and severity of soil compaction with the goal of preserving and maintaining the stability of the forest ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzam Tavankar & Aezam Rezaee Kivi & Ramin Naghdi & Francesco Latterini & Rachele Venanzi & Rodolfo Picchio, 2024. "Growth and Architectural Response of Beech Seedlings to Canopy Removal and Soil Compaction from Selective Logging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6162-:d:1438107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Gebauer & M. Martinková, 2005. "Effects of pressure on the root systems of Norway spruce plants (Picea abies[L.] Karst.)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(6), pages 268-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6162-:d:1438107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.