IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p5153-d1416558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Synergistic Effect of Urban Economic, Social and Space Factors on Residential Carbon Emissions: A Case Study on Provincial Capitals in China

Author

Listed:
  • Su Hang

    (Xi’an International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Technological Innovation in Green Urban-Rural and Land Space Smart Construction, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of International Economics and Business, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea)

  • Yang Juntao

    (Xi’an International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Technological Innovation in Green Urban-Rural and Land Space Smart Construction, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    School of Architecture, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Within the context of China’s commitment to carbon reduction goals, particularly in urban areas, addressing carbon emissions stemming from residents’ travel activities assumes paramount significance. Drawing upon established theoretical frameworks, this study advances several hypotheses delineating the determinants of low-carbon behaviors among urban residents. It analyzes panel data from 30 provincial capitals in China using a time–individual dual fixed effects model. This study empirically scrutinizes the posited theoretical model, aiming to elucidate the factors shaping urban residents’ low-carbon behavioral patterns and provide a decision-making basis for low-carbon construction and management of urban space. The findings underscore several notable associations. The disposable income, population density, and urban built-up areas exhibit significant positive correlations with carbon emissions among residents. Conversely, the urban gross domestic product (GDP) displays a significant negative correlation with carbon emissions. Furthermore, a positive correlation is discerned between the expanse of green spaces and the per capita carbon emissions intensity, while the availability of subway systems exhibits a negative correlation with both the per capita public green space area and the carbon emissions intensity. Notably, the configuration intensity of urban bus systems manifests an inverted U-shaped relationship with residents’ carbon emissions intensity. Specifically, within a certain threshold, an escalation in the bus equipment intensity coincides with heightened carbon emission intensity; however, beyond this threshold, a notable reduction in the per capita carbon emissions intensity ensues. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship is observed between the number of urban parks and residents’ carbon emissions intensity, indicating that an increase in parks may not necessarily contribute to carbon reduction efforts. Moreover, a discernible synergy is observed among various factors influencing carbon reduction efforts. These factors encompass residents’ education levels and disposable incomes, the presence of subway and regular public transportation systems, urban land utilization scales, economic development levels, green space provisions, public transportation infrastructure, population densities, and land equilibrium. This interplay underscores the interconnectedness and interdependence of diverse variables in shaping strategies for mitigating carbon emissions within urban contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Hang & Yang Juntao, 2024. "The Synergistic Effect of Urban Economic, Social and Space Factors on Residential Carbon Emissions: A Case Study on Provincial Capitals in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5153-:d:1416558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/5153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dantong Wang & Chun Yuan, 2018. "Modeling and forecasting household energy consumption and related CO2 emissions integrating UrbanSim and transportation models: an Atlanta BeltLine case study," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 448-462, May.
    2. Yan SUN & Yu ZHANG & Xuemin LIU, 2020. "Driving Factors of Transportation CO2 Emissions in Beijing: An Analysis from the Perspective of Urban Development," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Meangbua, Onicha & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Kuwornu, John K.M., 2019. "Factors influencing energy requirements and CO2 emissions of households in Thailand: A panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 521-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei, Mingyu & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can, 2022. "The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Xin Li & Xiaoqiong He & Xiyu Luo & Xiandan Cui & Minxi Wang, 2020. "Exploring the characteristics and drivers of indirect energy consumption of urban and rural households from a sectoral perspective," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 907-924, October.
    3. Chen, Peipei & Wu, Yi & Zhong, Honglin & Long, Yin & Meng, Jing, 2022. "Exploring household emission patterns and driving factors in Japan using machine learning methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Iania, Leonardo & Algieri, Bernardina & Leccadito, Arturo, 2022. "Forecasting total energy’s CO2 emissions," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022003, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    5. Shi, Xunpeng & Wang, Keying & Cheong, Tsun Se & Zhang, Hongwu, 2020. "Prioritizing driving factors of household carbon emissions: An application of the LASSO model with survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Liping Zhu & Zhizhong Li & Xubiao Yang & Yili Zhang & Hui Li, 2022. "Forecast of Transportation CO 2 Emissions in Shanghai under Multiple Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Lina Liu & Jiansheng Qu & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Yibo Niu & Jingjing Zeng & Lihua Zhang & Li Xu, 2020. "Household CO 2 Emissions: Current Status and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Marlene Ofelia Sanchez-Escobar & Julieta Noguez & Jose Martin Molina-Espinosa & David Escobar-Castillejos & Sergio Ruiz-Loza, 2023. "Policy Design for Electricity Efficiency: A Case Study of Bottom-Up Energy Modeling in the Residential Sector and Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-39, September.
    9. Xing, Peixue & Wang, Yanan & Ye, Tao & Sun, Ying & Li, Qiao & Li, Xiaoyan & Li, Meng & Chen, Wei, 2024. "Carbon emission efficiency of 284 cities in China based on machine learning approach: Driving factors and regional heterogeneity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Mustapha A. Sadiq & John K. M. Kuwornu & Ramatu M. Al-Hassan & Suhiyini I. Alhassan, 2019. "Assessing Maize Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change and Variability in Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Yuhao Yang & Ruixi Dong & Xiaoyan Ren & Mengze Fu, 2024. "Exploring Sustainable Planning Strategies for Carbon Emission Reduction in Beijing’s Transportation Sector: A Multi-Scenario Carbon Peak Analysis Using the Extended STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Du, Xiaoyi & Wu, Dongdong & Yan, Yabo, 2023. "Prediction of electricity consumption based on GM(1,Nr) model in Jiangsu province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    13. Xie, Jun & Zhou, Shaojie & Teng, Fei & Gu, Alun, 2023. "The characteristics and driving factors of household CO2 and non-CO2 emissions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Gui, Xuechen & Gou, Zhonghua, 2021. "Understanding green building energy performance in the context of commercial estates: A multi-year and cross-region analysis using the Australian commercial building disclosure database," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Miglė & Krikštolaitis, Ričardas & Liobikienė, Genovaitė, 2022. "The contribution of changes in climate-friendly behaviour, climate change concern and personal responsibility to household greenhouse gas emissions: Heating/cooling and transport activities in the Eur," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    16. Xueting Jin & Yu Li & Dongqi Sun & Jinzhou Zhang & Ji Zheng, 2019. "Factors Controlling Urban and Rural Indirect Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Household Consumption: A Case Study in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Jiayu Yang & Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Congying He & Shiyi Wang & Feng Li, 2024. "How Does Urban Scale Influence Carbon Emissions?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Yamei Chen & Lu Jiang, 2022. "Influencing Factors of Direct Carbon Emissions of Households in Urban Villages in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Marlene Ofelia Sanchez-Escobar & Julieta Noguez & Jose Martin Molina-Espinosa & Rafael Lozano-Espinosa & Genoveva Vargas-Solar, 2021. "The Contribution of Bottom-Up Energy Models to Support Policy Design of Electricity End-Use Efficiency for Residential Buildings and the Residential Sector: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    20. Sun, Mingxing & Xu, Xiangbo & Wang, Le & Li, Chang & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Stable energy, energy inequality, and climate change vulnerability in Pan-Third Pole regions: Empirical analysis in cross-national rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5153-:d:1416558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.