IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5158-d1416645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Biogenetic Resources Conservation Policies Based on the Policy Modeling Consistency Index Model

Author

Listed:
  • Liwen Qi

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wenjing Chen

    (Department of Economic Management, Fujian Forestry Vocational and Technical College, Nanping 353000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chunyan Li

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xiaoting Song

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Lanqing Ge

    (Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Biogenetic resources are the foundation of biodiversity and are of great significance to the sustainability of human society. The effective promotion of biogenetic resource conservation depends on the scientific formulation and implementation of relevant policies, so the quantitative evaluation of biogenetic resource conservation policies can provide decision support for the next step of policy formulation. Based on text analysis, social network analysis, and the construction of the PMC index model, this study selected 132 policy samples issued by the Chinese government in the field of biogenetic resources, established an evaluation system for China’s biogenetic resources policies, which contains 10 first-level indicators and 55 s-level indicators, and drew the PMC curve diagram accordingly to quantitatively evaluate China’s biogenetic resources policies. The results show that China’s biogenetic resources policies are generally at a good level, which can meet the current practical needs of biogenetic resources conservation, but there are problems such as the lack of policy forecasts in the relevant policy texts, the lack of flexible planning in the short and medium term, the lack of co-operation among the policy issuers, and the insufficient guidance of innovation. Based on the results, this article puts forward suggestions for improving China’s biogenetic resource conservation policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liwen Qi & Wenjing Chen & Chunyan Li & Xiaoting Song & Lanqing Ge, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Biogenetic Resources Conservation Policies Based on the Policy Modeling Consistency Index Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5158-:d:1416645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matti Ylönen & Anna Salmivaara, 2021. "Policy coherence across Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from Finland," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 829-847, September.
    2. Anouk Fransen & Harriet Bulkeley, 2024. "Transnational Governing at the Climate–Biodiversity Frontier: Employing a Governmentality Perspective," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 24(1), pages 76-99, Winter.
    3. Jim Attridge, 2007. "Innovation Models In The Biopharmaceutical Sector," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Rifat A Atun & Desmond Sheridan (ed.), Innovation In The Biopharmaceutical Industry, chapter 1, pages 1-29, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Trommetter, Michel, 2005. "Biodiversity and international stakes: A question of access," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 573-583, June.
    5. Jim Attridge, 2007. "Innovation Models In The Biopharmaceutical Sector," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 215-243.
    6. Gollin, Douglas & Evenson, Robert, 2003. "Valuing animal genetic resources: lessons from plant genetic resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 353-363, July.
    7. Shengli Dai & Weimin Zhang & Jiamin Zong & Yingying Wang & Ge Wang, 2021. "How Effective Is the Green Development Policy of China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt? A Quantitative Evaluation Based on the PMC-Index Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Zhou & Xiang Yuan & Ziyuan Guo & Jianrui Wu & Ruijia Li, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Port: Evaluation of Green Port Policies on China’s Coasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Chenrui Lu & Bing Wang & Tinggui Chen & Jianjun Yang, 2022. "A Document Analysis of Peak Carbon Emissions and Carbon Neutrality Policies Based on a PMC Index Model in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Schreiner, Julia Anette, 2018. "Saving the breeds: German Farmers’ preferences for Endangered Dairy Breed conservation programs," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276866, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    4. Wenjuan Cheng & Alessio D’Amato & Giacomo Pallante, 2020. "Benefit sharing mechanisms for agricultural genetic diversity use and on-farm conservation," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(1), pages 337-355, April.
    5. Michel Trommetter, 2010. "Flexibility in the implementation of intellectual property rights in agricultural biotechnology," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 223-245, December.
    6. Yianna Lambrou & Regina Laub, 2006. "Gender, Local Knowledge, and Lessons Learnt in Documenting and Conserving Agrobiodiversity," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Guodong Huang & Xiaoqiang Shen & Xiaobin Zhang & Wei Gu, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Central-Level Land Consolidation Policies in the Past Forty Years Based on the Text Analysis and PMC-Index Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Trommetter, M. & Tropéano, J.P., 2009. "Do broad patents deter research cooperation ?," Working Papers 200904, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    9. Welch, Eric W. & Shin, Eunjung & Long, Jennifer, 2013. "Potential effects of the Nagoya Protocol on the exchange of non-plant genetic resources for scientific research: Actors, paths, and consequences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 136-147.
    10. Yiwen Liu & Jian Li & Yi Xu, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of High-Tech Industry Policies Based on the PMC-Index Model: A Case Study of China’s Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Deke, Oliver, 2004. "Der Preis des "Grünen Goldes": Informationen und Informationsdefizite über den Marktwert genetischer Ressourcen," Kiel Working Papers 1233, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Bangjun Wang & Qiaoqiao Xing, 2022. "Evaluation of the Wind Power Industry Policy in China (2010–2021): A Quantitative Analysis Based on the PMC Index Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Clevo Wilson & Clem Tisdell, 2005. "Globalisation, Concentration Of Genetic Material And Their Implications For Sustainable Development," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 198, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    14. Trommetter, M., 2008. "Intellectual property rights in agricultural and agro-food biotechnologies to 2030 (© OECD International Futures Programme)," Working Papers 200805, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    15. Xiangfei Ma & Yifan Ruan & Qiying Yang, 2023. "Evaluating China’s Common Prosperity Policies against the Background of Green Development by Using the PMC Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Bertacchini, Enrico E., 2008. "Coase, Pigou and the potato: Whither farmers' rights?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 183-193, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5158-:d:1416645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.