IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i13p5349-d1420733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Yang

    (School of Art and Design, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Yang Liu

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Abstract

Sustainable digital cultural heritage is now an essential aspect of our lives. The rapid development of 3D technology in the historic preservation industry provides the means of documenting, recovering, and presenting cultural heritage items. However, the digital transformation of 3D sculpture heritage is often led by technology without effective evaluation indicators as a guide. This study compares effective assessment methods for digital forms with traditional art. Our approach uses semantic differential scales and machine learning regression models to assess the importance of fifteen artistic attributes. The semantic differential scale is improved based on 15 artistic attributes and proves to be effective in evaluating the value of digital artwork. This research finds that digital artwork is significantly more popular among young people compared with elderly people, especially for attributes like colour variation, saturation, and texture. The research also finds that complexity and social attributes are more important in predicting the value of the digital 3D model. Digital transformation is a viable method for preserving the artistic value of sculpture and improving cultural sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Yang & Yang Liu, 2024. "Preserving Sculptural Heritage in the Era of Digital Transformation: Methods and Challenges of 3D Art Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5349-:d:1420733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antreas Kantaros & Evangelos Soulis & Elli Alysandratou, 2023. "Digitization of Ancient Artefacts and Fabrication of Sustainable 3D-Printed Replicas for Intended Use by Visitors with Disabilities: The Case of Piraeus Archaeological Museum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Sanja Tišma & Mira Mileusnić Škrtić & Sanja Maleković & Daniela Angelina Jelinčić, 2021. "Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Project Funding," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Hatem Tawfik Ahmed & Ashraf Mohamed Aly, 2023. "Recycled Waste Materials in Landscape Design for Sustainable Development (Al-Ahsa as a Model)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Jorien van Paasschen & Francesca Bacci & David P Melcher, 2015. "The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iman Ibrahim & Ayat Gamal Ashour & Waleed Zeiada & Nisreen Salem & Mohamed Abdallah, 2024. "A Systematic Review on the Technical Performance and Sustainability of 3D Printing Filaments Using Recycled Plastic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Yang Zhang & Changqi Dong, 2024. "Sustainable Development of Digital Cultural Heritage: A Hybrid Analysis of Crowdsourcing Projects Using fsQCA and System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Khaled M. Al-Saud & Rommel AlAli & Amira S. Abouelela & Adab M. Al Saud, 2024. "Exploring the Feasibility for Utilizing Recycled Palm Waste in Decorative Design Applications as Enhancements for Tourist Destinations: A Step toward Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Khaled Al-Saud & Rommel AlAli & Adab M. Al saud & Amira S. Abouelela & Rami Taha Shehab & Dalia Ali Abdel Moneim & Alaa Eldin. M. Hamid, 2024. "Exploring the Aesthetic and Functional Aspects of Recycled Furniture in Promoting Sustainable Development: An Applied Approach for Interior Design Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Marco Rossitti & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Financial Sustainability of Cultural Heritage Reuse Projects: An Integrated Approach for the Historical Rural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5349-:d:1420733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.