IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p95-d1304808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Empathy for Justice: A Methodology for Expansive Teacher Professional Development through Creative Body-Based Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Simon N. Leonard

    (Centre for Change and Complexity in Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Deborah Devis

    (Centre for Change and Complexity in Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Belinda MacGill

    (Centre for Educational and Social Inclusion, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Paul Unsworth

    (Centre for Change and Complexity in Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Jill Colton

    (Centre for Educational and Social Inclusion, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Sam Fowler

    (Centre for Change and Complexity in Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

Abstract

This paper reports from a design-based research project seeking to reduce bullying, and so, contribute to the sustainability goal of improving (understanding of) justice. Goals such as this call for holistic and interdisciplinary ways of thinking that are quite at odds with the linear and reductionist epistemologies available with globally dominant ‘neoliberal’ discourses on education and educational decision making. To achieve goals such as improving justice, sustainable education and educators must explore and champion expansive ways of knowing that acknowledge and celebrate the complexity of everyday learning contexts. Responding to this need, this paper presents a case study of how we, as a group of educational designers and teacher educators, have explored how the arts-based pedagogy known as Creative Body-Based-Learning, when coupled with Engeström’s expansive theory of learning, can provide an alternative structure and methodology for teacher professional knowledge production. The paper will also outline the use of the research methodology of computer-aided phenomenography as a means of evaluating this kind of complex learning where simple testing and self-reporting are typically inadequate.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon N. Leonard & Deborah Devis & Belinda MacGill & Paul Unsworth & Jill Colton & Sam Fowler, 2023. "Enhancing Empathy for Justice: A Methodology for Expansive Teacher Professional Development through Creative Body-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:95-:d:1304808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/95/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/95/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mona Holmqvist & Per Selin, 2019. "What makes the difference? An empirical comparison of critical aspects identified in phenomenographic and variation theory analyses," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Hewett, David G. & Watson, Bernadette M. & Gallois, Cindy & Ward, Michael & Leggett, Barbara A., 2009. "Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: Implications for quality of patient care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1732-1740, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gifford, Rachel & Molleman, Eric & van der Vaart, Taco, 2024. "It's a jungle out there: Understanding physician payment and its role in group dynamics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    2. Reiss, Michael & Greene, Carolyn A. & Ford, Julian D., 2017. "Is it time to talk? Understanding specialty child mental healthcare providers' decisions to engage in interdisciplinary communication with pediatricians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 66-71.
    3. Ovretveit, John, 2009. "The contribution of new social science research to patient safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1780-1783, December.
    4. Nugus, Peter & Carroll, Katherine & Hewett, David G. & Short, Alison & Forero, Roberto & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "Integrated care in the emergency department: A complex adaptive systems perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(11), pages 1997-2004, December.
    5. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    6. Lanham, Holly Jordan & Leykum, Luci K. & Taylor, Barbara S. & McCannon, C. Joseph & Lindberg, Curt & Lester, Richard T., 2013. "How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care: Understanding the role of self-organization in variation across local contexts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 194-202.
    7. Peter Wehnert & Christoph Kollwitz & Christofer Daiberl & Barbara Dinter & Markus Beckmann, 2018. "Capturing the Bigger Picture? Applying Text Analytics to Foster Open Innovation Processes for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Bromley, Elizabeth, 2012. "Building patient-centeredness: Hospital design as an interpretive act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(6), pages 1057-1066.
    9. Iedema, Rick, 2009. "New approaches to researching patient safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1701-1704, December.
    10. Huang, Lijuan & Mou, Jian & See-To, Eric W.K. & Kim, Jongki, 2019. "Consumer perceived value preferences for mobile marketing in China: A mixed method approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 70-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:95-:d:1304808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.