IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4934-d1411469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of ESG Ratings in Shaping Chinese Investors’ Decision-Making Behavior: An Analysis from the Fund Signaling Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzhou Qu

    (The Institute for Financial & Accounting Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Zekai Su

    (The Institute for Financial & Accounting Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

In order to promote the healthy development of China’s fund market and alleviate the phenomenon of “funds make money, investors don’t”, this paper explores the impact and economic consequences of fund signals on investors’ decisions in China. An analysis of quarterly Chinese fund data from January 2010 to December 2022 finds that Chinese investors tend to rely on strong signals and flow their money to highly rated or high-yielding funds. Sustainability is an integral part of ESG ratings, which have gradually become a focal point in the international investment market, but the lack of a platform to display ESG ratings in China has prevented investors from effectively utilizing these ratings in their investment decisions. The study also found that individual investors prefer short- and medium-term returns, while both institutional and individual investors chase ratings, with individual investors relying more on these signals. In addition, strong signals are not effective in predicting fund performance returns, while ESG ratings show significant positive predictive effects, validating the irrational preference of Chinese investors to blindly follow strong signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzhou Qu & Zekai Su, 2024. "The Role of ESG Ratings in Shaping Chinese Investors’ Decision-Making Behavior: An Analysis from the Fund Signaling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4934-:d:1411469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Durán-Santomil & Luis Otero-González & Renato Heitor Correia-Domingues & Juan Carlos Reboredo, 2019. "Does Sustainability Score Impact Mutual Fund Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Brad M. Barber & Xing Huang & Terrance Odean, 2016. "Which Factors Matter to Investors? Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(10), pages 2600-2642.
    3. Jonathan E. Alevy & Michael S. Haigh & John A. List, 2007. "Information Cascades: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Financial Market Professionals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 151-180, February.
    4. Jonathan Reuter & Eric Zitzewitz, 2021. "How Much Does Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? A Regression Discontinuity Approach [Mutual fund’s R2 as predictor of performance]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 25(5), pages 1395-1432.
    5. Chevalier, Judith & Ellison, Glenn, 1997. "Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1167-1200, December.
    6. Robin Greenwood & Andrei Shleifer, 2014. "Expectations of Returns and Expected Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(3), pages 714-746.
    7. Jonathan B. Berk & Richard C. Green, 2004. "Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(6), pages 1269-1295, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Philippe van der Beck & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Dario Villamaina, 2024. "Ponzi Funds," Papers 2405.12768, arXiv.org.
    3. Jennifer Huang & Kelsey D. Wei & Hong Yan, 2022. "Investor learning and mutual fund flows," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(3), pages 739-765, September.
    4. Noam Ben-Ze'ev, 2023. "Drivers of Flows-Performance Sensitivity in Mutual Funds," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2023.06, Bank of Israel.
    5. Rakowski, David & Yamani, Ehab, 2021. "Endogeneity in the mutual fund flow–performance relationship: An instrumental variables solution," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 247-271.
    6. James Brugler & Minsoo Kim & Zhuo Zhong, 2024. "Liquidity shocks and pension fund performance: Evidence from early access," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(2), pages 170-191, May.
    7. Yang Song, 2020. "The Mismatch Between Mutual Fund Scale and Skill," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(5), pages 2555-2589, October.
    8. Li, Zhiyong & Rao, Xiao, 2023. "Exploring the zoo of predictors for mutual fund performance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 2015. "Money Doctors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(1), pages 91-114, February.
      • Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, "undated". "Money Doctors," Working Paper 69721, Harvard University OpenScholar.
      • Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 2014. "Money Doctors," Scholarly Articles 12965657, Harvard University Department of Economics.
      • Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 2012. "Money Doctors," Working Papers 464, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
      • Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 2012. "Money Doctors," NBER Working Papers 18174, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, "undated". "Money Doctors," Working Paper 228501, Harvard University OpenScholar.
      • Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 2012. "Money doctors," Economics Working Papers 1355, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Fulkerson, Jon A. & Riley, Timothy B., 2019. "Portfolio concentration and mutual fund performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Kronlund, Mathias & Pool, Veronika K. & Sialm, Clemens & Stefanescu, Irina, 2021. "Out of sight no more? The effect of fee disclosures on 401(k) investment allocations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 644-668.
    12. Narasimhan Jegadeesh & Chandra Sekhar Mangipudi & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 0. "What Do Fund Flows Reveal about Asset Pricing Models and Investor Sophistication?," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 108-148.
    13. Coen, Patrick, 2021. "Information Loss over the Business Cycle," TSE Working Papers 21-1220, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    14. Fang, Dawei & Holmen, Martin & Mavruk, Taylan, 2021. "Meeting new peers: The effects of Morningstar category reassignment on fund flows and star ratings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Ramiro Losada, 2022. "La información pública periódica de los fondos de inversión: como influyen en las decisiones de los inversores," CNMV Documentos de Trabajo CNMV Documentos de Trabaj, CNMV- Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores - Departamento de Estudios y Estadísticas.
    16. David Hunter & Zhen Sun & Karen Benson, 2020. "The Exclusive Role of Centralized Fund Family Management," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 58(2), pages 199-236, December.
    17. Kozo Omori & Tomoki Kitamura, 2021. "Managers’ skills and fund flows in the Japanese mutual fund market," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 675-696, November.
    18. Gantchev, Nickolay & Giannetti, Mariassunta & Li, Rachel, 2024. "Sustainability or performance? Ratings and fund managers’ incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Qiyuan Peng & Sheri Tice & Ling Zhou, 2023. "Mutual funds and stock fundamentals," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1329-1361, May.
    20. Michel Verlaine, 2022. "Behavioral finance and the architecture of the asset management industry," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1454-1476, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4934-:d:1411469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.