IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p297-d1309465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Green Innovation of Livestock Product Three-Level Supply Chain Traceability System: A Value Co-Creation Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yuemei Ding

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Dequan Zheng

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Xiaoyu Niu

    (School of Computer and Information Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

Abstract

To enhance the health and stability of livestock product supply chains, it is imperative to augment product sustainability and satisfy food safety requirements through collaborative green innovation. Digital traceability technology amalgamates information and resources from stakeholders in the supply chain, facilitating knowledge sharing and product tracking throughout the entire process to purify the supply chain environment. Augmenting communication and trust among supply chains paves the way for green innovation, thereby yielding value-added benefits. Consequently, this paper formulates a simulation model for manufacturers, retailers, and consumers—three pivotal stakeholders in the traceability process of livestock products—from a value co-creation standpoint. It also incorporates a contract penalty mechanism to probe the collaborative green innovation process among various entities involved in the livestock product supply chain. System simulation is employed to emulate the evolution path of collaborative green innovation in the livestock product supply chain under the value co-creation perspective. Subsequently, a stepwise penalty mechanism, green incentive mechanism, and fair distribution mechanism are proposed for stakeholders to actualize collaborative green innovation and value creation. The findings reveal that: (1) the collaborative green behavior between suppliers, retailers, and consumers is influenced by factors such as value co-creation excess returns, innovative technology costs like traceability, cost sharing among stakeholders, and a certain threshold of government penalties. (2) A balanced distribution of excess returns and cost-sharing among stakeholders fosters the evolution of a green collaborative state in the supply chain, thereby achieving sustainable development with value chain enhancement and ecological optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuemei Ding & Dequan Zheng & Xiaoyu Niu, 2023. "Collaborative Green Innovation of Livestock Product Three-Level Supply Chain Traceability System: A Value Co-Creation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:297-:d:1309465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Anil Kumar & Arvind Upadhyay, 2023. "How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 551-569, January.
    2. Sara Saberi & Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis & Lejia Shen, 2019. "Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2117-2135, April.
    3. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Anna Walaszczyk & Małgorzata Koszewska & Iwona Staniec, 2022. "Food Traceability as an Element of Sustainable Consumption—Pandemic-Driven Changes in Consumer Attitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Patrizia Gazzola & Enrica Pavione & Arianna Barge & Franco Fassio, 2023. "Using the Transparency of Supply Chain Powered by Blockchain to Improve Sustainability Relationships with Stakeholders in the Food Sector: The Case Study of Lavazza," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Wenjian Wu & Li Deng & Yu Tao & Xin Wang & Wen-Tsao Pan, 2022. "Research on Evolutionary Game of Value Co-Creation Behavior of Shared Private Charging Piles of Electric Vehicles," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-11, August.
    7. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    8. Carlson, Jamie & Wyllie, Jessica & Rahman, Mohammad M. & Voola, Ranjit, 2019. "Enhancing brand relationship performance through customer participation and value creation in social media brand communities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 333-341.
    9. Jill E. Hobbs, 2019. "Heterogeneous consumers and differentiated food markets: Implications for quality signaling in food supply chains," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(3), pages 237-249, September.
    10. Giannis-Panagiotis Botilias & Spiridoula V. Margariti & Jeries Besarat & Dimitrios Salmas & George Pachoulas & Chrysostomos Stylios & Dimitris Skalkos, 2023. "Designing and Developing a Meat Traceability System: A Case Study for the Greek Meat Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    12. Ting Kong & Taiwen Feng & Yufei Huang & Junya Cai, 2020. "How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation: A perspective of knowledge‐based view," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1106-1121, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Ciwei & Huang, Qianzhi & Pan, Yuqing & Ng, Chi To & Liu, Renjun, 2023. "Logistics outsourcing: Effects of greenwashing and blockchain technology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Javeed, Sohail Ahmad & Akram, Umair, 2024. "The factors behind block-chain technology that boost the circular economy: An organizational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushal, Vikrant & Shashi,, 2023. "Role of customer perceived brand ethicality in inducing engagement in online brand communities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Algharabat, Raed & Rana, Nripendra P. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Baabdullah, Abdullah & Gupta, Ashish, 2020. "Investigating the antecedents of customer brand engagement and consumer-based brand equity in social media," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Zhiwen Su & Mingyu Zhang & Wenbing Wu, 2021. "Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Zhong, Yuanguang & Yang, Tong & Yu, Huilin & Zhong, Shuneng & Xie, Wei, 2023. "Impacts of blockchain technology with government subsidies on a dual-channel supply chain for tracing product information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Andreini, Daniela & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2020. "Brand community integration, participation and commitment: A comparison between consumer-run and company-managed communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 481-494.
    8. Cheung, Man Lai & Pires, Guilherme D. & Rosenberger, Philip J. & Leung, Wilson K.S. & Salehhuddin Sharipudin, Mohamad-Noor, 2021. "The role of consumer-consumer interaction and consumer-brand interaction in driving consumer-brand engagement and behavioral intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Miao Li & Ying Hua & Junxuan Zhu, 2021. "From Interactivity to Brand Preference: The Role of Social Comparison and Perceived Value in a Virtual Brand Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Sarasvuo, Sonja & Rindell, Anne & Kovalchuk, Marina, 2022. "Toward a conceptual understanding of co-creation in branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 543-563.
    11. Limin Su & Yongchao Cao & Wenjuan Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Operation Decisions and Coordination Strategies Considering the Consumers’ Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Muhammad Junaid & Khalid Hussain & Abdul Basit & Fujun Hou, 2020. "Nature of brand love: examining its variable effect on engagement and well-being," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 284-299, May.
    14. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    15. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    16. Minguez, Ana & Javier Sese, F., 2022. "Why do you want a relationship, anyway? Consent to receive marketing communications and donors’ willingness to engage with nonprofits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 356-367.
    17. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Prabal Chakraborty & Moumita Poddar, 2020. "Role of Multiple Stakeholders in Value Co-creation and Effects on Medical Tourism," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, June.
    19. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    20. Eman Abdelhamid Hasnin, 2018. "A Mediating Role of Customer Value Between Customer Engagement and Loyalty: An Applied Study in Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 136-144, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:297-:d:1309465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.