IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7030-d1129981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Governance within Public Participation and National Audit for Reducing Corruption

Author

Listed:
  • Huishui Su

    (Fujian Provincial Social Science Research Base, Finance and Accounting Research Center of Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Yu Lu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Oleksii Lyulyov

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland
    Department of Marketing, Sumy State University, 2, Rimskoho-Korsakova St., 40007 Sumy, Ukraine)

  • Tetyana Pimonenko

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland
    Department of Marketing, Sumy State University, 2, Rimskoho-Korsakova St., 40007 Sumy, Ukraine)

Abstract

The globalization process and acceptance of a new paradigm for world development aimed at attaining sustainable development require extending the concept of good governance, which allows the improvement of institutional quality. At the same time, governance performance depends on corruption and public participation in national audits. The paper aimed to analyze the impact of public participation in national audits on corruption governance. The object of investigation was 30 Chinese provinces for 2008–2017. The study applied a regression model with the preventive, exposed, and defensive functions of audits. The findings showed that the “governance view” of the audit is the root cause of the audit. In addition, the “immune system” function of national audits has an inhibitory effect on corruption, among which the deterrent effect of the defense function is the most-influential. The influence of public participation in national audits on corruption governance is mainly reflected in the deterrence and resistance function of national audits. The paper contributes to audit theory by incorporating the public participation mechanism, improving the governance path of “national audit—public participation—corruption governance”. It allows improving the national audit “immune system” function by considering the democratic connotation of decision-making and developing a good governance environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Huishui Su & Yu Lu & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Good Governance within Public Participation and National Audit for Reducing Corruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7030-:d:1129981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julien Vrydagh, 2022. "Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 65-88, March.
    2. Jian Zhang, 2018. "Public Governance and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Recent Anti-corruption Campaign in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 375-396, March.
    3. Hua Liu & Sheng Ge, 2020. "Research on Audit Supervision of Internet Finance," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Shane Leong & James Hazelton, 2019. "Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 811-835, May.
    5. Romualdas GINEVICIUS & Katarzyna SZCZEPANSKAWOSZCZYNA & Marek SZARUCKI & Andrius STASIUKYNAS, 2021. "Assessing Alternatives To The Development Of Administrativeeconomic Units Applying The Fare-M Method," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 6-24, June.
    6. Claudio Ferraz & Frederico Finan, 2011. "Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1274-1311, June.
    7. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    8. Maarten Corten & Tensie Steijvers & Nadine Lybaert & Céline Coeckelbergs, 2021. "The Influence of the CEO on Auditor Choice in Private Firms: An Interplay of Willingness and Ability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Xuhui Ding & Yong Chen & Min Li & Narisu Liu, 2022. "Booster or Killer? Research on Undertaking Transferred Industries and Residents’ Well-Being Improvements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Feng Yi & Zhijun Gao & Honglie Helen Zhang, 2018. "What leads to official corruption in China? A politico-economic analysis of economic opportunities and government corruption across China’s provinces," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 273-289, May.
    11. An, Weihua & Kweon, Yesola, 2017. "Do higher government wages induce less corruption? Cross-country panel evidence," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 809-826.
    12. Juan L. Gandía & David Huguet, 2020. "Audit fees and cost of debt: differences in the credibility of voluntary and mandatory audits," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 3071-3092, January.
    13. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-12-2015-2361 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ege, Matthew S. & Stuber, Sarah B., 2022. "Are auditors rewarded for low audit quality? The case of auditor lenience in the insurance industry," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1).
    15. Yanliu Lin & Stijn Kant, 2021. "Using Social Media for Citizen Participation: Contexts, Empowerment, and Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Thomas Webler & Seth Tuler, 2021. "Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 503-518, March.
    17. Madelijne Gorsira & Adriaan Denkers & Wim Huisman, 2018. "Both Sides of the Coin: Motives for Corruption Among Public Officials and Business Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 179-194, August.
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2017-2964 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Dingzu Zhang & Xingjie Shen & Cong Peng, 2022. "National Audit, Media Attention, and Efficiency of Local Fiscal Expenditure: A Spatial Econometric Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Sergii Bogachov & Aleksy Kwilinski & Boris Miethlich & Viera Bartosova & Aleksandr Gurnak, 2020. "Artificial intelligence components and fuzzy regulators in entrepreneurship development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 487-499, December.
    21. Serhiy Lyeonov & Tetyana Vasilyeva & Yuriy Bilan & Kseniya Bagmet, 2021. "Convergence of the institutional quality of the social sector: the path to inclusive growth," International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 272-291.
    22. Bo Rothstein, 2014. "What is the opposite of corruption?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 737-752, May.
    23. Malik, Ashish & Froese, Fabian Jintae, 2022. "Corruption as a perverse Innovation: The dark side of digitalization and corruption in international business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 682-693.
    24. Lee D. Parker & Kerry Jacobs & Jana Schmitz, 2018. "New public management and the rise of public sector performance audit," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 280-306, November.
    25. Faure-Grimaud, Antoine & Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Martimort, David, 1999. "The endogenous transaction costs of delegated auditing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4-6), pages 1039-1048, April.
    26. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergh, Andreas & Erlingsson, Gissur & Gustafsson, Anders & Wittberg, Emanuel, 2018. "Municipally owned enterprises: Nested principal-agent relations and conditions for accountability," Ratio Working Papers 306, The Ratio Institute, revised 18 Oct 2018.
    2. Muhammad Syauqi Qur’ani Putra Ariva & Ermawati, 2020. "Determinants Influencing the Level of Corruption in Indonesia Local Governments," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 34-42.
    3. Wenwu Cai & Xiaofeng Quan & Gary Gang Tian, 2023. "Local Corruption and Trade Credit: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 563-594, July.
    4. Patrick Velte, 2023. "The link between corporate governance and corporate financial misconduct. A review of archival studies and implications for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 353-411, February.
    5. Lee, Jeoung Yul & Park, Byung Il & Ghauri, Pervez N. & Kumar, Vikas, 2024. "Corruptive practices, digitalization, and international business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Kuo, Nan-Ting & Lee, Cheng-Few, 2024. "Public governance and the demand for corporate governance: The role of political institutions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    7. Zhong, Xi & Ren, Liuyang & Song, Tiebo, 2021. "Different effects of internal and external tournament incentives on corporate financial misconduct: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 329-341.
    8. Riaz, Zahid & Ray, Pradeep & Ray, Sangeeta, 2022. "The impact of digitalisation on corporate governance in Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 410-424.
    9. Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Souhir Neifar & Khamoussi Halioui, 2022. "Multilevel optimal managerial incentives and audit fees to limit earnings management practices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 587-610, April.
    10. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    11. Francesco Decarolis & Raymond Fisman & Paolo Pinotti & Silvia Vannutelli, 2019. "Rules, Discretion, and Corruption in Procurement: Evidence from Italian Government Contracting," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-344, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    12. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    13. Yeon‐Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, 2008. "Strategic judgment proofing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 926-948, December.
    14. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    15. Hartarska, Valentina M. & Nadolnyak, Denis A., 2012. "Financing Constraints and Access to Credit in Post Crisis Environment: Evidence from New Farmers in Alabama," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124882, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    17. Fabbri, Daniela & Menichini, Anna Maria C., 2016. "The commitment problem of secured lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 561-584.
    18. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    20. DEGEORGE, François & DING, Yuan & JEANJEAN, Thomas & STOLOWY, Hervé, 2005. "Does Analyst Following Curb Earnings Management?," HEC Research Papers Series 810, HEC Paris.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7030-:d:1129981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.