IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5929-d1433445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies—A Case Study of Gangu County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Wu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xuelu Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Qiqi Zhao

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Hongyan Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Fei Qu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Miaomiao Zhang

    (College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the impact of land use changes on trade-offs/synergies of the ecosystem service in Gangu County, Gansu province, China, from 2000 to 2020, and intends to provide a reference for decision-making on regional ecological environment protection and restoration. We analyzed the land use changes in Gangu County with the dynamic degree of single land use. Changes in ecosystem service values (ESV) were analyzed using the equivalent factor method. The temporal and spatial distribution patterns of ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies were elaborated with the help of the correlation coefficient method and local autocorrelation analysis. The impact of land use change on trade-offs/synergies of ecosystem service was analyzed according to the ecological contribution rate of land use changing and the changing of land use area. The results showed that: (1) cultivated land and grassland were the dominant land use types in Gangu County, China; the largest increase in the dynamic degree of single land use was in construction land, followed by grassland, and the largest decrease in the dynamic degree of single land use was in unused land, followed by grassland. (2) Between 2000 and 2020, the ESV showed an upward trend; the regulating service provided the largest part of the ESV among the four first ecosystem service types. The medium ESV zone occupied the largest area, and the spatial distribution pattern of ESV was high in the south and low in the north of Gangu County, China. (3) The relationships of ecosystem services were dominated by synergistic and supplemented by trade-offs. The strongest synergistic relationship was expressed between EP and BP, then, between EP and AL. Meanwhile, the strongest trade-off relationship was carried out between BP and FP. During the 20 years, the relationship of ecosystem service showed a weak shift from mainly synergistic to trade-off temporally. Spatially, the synergistic relationship was dominated and concentrated in the central and southern parts of the study area. (4) The increase in the area of grassland and forest land were the root causes resulting in the increase of ESV in Gangu County. In the time dimension, land use change had the greatest impact on the trade-off synergistic relationship between FP and all other services. In the spatial dimension, land use change has little impact on trade-offs/synergies in the northern region and more in the central and southern regions of Gangu County. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for improving the ecological environment and promoting sustainable development in Gangu County. At the same time, it will lay the foundation for the region to realize a win–win situation between economic development and ecological protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Wu & Xuelu Liu & Qiqi Zhao & Hongyan Liu & Fei Qu & Miaomiao Zhang, 2024. "Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies—A Case Study of Gangu County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5929-:d:1433445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5929/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5929/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borut Stojilković, 2022. "Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    3. Daowei Zhang & Anne Stenger, 2015. "Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 129-140, July.
    4. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2014. "Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 124-132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Xiaoyu Li & Shudan Gong & Qingdong Shi & Yuan Fang, 2023. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. Nicholas M. Holden & Andrew M. Neill & Jane C. Stout & Derek O’Brien & Michael A. Morris, 2023. "Biocircularity: a Framework to Define Sustainable, Circular Bioeconomy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 77-91, March.
    6. Jie Chen & Hui Fu & Shengtian Chen, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value at the City Level from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecological” Spaces: A Case Study of Haikou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Xiao Zhang & Jun Wang & Mingyue Zhao & Yan Gao & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Variations of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand on the Southeast Hilly Area of China: Implications for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Ana Carolina V. Nadalini & Ricardo de Araujo Kalid & Ednildo Andrade Torres, 2021. "Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Yang, Qing & Liu, Gengyuan & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & M.V.B. Almeida, Cecília & Casazza, Marco, 2020. "Emergy-based ecosystem services valuation and classification management applied to China’s grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    10. Chaoxu Luan & Renzhi Liu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Various Land Use and Land Cover Change Models to Predict Ecosystem Service Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Tianhai Zhang & Yaqin Qu & Yang Liu & Guanfeng Yan & Greg Foliente, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Response of Ecosystem Service Values to Land Use Change in Xiamen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Buonocore, Elvira & Picone, Flavio & Donnarumma, Luigia & Russo, Giovanni F. & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2019. "Modeling matter and energy flows in marine ecosystems using emergy and eco-exergy methods to account for natural capital value," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 137-146.
    13. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    16. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Olszańska, Agnieszka & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2022. "Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.
    18. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Joel C. Creed & Laura Sol Aranda & Júlia Gomes de Sousa & Caio Barros Brito do Bem & Beatriz Sant’Anna Vasconcelos Marafiga Dutra & Marianna Lanari & Virgínia Eduarda de Sousa & Karine M. Magalhães & , 2023. "A Synthesis of Provision and Impact in Seagrass Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Southwest Atlantic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Paletto, Alessandro & Pastorella, Fabio & Granvik, Madeleine & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2018. "Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 411-424.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5929-:d:1433445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.