IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5810-d1431087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Energy Trading Mechanism Based on Individual Level Carbon Quota

Author

Listed:
  • Di Wang

    (School of Accountancy, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China)

  • Daozhi Zhao

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Fang Chen

    (School of Management, Research Center for Management Innovation and Evaluation, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Xin Tang

    (Shanghai Tongyi Investment Management Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China)

Abstract

High economic growth is accompanied by substantial consumption of fossil energy and significant negative externalities on the ecological environment. The global warming effect resulting from environmental pollution caused by energy has brought energy carbon emissions into the forefront of social attention. Establishing a carbon trading market is an essential measure to achieve the “double carbon” goal, with individual and household carbon emissions accounting for 70% of China’s total emissions. Constructing an individual-level carbon trading market will facilitate the efficient realization of this goal. However, addressing the challenge of handling vast amounts of data and network congestion in relation to frequent but small-scale individual carbon trading has become an urgent issue that needs to be resolved. In light of this, the present study designs a digital technology-based framework for the carbon market trading system and proposes an individual carbon asset price-based model for carbon market trading, aiming to establish a research framework for the carbon quota market. Furthermore, blockchain technology is employed as the underlying technology in the proposed carbon trading market model to cater to individual-level carbon trading services and achieve optimal matching between carbon quota suppliers, thereby enhancing profitability of the carbon trading platform. The numerical results obtained from the model demonstrate that in absence of government subsidy mechanisms, individual-level carbon trading can effectively reduce total consumer emissions. The present study successfully overcomes the carbon lock-in effect of consumer groups and achieves the generation and trading of individual carbon assets despite capital constraints. This study facilitates accumulation and trade of individual carbon resources, reduces overall consumer emissions, enhances environmental benefits at societal level, and provides a foundation for governmental decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Wang & Daozhi Zhao & Fang Chen & Xin Tang, 2024. "Research on Energy Trading Mechanism Based on Individual Level Carbon Quota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5810-:d:1431087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5810/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5810/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shujie Wang & Mohammed Habes Ibrahiem & Mengyu Li, 2022. "Motivations Influencing Alipay Users to Participate in the Ant Forest Campaign: An Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Qingxian An & Kefan Zhu & Beibei Xiong & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Carbon resource reallocation with emission quota in carbon emission trading system," Post-Print hal-03974850, HAL.
    3. Tian, Xin & Chang, Miao & Lin, Chen & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2014. "China’s carbon footprint: A regional perspective on the effect of transitions in consumption and production patterns," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 19-28.
    4. Burgess, Martin, 2016. "Personal carbon allowances: A revised model to alleviate distributional issues," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 316-327.
    5. Liu, Yue & Tian, Lixin & Sun, Huaping & Zhang, Xiling & Kong, Chuimin, 2022. "Option pricing of carbon asset and its application in digital decision-making of carbon asset," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Ning, Bo & Zhang, Xinjian & Liu, Xinyi & Yang, Chao & Li, Guanyu & Ma, Qian, 2022. "Allocation of carbon quotas with local differential privacy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    7. An, Kangxin & Zhang, Shihui & Huang, Hai & Liu, Yuan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiwen Fu & Shuxin Wang, 2022. "How to Promote Low-Carbon Cities with Blockchain Technology? A Blockchain-Based Low-Carbon Development Model for Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Hoda M. Aboalsamh & Laith T. Khrais & Sami A. Albahussain, 2023. "Pioneering Perception of Green Fintech in Promoting Sustainable Digital Services Application within Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Liu, Hanjie & Zhu, Yuanguo, 2024. "Carbon option pricing based on uncertain fractional differential equation: A binomial tree approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 13-28.
    4. Yong Bian & Zhi Yu & Xuelan Zeng & Jingchun Feng & Chao He, 2018. "Achieving China’s Long-Term Carbon Emission Abatement Targets: A Perspective from Regional Disparity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Mi, Zhifu & Zhang, Yunkun & Guan, Dabo & Shan, Yuli & Liu, Zhu & Cong, Ronggang & Yuan, Xiao-Chen & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1073-1081.
    6. Daoyan Guo & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long, 2019. "What Role Should Government Play in the Personal Carbon Trading Market: Motivator or Punisher?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Li, Meng & Gao, Yuning & Meng, Bo & Yang, Zhusong, 2021. "Managing the mitigation: Analysis of the effectiveness of target-based policies on China's provincial carbon emission and transfer," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Yelin Dai & Yue Liu & Xuhui Ding & Chundu Wu & Yu Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation Promotes Eco-Efficiency through Industrial Transfer: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-31, August.
    9. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    10. Chu, Junfei & Hou, Tianteng & Li, Feng & Yuan, Zhe, 2024. "Dynamic bargaining game DEA carbon emissions abatement allocation and the Nash equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Yuling Sun & Junsong Jia & Min Ju & Chundi Chen, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Direct Carbon Emission and Policy Implication of Energy Transition for China’s Residential Consumption Sector by the Methods of Social Network Analysis and Geographically We," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Zhao, Hongyan & Zhang, Qiang & Huo, Hong & Lin, Jintai & Liu, Zhu & Wang, Haikun & Guan, Dabo & He, Kebin, 2016. "Environment-economy tradeoff for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei’s exports," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 926-935.
    13. Anna Christy & Marwa Elnahass & Jaime Amezaga & Anthony Browne & Oliver Heidrich, 2024. "A dynamic framework to align company climate reporting and action with global climate targets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3103-3128, May.
    14. Shuntian Xu & Huaxuan Wang & Xin Tian & Tao Wang & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2022. "From efficiency to equity: Changing patterns of China's regional transportation systems from an in‐use steel stocks perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 548-561, April.
    15. Katharina Bohnenberger, 2020. "Money, Vouchers, Public Infrastructures? A Framework for Sustainable Welfare Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Siying Yang & Wenxuan Sun & Zhouyi Wu & Yang He, 2022. "Can the SO2 emission trading system promote urban emission reduction?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 963-974, June.
    17. Leying Wu & Zheng Wang, 2017. "Examining drivers of the emissions embodied in trade," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Jiansheng Qu & Lina Liu & Jingjing Zeng & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Zhiqiang Zhang, 2022. "City-Level Determinants of Household CO 2 Emissions per Person: An Empirical Study Based on a Large Survey in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Fan, Dian & Chen, Shaoqing, 2024. "No pain, no gain? Simulation of carbon reduction potential and socioeconomic effects of voluntary carbon trading in China during 2021–2060," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    20. Tan, Xueping & Wang, Xinyu & Zaidi, Syed Haider Ali, 2019. "What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon-trading scheme? A case study of Guangzhou Pilot, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5810-:d:1431087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.