IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5856-d1431884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study on the Operational Performance Evaluation of a Manufacturing Process and System (MaPS) Sustainability Analysis Tool for Engineering Education

Author

Listed:
  • Kamyar Raoufi

    (School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

  • Karl R. Haapala

    (School of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

Abstract

As the future product and process design decision-makers, students in engineering should have knowledge of sustainability and its application in industry. However, educators are challenged in training students in these concepts. Existing analysis tools are deficient in supporting sustainability assessment by nonexperts. To address this gap, the Manufacturing Process and System (MaPS) Sustainability Analysis tool was developed under the Constructionism in Learning: Sustainable Life Cycle Engineering (CooL:SLiCE) project. The technical aspects of developing a framework and its associated proof-of-concept MaPS Sustainability Analysis tool are reported in a separate study. Herein, the educational aspects of the MaPS Sustainability Analysis tool and its operational performance in terms of ease of use and usefulness to assess its suitability for the classroom are investigated. Undergraduate and graduate engineering students at Tampere University and Oregon State University were recruited to use and evaluate the tool. Through application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), it was determined that the 24 study participants found the tool easy to use and useful in analyzing product design, manufacturing process, and supply chain sustainability performance. To move this proof of concept toward general use, key software operational characteristics and a GUI should be investigated to improve efficiency, effectiveness, satisfaction, and learnability of the MaPS Sustainability Analysis tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamyar Raoufi & Karl R. Haapala, 2024. "A Case Study on the Operational Performance Evaluation of a Manufacturing Process and System (MaPS) Sustainability Analysis Tool for Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5856-:d:1431884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susana Romero & Marian Aláez & Daniel Amo & David Fonseca, 2020. "Systematic Review of How Engineering Schools around the World Are Deploying the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leire Guerenabarrena-Cortazar & Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri & Ernesto Cilleruelo-Carrasco, 2021. "Integration of Sustainability in Engineering and Architectural Studies in Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Francisco A. Pujol & David Tomás, 2020. "Introducing Sustainability in a Robotic Engineering Degree: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Mantoura Nakad & Linda Gardelle & Rami J. Abboud, 2024. "A Systematic Review of the Different Methods Assessing Sustainability Integration in Engineering Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. David Kongpiwatana Narong & Philip Hallinger, 2024. "Traversing the Evolution of Research on Engineering Education for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review (1991–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Julie Milovanovic & Tripp Shealy & Andrew Katz, 2021. "Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Yaneth Vásquez & Deyvis Cano & Fernando Valenzuela, 2023. "Research Thesis for Undergraduate Engineering Programs in the Digitalization Era: Learning Strategies and Responsible Research Conduct Road to a University Education 4.0 Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5856-:d:1431884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.