IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6150-d1438007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Students’ Utilization of University Footbridges in Amman City: Motivating Factors and Obstacles in an Urban Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Rabab Muhsen

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan)

  • Rama Al-Majali

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan)

  • Ayman Tomah (Maayah)

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt 19117, Jordan)

Abstract

The use of pedestrian footbridges plays a critical role in urban mobility, particularly in university areas with high pedestrian traffic. Despite its importance, footbridge utilization often remains suboptimal due to various influencing factors that are not well understood. This study aims to identify and analyze the factors affecting footbridge utilization among university students in Amman City. By surveying students from four universities—Islamic Sciences University (ISUF), Balqa Applied University (BAUF), and two branches of Jordan University (JUF1 and JUF2)—we explore how accessibility, design aesthetics, safety, emotional and psychological factors, and environmental considerations influence their decision to use footbridges. The findings reveal significant differences in the impact of these factors across universities. Notably, environmental considerations and design aesthetics are pivotal for ISUF students, while JUF1 and BAUF students prioritize convenience and time-saving. Furthermore, our research identifies a crucial difference in safety concerns, with female students exhibiting a higher focus on safety compared to their male counterparts. This highlights the need for gender-sensitive safety interventions in footbridge design. Environmental considerations consistently emerge as a priority for all, reflecting a collective concern for the eco-friendly features of bridge design. This study is considered the first of its kind in Amman City and the region. The results align with global findings, establishing a basis for wider implications concerning the development of theoretical knowledge of urban mobility. This research fills a crucial gap by providing empirical evidence of the diverse factors impacting footbridge usage. It offers valuable insights for urban planners seeking to design and maintain user-friendly and gender-sensitive footbridges, ultimately promoting sustainable urban mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabab Muhsen & Rama Al-Majali & Ayman Tomah (Maayah), 2024. "Assessing Students’ Utilization of University Footbridges in Amman City: Motivating Factors and Obstacles in an Urban Setting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6150-:d:1438007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daudi Katopola & Fredirick Mashili & Marie Hasselberg, 2022. "Pedestrians’ Perception of Pedestrian Bridges—A Qualitative Study in Dar es Salaam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivana Štimac Grandić & Paulo Šćulac & Davor Grandić & Iva Vodopija, 2024. "The Accessible Design of Pedestrian Bridges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Muhammad Abdullah & Nazam Ali & Muhammad Ashraf Javid & Muhammad Waqar Aslam & Charitha Dias, 2023. "Signal-Free Corridor Development and Their Impact on Pedestrians: Insights from Expert and Public Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6150-:d:1438007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.