IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5367-d1421115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Ivannova Ruiz-Rojas

    (Departamento de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Universidad de Las Fuerzas Armadas, Sangolquí 170550, Ecuador)

  • Luis Salvador-Ullauri

    (Department of Software and Computing Systems, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Patricia Acosta-Vargas

    (Intelligent and Interactive Systems Laboratory, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador
    Carrera de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador)

Abstract

This study explores the impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on critical thinking and collaboration among university students, highlighting the importance of investigating these technologies due to their increasing integration into higher education and their potential to transform traditional pedagogical practices. A predominantly female sample was surveyed to assess their familiarity with and experience and perceptions of these tools. A total of 87% of the respondents had prior knowledge of generative AI tools, with 38% using them occasionally. Among the most popular tools are Canva 2024 (33%), Chat PDF (26%), and YOU.COM (24%). Additionally, 64% of the respondents believe that these tools significantly improve their critical thinking ability. Despite their high familiarity with and occasional use of these tools, the need for continuous training and technical support was identified. While generative AI tools show promising potential for enhancing collaboration and critical thinking in higher education, previous research has limitations, such as the lack of longitudinal data and the inadequacy in addressing ethical considerations and potential biases. More comprehensive research is needed to understand their long-term impact better and maximize their potential benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Ivannova Ruiz-Rojas & Luis Salvador-Ullauri & Patricia Acosta-Vargas, 2024. "Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5367-:d:1421115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lena Ivannova Ruiz-Rojas & Patricia Acosta-Vargas & Javier De-Moreta-Llovet & Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez, 2023. "Empowering Education with Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools: Approach with an Instructional Design Matrix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2024. "The Combined Use of GIS and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Potential Geodiversity Sites and Promoting Geoheritage," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Vikrant Vikram Singh & Nishant Kumar & Shailender Singh & Meenakshi Kaul & Aditya Kumar Gupta & P. K. Kapur, 2024. "Assessment of artificial intelligence-based digital learning systems in higher education amid the pandemic using analytic hierarchy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 4069-4084, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5367-:d:1421115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.