IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6081-d1436390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend and Variability Analysis of Annual Maximum Rainfall Using Observed and Remotely Sensed Data in the Tropical Climate Zones of Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Okirya

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa)

  • JA Du Plessis

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa)

Abstract

Understanding rainfall variability and trends is crucial for effective water resource management and disaster preparedness, particularly in tropical regions like Uganda. This study analyzes the trends and variability of the Annual Maximum Series (AMS) and seasonal rainfall data across four rainfall stations in Uganda, comparing observed data with various Remotely Sensed Rainfall (RSR) products. The key methods used in this study include the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator for trend analysis, AMS rainfall variability analysis using statistical performance metrics such as the Nash–Sutcliffe Coefficient of Efficiency (NSE) and Percent Bias (PBIAS), and data distribution comparisons based on goodness-of-fit evaluation using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test. The results indicate that most trends in the seasonal rainfall and AMS data are statistically insignificant. However, the September to November (SON) observed rainfall at the Gulu station shows a statistically significant increasing trend of 7.68 mm/year ( p -value = 0.03). Based on the PBIAS metric, GPCC and NOAA_CPC products outperform other RSR data products. At the Jinja station, NOAA_CPC has a PBIAS value of −12.93% and GPCC, −14.64%; at Soroti, GPCC has −9.66% and NOAA_CPC, −14.79%; at Mbarara, GPCC has −5.93% and NOAA_CPC, −11.63%; and at Gulu, GPCC has −3.05% and NOAA_CPC, −19.23%. The KS test results show significant differences in the distribution of RSR data and observed rainfall data, though GPCC shows significant agreement at the Gulu ( p -value = 0.60) and Mbarara ( p -value = 0.14) stations. Additionally, NOAA_CPC outperforms other RSR data products at the Mbarara station, with a KS p -value of 0.24. This study highlights the limitations of current RSR datasets in replicating observed AMS rainfall data. Based on KS test results, GPCC is identified as a better product for hydrological applications at the Gulu, Jinja, and Soroti station areas compared to other RSR products. For the Mbarara station, NOAA_CPC outperforms other RSR products.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Okirya & JA Du Plessis, 2024. "Trend and Variability Analysis of Annual Maximum Rainfall Using Observed and Remotely Sensed Data in the Tropical Climate Zones of Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-44, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6081-:d:1436390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Caloiero & R. Coscarelli & E. Ferrari, 2018. "Application of the Innovative Trend Analysis Method for the Trend Analysis of Rainfall Anomalies in Southern Italy," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4971-4983, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhi-Qiang Yu & Takahiro Hosono & Hiroki Amano & Ronny Berndtsson & Kei Nakagawa, 2024. "Groundwater Resource Assessment by Applying Long-Term Trend Analysis of Spring Discharge, Water Level, and Hydroclimatic Parameters," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(11), pages 4161-4177, September.
    2. Mohammed Achite & Gokmen Ceribasi & Ahmet Iyad Ceyhunlu & Andrzej Wałęga & Tommaso Caloiero, 2021. "The Innovative Polygon Trend Analysis (IPTA) as a Simple Qualitative Method to Detect Changes in Environment—Example Detecting Trends of the Total Monthly Precipitation in Semiarid Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Mohammed Achite & Tommaso Caloiero & Abderrezak Kamel Toubal, 2022. "Rainfall and Runoff Trend Analysis in the Wadi Mina Basin (Northern Algeria) Using Non-Parametric Tests and the ITA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis & Harris Vangelis, 2018. "Water Resources and Environment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4813-4817, December.
    5. Sinan Nacar, 2023. "Trends of High and Low Values of Annual and Seasonal Precipitation in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Gang Deng & Zhiguang Tang & Guojie Hu & Jingwen Wang & Guoqing Sang & Jia Li, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Snowline Altitude and Their Responses to Climate Change in the Tienshan Mountains, Central Asia, during 2001–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Manikandan Muthiah & Saravanan Sivarajan & Nagarajan Madasamy & Anandaraj Natarajan & Raviraj Ayyavoo, 2024. "Analyzing Rainfall Trends Using Statistical Methods across Vaippar Basin, Tamil Nadu, India: A Comprehensive Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6081-:d:1436390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.