Author
Listed:
- Congjun Yuan
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China
National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Guizhou Libo Karst Forest Ecosgstem, Libo 558403, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Haodong Wang
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China
National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Guizhou Libo Karst Forest Ecosgstem, Libo 558403, China
College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xiaoyong Dai
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China
National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Guizhou Libo Karst Forest Ecosgstem, Libo 558403, China)
- Meng Chen
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China)
- Jun Luo
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China)
- Rui Yang
(College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)
- Fangjun Ding
(Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550005, China
National Positioning Observation and Research Station of Guizhou Libo Karst Forest Ecosgstem, Libo 558403, China)
Abstract
Soil microbes play an important role in the microbial circulation and energy flow of ecosystems. In order to understand the change in the rhizosphere soil microbial community structure and function in the heterogeneous karst habitats, the nutrient content and enzyme activity were analyzed, and Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology was used to detect the composition, quantity and functional types of the rhizosphere soil microbial community in Rhododendron pudingense under three kinds of karst microhabitats (soil surface, rock gully and rock surface) in Wangmo Country (WM), Zhenning Country (ZN) and Qinglong Country (QL). The results showed that SS and RG microhabitats had a higher nutrient content and enzyme activity, while RS had the lowest. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria and Actinomycetes were dominant in terms of bacteria, while Ascomycota and Basidiomycotina were dominant in terms of fungi. There was no significant difference in microbial diversity among different karst microhabitats ( p > 0.05). At the microbial genus level, there were some differences in species composition among the three karst microhabitats, which may lead to soil heterogeneity in karst microhabitats. WM was a little different from ZN and QL. The results of PCoA showed that the community composition of RG and RS was more similar to that of SS. There was no significant difference in microbial functional types among different microhabitats ( p > 0.05). Only the abundance of pathothoph-symbiothoph fungi in RG was significantly higher than that in RS ( p < 0.05). The main function of bacteria was metabolism, and saprophytic and symbiotic fungi were the dominant fungal group. In conclusion, soil organic carbon and alkaline phosphatase are important factors affecting the level distribution of microflora in different karst microhabitats. R. pudingense in the SS and RG microhabitats has better soil conditions, which may require protection for the plants in the RS microhabitat. The current study results can provide a theoretical basis for the adaptation mechanism of Rhododendron pudingense to the karst microhabitat.
Suggested Citation
Congjun Yuan & Haodong Wang & Xiaoyong Dai & Meng Chen & Jun Luo & Rui Yang & Fangjun Ding, 2023.
"Effect of Karst Microhabitats on the Structure and Function of the Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community of Rhododendron pudingense,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7104-:d:1131275
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7104-:d:1131275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.