IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5933-d1433528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wood Waste Recycling in Sweden—Industrial, Environmental, Social, and Economic Challenges and Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Nilay Elginoz

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Valhallavägen 81, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Joran van Blokland

    (Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Division of Wood Science and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Sahar Safarian

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Aschebergsgatan 44, 41133 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Zeinab Movahedisaveji

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Valhallavägen 81, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Desalegn Yadeta Wedajo

    (Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Division of Wood Science and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Stergios Adamopoulos

    (Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Division of Wood Science and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

The disposal of wood waste at facilities for incineration in Sweden is the only applied management practice today. Energy production from biomass has gained attention for its potential to recover energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, besides being a valuable source for energy generation, wood waste can be effectively recycled into new products. Specifically, recycling wood waste into particleboard is the widely practiced method in Europe, while its benefits have not been explored in the country so far. The objective of this study is to assess the environmental, social, and economic sustainability of producing particleboard and generating energy from wood waste in Sweden. This research investigates four alternative systems for wood waste disposal. The first system involves the production of heat, the second system involves heat and power by wood waste, while the third and the fourth systems, in addition to energy recovery, include partial recycling of wood waste in particleboard production. A life cycle sustainability assessment covering all three pillars (environment, social, and economic) of sustainability was conducted to compare these systems. The results show that adding recycling schemes to incineration in wood waste management practices strengthens the sustainability for all three aspects, and hence, these management methods can be considered as complementary methods rather than competing methods. When all sustainability categories are considered, alternative three (heat recovery and recycling) comes forward as the best option in 11 out of 16 impact categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilay Elginoz & Joran van Blokland & Sahar Safarian & Zeinab Movahedisaveji & Desalegn Yadeta Wedajo & Stergios Adamopoulos, 2024. "Wood Waste Recycling in Sweden—Industrial, Environmental, Social, and Economic Challenges and Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5933-:d:1433528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5933/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5933/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nandimandalam, Hariteja & Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2022. "Renewable wood residue sources as potential alternative for fossil fuel dominated electricity mix for regions in Mississippi: A techno-economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1105-1119.
    2. Sahar Safarian, 2023. "Climate Impact Comparison of Biomass Combustion and Pyrolysis with Different Applications for Biochar Based on LCA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo & Moreira, María Teresa & González-García, Sara, 2023. "Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zygmunt Stanula & Marek Wieruszewski & Adam Zydroń & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2023. "Optimizing Forest-Biomass-Distribution Logistics from a Multi-Level Perspective—Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Diego Voccia & Lucrezia Lamastra, 2024. "Unpacking the Carbon Balance: Biochar Production from Forest Residues and Its Impact on Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Devi Maulida Rahmah & Dwi Purnomo & Fitry Filianty & Irfan Ardiansah & Rahmat Pramulya & Ryozo Noguchi, 2023. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of a Coffee Production Management System in a Rural Area: A Regional Evaluation of the Coffee Industry in West Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Julija Konstantinavičienė & Vlada Vitunskienė, 2023. "Definition and Classification of Potential of Forest Wood Biomass in Terms of Sustainable Development: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5933-:d:1433528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.