IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1679-d493280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Rebate Strategy of Business-to-Customer Platforms Considering Recycling and Trade-Ins Simultaneously

Author

Listed:
  • Guojun Ji

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Zhongfeng Sun

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Kim Hua Tan

    (Nottingham University Business School, The University of Nottingham Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)

Abstract

B2C (business to customer) platforms like JD.com and Suning.com often cooperate with professional recycling companies, and implement recycling programs and trade-in programs simultaneously, especially for electronic products. The former means that platforms recycle old products from customers with cash, whereas the latter means that platforms allow customers to trade in old products for new ones. Under this background, we discuss how to develop the optimal rebate strategy for B2C platforms based on the market recovery price of old products, and give the optimal rebate prices and feasible conditions of single-rebate, dual-rebate, and none-rebate strategies. The results show that the single-recycling rebate strategy is dominant when the residual value of old products is low, and when the residual value of old products is high, platforms should choose in turn the single-trade-in rebate strategy, dual-rebate strategy, single-recycling rebate strategy, and non-rebate strategy with the increase in the cost of new products. In order to obtain higher profits, B2C platforms should provide appropriate rebates to better coordinate the recycling program and the trade-in program on the basis of the market recovery price, the residual value, and the durability of old products as well as the cost, the selling price, and the upgrade range of new products.

Suggested Citation

  • Guojun Ji & Zhongfeng Sun & Kim Hua Tan, 2021. "Collaborative Rebate Strategy of Business-to-Customer Platforms Considering Recycling and Trade-Ins Simultaneously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1679-:d:493280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Xiaoyan & Bian, Yiwen & Sun, Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal trade-in strategy of business-to-consumer platform with dual-format retailing model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 181-192.
    2. Chang Wang & Tingting Zhu & Hailin Yao & Qiao Sun, 2020. "The Impact of Green Information on the Participation Intention of Consumers in Online Recycling: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Zu-Jun Ma & Qin Zhou & Ying Dai & Gao-Feng Guan, 2018. "To License or Not to License Remanufacturing Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Yongbo Xiao & Sean X. Zhou, 2020. "Trade‐in for Cash or for Upgrade? Dynamic Pricing with Customer Choice," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 856-881, April.
    5. Shidi Miao & Di Liu & Junfeng Ma, 2020. "O2O Recycling Closed-Loop Supply Chain Modeling Based on Classification Process considering Environmental Index," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, April.
    6. Hammond, David & Beullens, Patrick, 2007. "Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium under legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 895-908, December.
    7. Miao, Zhaowei & Fu, Ke & Xia, Zhiqiang & Wang, Yu, 2017. "Models for closed-loop supply chain with trade-ins," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 308-326.
    8. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2018. "The interaction between product rollover strategy and pricing scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 116-135.
    9. Raghunath Singh Rao & Om Narasimhan & George John, 2009. "Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 950-967, 09-10.
    10. Liu, Jingchen & Zhai, Xin & Chen, Lihua, 2019. "Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-17.
    11. R. Canan Savaskan & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    13. Cao, Kaiying & Han, Guoxin & Xu, Bing & Wang, Jia, 2020. "Gift card payment or cash payment: Which payment is suitable for trade-in rebate?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Saibal Ray & Tamer Boyaci & Necati Aras, 2005. "Optimal Prices and Trade-in Rebates for Durable, Remanufacturable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 208-228, January.
    15. Preyas S. Desai & Devavrat Purohit & Bo Zhou, 2016. "The Strategic Role of Exchange Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 93-112, January.
    16. Hu, Shu & Ma, Zu-Jun & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for successive-generation products with strategic consumers and limited trade-in duration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 92-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Sijie & Jia, Dongfeng & Zheng, Bin, 2022. "The manufacturer’s trade-in partner choice and pricing in the presence of collection platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Hu, Shu & Tang, Yanli, 2024. "Impact of product sharing and heterogeneous consumers on manufacturers offering trade-in programs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Dou, Guowei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Does implementing trade-in and green technology together benefit the environment?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 517-533.
    4. Quan, Yuting & Hong, Jiangtao & Song, Jingpu & Leng, Mingming, 2021. "Game-theoretic analysis of trade-in services in closed-loop supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Li, Yongjian & Wang, Kun & Xu, Fangchao & Fan, Chunxing, 2022. "Management of trade-in modes by recycling platforms based on consumer heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Hu, Shu & Zhu, Stuart X. & Fu, Ke, 2023. "Optimal trade-in and refurbishment strategies for durable goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 133-151.
    7. Cao, Kaiying & Han, Guoxin & Xu, Bing & Wang, Jia, 2020. "Gift card payment or cash payment: Which payment is suitable for trade-in rebate?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li & Hetian Zhao, 2020. "Joint Advertisement and Trade-In Marketing Strategy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Wang, Wei & Feng, Lipan & Chen, Xiaoxu & Yang, Lei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2024. "Impacts of selling models: Who should offer trade-in programs in e-commerce supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Kaiying Cao & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "Optimal Trade‐in Return Policies: Is it Wise to be Generous?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1309-1331, March.
    11. Cao, Kaiying & Su, Yunyi & Han, Guoxin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2022. "Is it wise to offer rebates for unused extended warranties under trade-in programs in supply chains?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Li, Yongjian & Feng, Lipan & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Fangchao, 2019. "Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 751-766.
    13. Bian, Yiwen & Xie, Jiazheng & Archibald, Thomas W. & Sun, Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal extended warranty strategy: Offering trade-in service or not?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 240-254.
    14. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Quality choice for product recovery considering a trade-in program and third-party remanufacturing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Dong, Rong & Wang, Nengmin & Jiang, Bin & He, Qidong, 2023. "Within-brand or cross-brand: The trade-in option under consumer switching costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Xu, Yuqiu & Wang, Jia & Cao, Kaiying, 2024. "Dynamic joint strategy of channel encroachment and logistics choice considering trade-in service and strategic consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 22-40.
    18. Das, Debabrata & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Product return management through promotional offers: The role of consumers’ loss aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Xiaoyan & Bian, Yiwen & Sun, Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal trade-in strategy of business-to-consumer platform with dual-format retailing model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 181-192.
    20. Sungwook Yoon & Sukjae Jeong, 2017. "Investment Strategy in a Closed Loop Supply Chain: The Case of a Market with Competition between Two Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-32, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1679-:d:493280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.