IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5557-d1425105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Prioritization of Thermal Environment Regulation Hotspots in Chengdu

Author

Listed:
  • Ziang Cai

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Mengmeng Gui

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Rui Chen

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Shan Wang

    (Chengdu Institute of Natural Resources Investigation and Utilization (Chengdu Satellite Application Technology Center), Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Dan Zhao

    (School of Tourism and Culture Industry, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China)

  • Peihao Peng

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Juan Wang

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Temperature condition in urban areas has a substantial impact on the well-being and safety of both urban residents and the ecosystems. Green spaces are crucial for mitigating urban heat impacts, and hence, their balanced supply and demand is essential. Due to rapid urbanization, Chengdu has had a significant increase in population, which has had an impact on the dynamic changes in its green space environment, making it a suitable case for our study. This study employs the high-temperature vulnerability framework to classify urban green spaces as entities that regulate the thermal environment. This classification is based on the analysis of ecosystem service supply and demand. The approach creates an assessment framework for managing the balance between the need for and availability of thermal environment regulation in urban green spaces. The study utilizes matching and a priority index to identify places in Chengdu where there are imbalances between supply and demand for services. Our findings suggest: (1) The demand for regulating the thermal environment in Chengdu’s green spaces is defined by three indices: thermal exposure, thermal sensitivity, and thermal adaptability. High-demand areas account for a relatively small proportion and exhibit a pattern of “global diffusion and local concentration”. (2) The supply capacity in Chengdu is determined by both the size of green spaces and the surface temperature. High-supply capacity areas are mainly located in the southeastern part of the city, and their distribution pattern is similar to that of green spaces. (3) The level of correspondence between the supply and demand in Chengdu varies significantly and can be classified into three categories: “insufficient supply and high demand”, “insufficient supply and low demand”, and “abundant supply and low demand”. Out of these, 32 units are located in the area with a shortage of supply, while 6 units are in the area with a significant imbalance of low supply and high demand. (4) The green space thermal environment regulation in Chengdu is categorized into four priority intervention levels: priority I, II, III, and IV zones. The priority IV zone, which has a high intervention priority level, consists of two units primarily located in the Inner Ring Qingyang, Inner Ring Jinjiang, Cuijiadian, Caotang, and Donghu, which are deemed crucial for needing prioritized regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziang Cai & Mengmeng Gui & Rui Chen & Shan Wang & Dan Zhao & Peihao Peng & Juan Wang, 2024. "Identification and Prioritization of Thermal Environment Regulation Hotspots in Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5557-:d:1425105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maragno, Denis & Gaglio, Mattias & Robbi, Martina & Appiotti, Federica & Fano, Elisa Anna & Gissi, Elena, 2018. "Fine-scale analysis of urban flooding reduction from green infrastructure: An ecosystem services approach for the management of water flows," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaekyoung Kim & Junsuk Kang, 2020. "Analysis of Flood Damage in the Seoul Metropolitan Government Using Climate Change Scenarios and Mitigation Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Anne-Katrin Schneider & Michael W. Strohbach & Mario App & Boris Schröder, 2019. "The ‘GartenApp’: Assessing and Communicating the Ecological Potential of Private Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Jian Tian & Suiping Zeng & Jian Zeng & Feiyang Jiang, 2022. "Assessment of Supply and Demand of Regional Flood Regulation Ecosystem Services and Zoning Management in Response to Flood Disasters: A Case Study of Fujian Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Gaglio, M. & Aschonitis, V. & Pieretti, L. & Santos, L. & Gissi, E. & Castaldelli, G. & Fano, E.A., 2019. "Modelling past, present and future Ecosystem Services supply in a protected floodplain under land use and climate changes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 23-34.
    7. Mattia Bertin & Eugenia Vincenti, 2024. "Eco-Zip: Climate-Proofing an International Logistic Hub," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Pia Minixhofer & Rosemarie Stangl, 2021. "Green Infrastructures and the Consideration of Their Soil-Related Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Xiao Ouyang & Zhenbo Wang & Xiang Zhu, 2019. "Construction of the Ecological Security Pattern of Urban Agglomeration under the Framework of Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services Using Bayesian Network Machine Learning: Case Study of the Changsh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Ryohei Ogawa & Ye Zhang & Vouchlay Theng & Zhongyu Guo & Manna Wang & Chihiro Yoshimura, 2023. "Capacity Assessment of Urban Green Space for Mitigating Combined Sewer Overflows in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Wenjing Wang & Tong Wu & Yuanzheng Li & Hua Zheng & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2021. "Matching Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand through Land Use Optimization: A Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Megacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Jian Wang & Fei Xue & Ruiying Jing & Qiaohui Lu & Yilong Huang & Xiang Sun & Wenbo Zhu, 2021. "Regenerating Sponge City to Sponge Watershed through an Innovative Framework for Urban Water Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, May.
    13. Izabela Godyń & Marek Bodziony & Agnieszka Grela & Krzysztof Muszyński & Justyna Pamuła, 2022. "Determination of Pollution and Environmental Risk Assessment of Stormwater and the Receiving River, Case Study of the Sudół River Catchment, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Karsten Rusche & Mario Reimer & Rico Stichmann, 2019. "Mapping and Assessing Green Infrastructure Connectivity in European City Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Xiaoyong Li & Wenhui Kuang & Fengyun Sun, 2020. "Identifying Urban Flood Regulation Priority Areas in Beijing Based on an Ecosystem Services Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Stefano Salata & Bertan Arslan, 2022. "Designing with Ecosystem Modelling: The Sponge District Application in İzmir, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    17. Sebastiani, A. & Buonocore, E. & Franzese, P.P. & Riccio, A. & Chianese, E. & Nardella, L. & Manes, F., 2021. "Modeling air quality regulation by green infrastructure in a Mediterranean coastal urban area: The removal of PM10 in the Metropolitan City of Naples (Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    18. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Fu, Bojie & Zhang, Liwei & Wu, Xutong & Li, Yingjie, 2022. "Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Denis Maragno & Carlo Federico dall’Omo & Gianfranco Pozzer & Francesco Musco, 2021. "Multi-Risk Climate Mapping for the Adaptation of the Venice Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    20. Mo Wang & Furong Chen & Dongqing Zhang & Qiuyi Rao & Jianjun Li & Soon Keat Tan, 2022. "Supply–Demand Evaluation of Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Based on the Model of Coupling Coordination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5557-:d:1425105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.