IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5163-d1416753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex Network-Based Resilience Assessment of the Integrated Circuit Industry Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Chuang Wang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China
    Industry School of Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Tianyi Zhang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China
    Industry School of Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Jing Jia

    (Department of State-Owned Asset Management, Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang 712000, China)

  • Jin Wang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China
    Industry School of Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Shan Ren

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China
    Industry School of Modern Post, Xi’an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

With the improvement of social production efficiency and the enhancement of the supply chain system, the traditional linear supply chain model is gradually evolving into a more complex and dynamic industrial chain network. This article uses complex network theory combined with the basic attributes of the industrial chain and supply chain to conduct a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the integrated circuit industry chain. Firstly, a cooperative network model of the integrated circuit industry chain in Shaanxi Province is established based on the supply chain relationships of enterprises. Secondly, the study analyzes the basic characteristics of the collaborative network model. Thirdly, this study explores the efficiency, resilience, and innovation capacity of industrial chains using a novel set of indexes: the industry chain efficiency index (ICEI), the industry chain resilience index (ICRI), and the industry chain innovation capability index (ICICI). By employing principal component analysis (PCA), the study provides a comprehensive evaluation of industrial chain performance. The findings reveal that the ICEI highlights the critical importance of average path length and network density, showing that shorter paths and higher density are associated with greater efficiency. The ICRI emphasizes the roles of average degree and standard deviation, indicating that higher connectivity and lower variability contribute to resilience. The ICICI identifies the clustering coefficient and network density as key factors, suggesting that tight-knit networks foster innovation. These results offer significant insights into the dynamics of industrial chain collaboration and provide practical recommendations for enhancing supply chain management. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through a case study. The results of the case study indicate the following: (1) Key Enterprises’ Identification: The analysis identified key enterprises like Samsung Semiconductor and HT-tech with the highest betweenness centrality, highlighting their crucial intermediary roles within the network; (2) Efficiency and Innovation Assessment: Compared with foreign-owned and other immigrant businesses, local businesses generally perform below average in terms of efficiency and resilience, indicating that there is room for improvement in technology adoption and innovation capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuang Wang & Tianyi Zhang & Jing Jia & Jin Wang & Shan Ren, 2024. "Complex Network-Based Resilience Assessment of the Integrated Circuit Industry Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5163-:d:1416753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5163/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5163/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sudusinghe, Jayani Ishara & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainability performance in circular economy: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Lianju Ning & Dan Yao, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Capabilities and Supply Chain Competitive Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Bertello, Alberto & De Bernardi, Paola & Santoro, Gabriele & Quaglia, Roberto, 2022. "Unveiling the microfoundations of multiplex boundary work for collaborative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1424-1434.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingyu Zhang & Aman Ullah & Sana Ashraf & Muhammad Abdullah, 2024. "Synergistic Impact of Internet of Things and Big-Data-Driven Supply Chain on Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Sergi, Bruno S. & Ključnikov, Aleksandr & Popkova, Elena G. & Bogoviz, Aleksei V. & Lobova, Svetlana V., 2022. "Creative abilities and digital competencies to transitioning to Business 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 401-411.
    3. Tian Chen & Ting-Hsin Hsu & Kuen-Suan Chen & Chun-Ming Yang, 2022. "A Fuzzy Improvement Testing Model of Bank APP Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Muhammad Waqas Farooq & Faiza Nawaz & Dr. Raja Irfan Sabir, 2024. "To Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages (SCA) Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Over Competitors," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 1026-1033.
    5. Juan Garcia-Pajoy & Nelson Paz Ruiz & Mario Chong & Ana Luna, 2023. "Utilising PLS-SEM and Km 2 Methodology in Urban Logistics Analysis: A Case Study on Popayan, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Levent Gun & Salih Zeki Imamoglu & Hulya Turkcan & Huseyin Ince, 2024. "Effect of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance in the Uncertain Environment: Transformational Leadership and Employee Self-Efficacy as Antecedents of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Benlu Xin & Wentao Zhang & Wei Zhang & Catherine Xiaocui Lou & Himanshu Kumar Shee, 2023. "Strategic Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Supply Chain Innovation from the Perspective of Collaborative Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. De Lima, Felipe Alexandre & Seuring, Stefan, 2023. "A Delphi study examining risk and uncertainty management in circular supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    9. Shima Mirzaei & Sajjad Shokouhyar, 2023. "Applying a thematic analysis in identifying the role of circular economy in sustainable supply chain practices," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4691-4722, May.
    10. Feliciano-Cestero, María M. & Ameen, Nisreen & Kotabe, Masaaki & Paul, Justin & Signoret, Mario, 2023. "Is digital transformation threatened? A systematic literature review of the factors influencing firms’ digital transformation and internationalization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Barrett, Gillian & Tsekouras, George, 2022. "A tango with a gorilla: An exploration of the microfoundations of open innovation partnerships between young innovative companies and multi-national enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Zikopoulos, Christos, 2022. "On the effect of upgradable products design on circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    13. Sgarbossa, Fabio & Arena, Simone & Tang, Ou & Peron, Mirco, 2023. "Renewable hydrogen supply chains: A planning matrix and an agenda for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Lehner, Roland, 2023. "Cross-Supply Chain Collaboration Platform for Pallet Management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 138753, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Rubee Singh & Shahbaz Khan & Piera Centobelli, 2022. "Investigating the Interplay between Social Performance and Organisational Factors Supporting Circular Economy Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Damianos P. Sakas & Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Nikos Kanellos & Christos Christopoulos & Kanellos S. Toudas, 2023. "Determining Factors for Supply Chain Services Provider Selection and Long-Term Relationship Maintenance: Evidence from Greece," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Sadaat Ali Yawar & Stefan Seuring, 2024. "Inside the world of stepsiblings: Linking global production networks to sustainable supply chain management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 788-805, February.
    19. Sgarbossa, Fabio & Arena, Simone & Tang, Ou & Peron, Mirco, 2022. "Reprint of: Renewable hydrogen supply chains: A planning matrix and an agenda for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    20. Monrudee Theeraworawit & Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Philip Hallinger, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in a Circular Economy: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5163-:d:1416753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.