IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5536-d1424838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decisions and Coordination of E-Commerce Supply Chain Considering Product Quality and Marketing Efforts under Different Power Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Haiping Ren

    (Teaching Department of Basic Subjects, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zhen Luo

    (Business School, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of internet technology, consumers have increasingly higher requirements for product quality. High-quality products can win consumers’ trust. Enhancing both product quality and sales in e-commerce platform transactions has long been a focal point of research. To address this issue, this paper constructs Stackelberg game models under different power structures and compares their impacts on pricing decisions and profits within e-commerce supply chains. Numerical simulations are used to explore the optimal combination strategy for the interaction of product quality and marketing efforts in the e-commerce supply chain. The results show that: (1) Under a centralized decision-making model, product quality and marketing efforts reach their optimal values, maximizing benefits for the supply chain system. (2) Under different power structures, the relationship between the profits of the supplier and the e-commerce platform self-operator is closely linked to the cost coefficients of product quality and marketing efforts. (3) Through the mechanism of “cost-sharing + compensation contract”, the supplier can reduce wholesale price, and the e-commerce platform self-operator can subsidize a portion of the sales to the supplier, thereby maximizing the profits of both parties and achieving a win–win situation. The research in this paper aids suppliers in improving product quality and e-commerce platform self-operators in enhancing their marketing efforts, providing theoretical support for optimizing supply-chain decision making on e-commerce platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiping Ren & Zhen Luo, 2024. "Decisions and Coordination of E-Commerce Supply Chain Considering Product Quality and Marketing Efforts under Different Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5536-:d:1424838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5536/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5536/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Kasulaitis & Callie W. Babbitt & Anna Christina Tyler, 2021. "The role of consumer preferences in reducing material intensity of electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 435-447, April.
    2. Xing Wan & Jing Chen, 2019. "The relationship between platform choice and supplier’s efficiency- evidence from China’s online to offline (O2O)e-commerce platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(2), pages 153-166, June.
    3. Lu, Lijue & Menezes, Mozart B.C., 2024. "Supply chain vertical competition and product proliferation under different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    4. Terry A. Taylor, 2002. "Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 992-1007, August.
    5. Chunyan Fu & Susu Cheng & Yongxi Yi, 2019. "Dynamic Control of Product Innovation, Advertising Effort, and Strategic Transfer-Pricing in a Marketing-Operations Interface," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, February.
    6. Modak, Nikunja Mohan & Panda, Shibaji & Sana, Shib Sankar, 2016. "Three-echelon supply chain coordination considering duopolistic retailers with perfect quality products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 564-578.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Guitian & Gu, Chaocheng, 2021. "The value of target sales rebate contracts in a supply chain with downstream competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Yang, Jian & Qi, Xiangtong, 2009. "On the design of coordinating contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 581-594, December.
    3. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    7. Cao, Zong-Hong & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Zhao, Ju & Li, Chang-Wen, 2015. "Entry mode selection and its impact on an incumbent supply chain coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    9. Fan, Jianchang & Ni, Debing & Fang, Xiang, 2020. "Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 514-537.
    10. Wang, Deshen & Chen, Bintong & Chen, Jing, 2019. "Credit card fraud detection strategies with consumer incentives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 179-195.
    11. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Wang, Sheng-Dong, 2009. "Manufacturer-buyer coordination for newsvendor-type-products with two ordering opportunities and partial backorders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 958-974, November.
    12. Hui Zhang & Tao Huang & Tao Yan, 2022. "A quantitative analysis of risk-sharing agreements with patient support programs for improving medication adherence," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 253-274, June.
    13. Sule Birim & Cigdem Sofyalioglu, 2017. "Evaluating vendor managed inventory systems: how incentives can benefit supply chain partners," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, January.
    14. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    15. Chen, Xu & Li, Shanshan & Wang, Xiaojun, 2020. "Evaluating the effects of quality regulations on the pharmaceutical supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Qiuyun Zhu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Aijun Liu & Chong Gao & Lei Xu & Fan Zhao & Ding Zhang & Benjamin Lev, 2022. "Equilibrium Optimization with Multi-Energy-Efficiency-Grade Products: Government and Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Sarat Kumar Jena & Deepti Jog, 2017. "Price competition in a tourism supply chain," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(6), pages 1235-1254, September.
    18. Xuanming Su, 2008. "Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 566-589, May.
    19. Terry A. Taylor & Wenqiang Xiao, 2014. "Subsidizing the Distribution Channel: Donor Funding to Improve the Availability of Malaria Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2461-2477, October.
    20. Lin Chen & Jin Peng & Zhibing Liu & Ruiqing Zhao, 2017. "Pricing and effort decisions for a supply chain with uncertain information," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 264-284, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5536-:d:1424838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.