IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4549-d1403086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of the Different Methods Assessing Sustainability Integration in Engineering Curricula

Author

Listed:
  • Mantoura Nakad

    (FoAP Research Unit, Cnam Paris, ENSTA Bretagne, 29806 Brest Cedex 9, France
    FOE Dean’s Office, Faculty of Engineering, University of Balamand, Koura Campus, Kelhat P.O. Box 100, Lebanon)

  • Linda Gardelle

    (FoAP Research Unit, Department of Human and Social Sciences, ENSTA Bretagne, 29806 Brest Cedex 9, France)

  • Rami J. Abboud

    (FOE Dean’s Office, Faculty of Engineering, University of Balamand, Koura Campus, Kelhat P.O. Box 100, Lebanon)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, numerous studies have highlighted the significance of integrating sustainability into higher education. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in the literature on engineering education for sustainable development, emphasizing the inclusion of this concept within engineering curricula and recognizing the pivotal role that engineers play in achieving the sustainable development goals. Therefore, sporadic engineering faculties worldwide have begun acknowledging and assessing issues related to sustainability in their curricula. As several methods have been employed to assess its inclusion, the aim of this paper is to review the various methods used to gauge how sustainability is incorporated in their respective engineering curricula. We carried out a systematic review of the literature regarding sustainability as assessed specifically in engineering curricula using the Scopus and ERIC databases. We applied PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology and, as a result, 30 papers were included. The results produced 14 methods with the articles highlighting existing limitations. Therefore, the authors recommend the combination of at least two of the methods to efficiently evaluate sustainability in engineering curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Mantoura Nakad & Linda Gardelle & Rami J. Abboud, 2024. "A Systematic Review of the Different Methods Assessing Sustainability Integration in Engineering Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4549-:d:1403086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susana Romero & Marian Aláez & Daniel Amo & David Fonseca, 2020. "Systematic Review of How Engineering Schools around the World Are Deploying the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leire Guerenabarrena-Cortazar & Jon Olaskoaga-Larrauri & Ernesto Cilleruelo-Carrasco, 2021. "Integration of Sustainability in Engineering and Architectural Studies in Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Francisco A. Pujol & David Tomás, 2020. "Introducing Sustainability in a Robotic Engineering Degree: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. David Kongpiwatana Narong & Philip Hallinger, 2024. "Traversing the Evolution of Research on Engineering Education for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review (1991–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Kamyar Raoufi & Karl R. Haapala, 2024. "A Case Study on the Operational Performance Evaluation of a Manufacturing Process and System (MaPS) Sustainability Analysis Tool for Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Julie Milovanovic & Tripp Shealy & Andrew Katz, 2021. "Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Carlos Cacciuttolo & Yaneth Vásquez & Deyvis Cano & Fernando Valenzuela, 2023. "Research Thesis for Undergraduate Engineering Programs in the Digitalization Era: Learning Strategies and Responsible Research Conduct Road to a University Education 4.0 Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4549-:d:1403086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.