IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5631-d1426534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Spatial Equity of Urban Park Green Space Layout from the Perspective of Resident Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Geyang Xia

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Guofeng He

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Xun Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

Urban park green spaces (UPGS) are essential resources for improving the urban ecological environment and meeting residents’ recreational needs. However, during rapid urbanization, the layout of UPGS often exhibits spatial inequity, with significant differences in the resources enjoyed by resident groups with different socioeconomic attributes. Accurately assessing the spatial equity of the UPGS layout (the equal accessibility of UPGS) is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and promoting social equity. This study takes the main urban area of Nanjing as an example and utilizes location-based service (LBS) data and multi-source geographic data to conduct an in-depth characterization of residents’ socioeconomic attributes, recreational behaviors, and park green space layout at the street scale. By constructing indicators of resident heterogeneity and UPGS supply–demand matching degree, it reveals the differences in park green space accessibility among different social groups and locations and explores the correlation between resident heterogeneity and UPGS spatial equity. The study finds that the layout of UPGS in the main urban area of Nanjing exhibits significant spatial inequity, with generally poor accessibility to park green spaces in the central urban area and low-income communities. The higher degree of diversification of residents’ socioeconomic attributes leads to a lower level of UPGS spatial equity in their streets. The results of the big data analysis verify the significant impact of resident heterogeneity on the equity of park green space layout. This study reveals the spatial equity issues of UPGS layout from the perspective of resident heterogeneity, providing new ideas and evidence for optimizing the allocation of park green space resources. Future UPGS planning should pay more attention to the diversity of residents’ recreational needs, focus on improving the accessibility of park green spaces in central urban areas and low-income communities, and balance the interests and demands of different stakeholders through public participation mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Geyang Xia & Guofeng He & Xun Zhang, 2024. "Assessing the Spatial Equity of Urban Park Green Space Layout from the Perspective of Resident Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5631-:d:1426534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Zhiheng & Li, Peiran & Jin, YanXiu & Bharule, Shreyas & Jia, Ning & Li, Wenjing & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Using mobile phone big data to identify inequity of aging groups in transit-oriented development station usage: A case of Tokyo," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 65-75.
    2. Kai Zhang & Dong Yan, 2023. "Enhancing the Community Environment in Populous Residential Districts: Neighborhood Amenities and Residents’ Daily Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Chang Wang & Siyuan Wang & Yilun Cao & Haojun Yan & Yunyuan Li, 2023. "The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongwan Choi & Jessica Machado & Gunwoo Kim, 2024. "A Comparative Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Street Trees in Seoul for the Suggestion of Social Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Zhaoyang Liu & Heqing Huang & Juha Siikamäki & Jintao Xu, 2024. "Area-Based Hedonic Pricing of Urban Green Amenities in Beijing: A Spatial Piecewise Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(5), pages 1223-1248, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5631-:d:1426534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.