IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p34-d1303345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Research to Determine the Perception of the Tangible Cultural Architectural Heritage of Erzurum Castle and Its Surroundings in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Elif Akpinar Külekçi

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Mustafa Özgeriş

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Işık Sezen

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Ayşe Karahan

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Science, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey)

  • Faris Karahan

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Atatürk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey)

Abstract

The city center of Erzurum in the east of Turkey, Erzurum province, has structures with origins from the Anatolian Seljuk and Ilkhanid Periods to the present day, including the “Erzurum Castle”, “Ulu Mosque”, “Double Minaret Madrasa”, “Yakutiye Madrasa”, and “Three Kumbets.” It is home to one of the most important cultural heritages of Eastern Anatolia in history and faith tourism. Erzurum can be considered as the cradle of many cultures and civilizations with its deep historical past. Restoration (renovation) works around these monuments, which also contribute to the city’s identity, are important in terms of preserving historical monuments for the future. In this study, the importance of landscape projects and housing restorations in the city and its surroundings, in terms of harmony with the historical environment and monuments and urban identity, was investigated. In the questionnaire prepared for this purpose, we attempted to determine the perceptions of the protection, appreciation, and contribution aspects of the urban renewal works conducted in the tangible architectural heritage areas centered on Erzurum castle. The questionnaires, which included 5-point Likert-type questions, were distributed to 400 people. We sought the opinions of experts in decision-making mechanisms and academicians, as well as local people. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the city is generally not sensitive enough about the protection of historical neighbourhoods and monuments, and urban transformation projects do not contribute to conservation efforts in terms of conservation, sustainability, and visual perception. In addition, in terms of visual perception, it has been revealed that the newly developing regions of the city do not offer housing projects compatible with the historical environment, and that the relevant studies conducted are insufficient. The study also revealed that Erzurum Castle plays a central role in the perception of the historical environment. In terms of sustainability perception, it was determined that architectural restoration and landscape works have positive effects on cultural tourism, urban attractiveness, sense of belonging, quality of life, and prevention of migration. The prepared questions were divided into three groups: conservation sensitivity and perception, visual perception, and sustainability perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Elif Akpinar Külekçi & Mustafa Özgeriş & Işık Sezen & Ayşe Karahan & Faris Karahan, 2023. "A Research to Determine the Perception of the Tangible Cultural Architectural Heritage of Erzurum Castle and Its Surroundings in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:34-:d:1303345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/34/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/34/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniele Ronsivalle, 2023. "Relevance and Role of Contemporary Architecture Preservation—Assessing and Evaluating Architectural Heritage as a Contemporary Landscape: A Study Case in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Italian Architectural Heritage and Photovoltaic Systems. Matching Style with Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Feran Aşur & Elif Akpinar Kulekci & Muhsine Perihan, 2022. "The role of urban landscapes in the formation of urban identity and urban memory relations: the case of Van/Turkey," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 841-857, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farzaneh Karimi & Aliakbar Kamari, 2024. "Adapting Sustainability Certification Systems for Historic Buildings: A Qualitative Comparative Study in Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Cristina S. Polo López & Elena Lucchi & Eleonora Leonardi & Antonello Durante & Anne Schmidt & Roger Curtis, 2021. "Risk-Benefit Assessment Scheme for Renewable Solar Solutions in Traditional and Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Ivo Araújo & Leonel J. R. Nunes & António Curado, 2023. "Photovoltaic Production Management under Constrained Regulatory Requirements: A Step towards a Local Energy Community Creation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Oluwatobi Mary Owojori & Chioma Sylvia Okoro & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Francesca Ciampa & Stefania De Medici & Serena Viola & Maria Rita Pinto, 2021. "Regeneration Criteria for Adaptive Reuse of the Waterfront Ecosystem: Learning from the US Case Study to Improve European Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Wojciech Bal & Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska & Maja Nieścior, 2023. "The Importance of Architectural Icons of the City of Szczecin for the Transformation of Landscape Identity and Promotion of the City’s Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-37, May.
    7. Chen, Qi & Li, Xinyuan & Zhang, Zhengjia & Zhou, Chao & Guo, Zhiling & Liu, Zhengguang & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Remote sensing of photovoltaic scenarios: Techniques, applications and future directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    8. Lucchi, Elena, 2022. "Integration between photovoltaic systems and cultural heritage: A socio-technical comparison of international policies, design criteria, applications, and innovation developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Yi Liu & Yifan Zhang & Xiaolin Zhang & Fangfei Han & Ying Zhao, 2023. "A geographical perspective on the formation of urban nightlife landscape," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Lucchi, Elena & Dall'Orto, Isabella & Peluchetti, Alessia & Toledo, Linda & Pelle, Martina & Polo López, Cristina & Guazzi, Giulia, 2022. "Photovoltaic technologies in historic buildings and protected areas: Comprehensive legislative framework in Italy and Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Cristina S. Polo López & Floriana Troia & Francesco Nocera, 2021. "Photovoltaic BIPV Systems and Architectural Heritage: New Balance between Conservation and Transformation. An Assessment Method for Heritage Values Compatibility and Energy Benefits of Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:34-:d:1303345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.