IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7520-d1139116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scale Effects on Shear Strength of Rough Rock Joints Caused by Normal Stress Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayi Shen

    (Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China
    Key Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Chenhao Sun

    (Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Huajie Huang

    (Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Jiawang Chen

    (Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China)

  • Chuangzhou Wu

    (Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China
    Key Laboratory of Offshore Geotechnics and Material of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Scale effects on the mechanical behavior of rock joints have been extensively studied in rocks and rock-like materials. However, limited attention has been paid to understanding scale effects on the shear strength of rock joints in relation to normal stress σ n applied to rock samples under direct shear tests. In this research, a two-dimensional particle flow code (PFC2D) is adopted to build a synthetic sandstone rock model with a standard joint roughness coefficient (JRC) profile. The manufactured rock model, which is adjusted by the experiment data and tested by the empirical Barton’s shear strength criterion, is then used to research scale effects on the shear strength of rock joints caused by normal stresses. It is found that the failure type can be affected by JRC and σ n . Therefore, a scale effect index (SEI) that is equal to JRC plus two times σ n (MPa) is proposed to identify the types of shear failure. Overall, shearing off asperities is the main failure mechanism for rock samples with SEI > 14, which leads to negative scale effects. It is also found that the degree of scale effects on the shear strength of rock joints is more obvious at low normal stress conditions, where σ n < 2 MPa.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayi Shen & Chenhao Sun & Huajie Huang & Jiawang Chen & Chuangzhou Wu, 2023. "Scale Effects on Shear Strength of Rough Rock Joints Caused by Normal Stress Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7520-:d:1139116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuai Li & Qi Huang & Boyi Hu & Jilong Pan & Junyu Chen & Jianguo Yang & Xinghui Zhou & Xinmin Wang & Haoxuan Yu, 2023. "Mining Method Optimization of Difficult-to-Mine Complicated Orebody Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Yong Luo & Yakun Wang & Heng Guo & Xiaobo Liu & Yihui Luo & Yanan Liu, 2022. "Relationship between Joint Roughness Coefficient and Statistical Roughness Parameters and Its Sensitivity to Sampling Interval," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jahanbani, Zeinab & Ataee-pour, Majid & Mortazavi, Ali, 2024. "Application of Z-numbers theory to study the influencing criteria in underground mining method selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7520-:d:1139116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.