IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6808-d1126385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Parking Recommendation Methods Considering Travelers’ Decision Behaviors and Psychological Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Huanmei Qin

    (Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Ning Xu

    (Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yonghuan Zhang

    (Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Qianqian Pang

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 214135, China)

  • Zhaolin Lu

    (Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Intelligent parking services can provide parking recommendations and reservations for travelers. They are an effective method for solving the cruising for parking problems in big cities. This research conducted a sequential parking decision behavior survey and analyzed travelers’ parking choices and reservation behaviors at different stages of the travel process. Then, a parking recommendation model was established to consider the travelers’ psychological thresholds and the attention to parking factors. The effects of different parking recommendation schemes in different situations were further explored based on parking simulations. It was concluded that travelers were more willing to accept and use the parking recommendation system. A total of 56% of travelers chose to make parking reservations during the travel process. The satisfaction proportion of the psychological threshold for the parking reservation group was higher than that for the non-parking reservation group. A dynamic parking recommendation scheme with a regulation threshold can change the recommendation strategy according to the overall utilization of parking lots. The implementation of the scheme can not only improve travelers’ parking experience, but it can also effectively balance the utilization of parking resources. It can be applied to different parking utilization situations and produce good performance. The research results provide references for the design and application of intelligent parking services in order to solve parking problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Huanmei Qin & Ning Xu & Yonghuan Zhang & Qianqian Pang & Zhaolin Lu, 2023. "Research on Parking Recommendation Methods Considering Travelers’ Decision Behaviors and Psychological Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6808-:d:1126385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for parking," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 479-486, November.
    2. Yating Zhu & Xiaofei Ye & Jun Chen & Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang, 2020. "Impact of Cruising for Parking on Travel Time of Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren, 2006. "An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 418-442, November.
    4. Soto, Jose J. & Márquez, Luis & Macea, Luis F., 2018. "Accounting for attitudes on parking choice: An integrated choice and latent variable approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 65-77.
    5. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2016. "Curbside parking pricing in a city centre using a threshold," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 16-27.
    6. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt55s7079f, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Cao, Jin & Menendez, Monica, 2018. "Quantification of potential cruising time savings through intelligent parking services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 151-165.
    8. Tian, Qiong & Yang, Li & Wang, Chenlan & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for reservation-based parking system: A revenue management method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Xizhen & Lv, Mengqi & Ji, Yanjie & Zhang, Shuichao & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Pricing curb parking: Differentiated parking fees or cash rewards?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 46-58.
    2. Gürcan Sarısoy & Hüseyin Onur Tezcan, 2024. "Does Parking Type Preference Behavior Differ According to Whether It Is Paid or Free? A Case Study in Istanbul, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Huang, Hai-Jun & Guo, Ren-Yong & Xiong, Fen, 2021. "Linear location-dependent parking fees and integrated daily commuting patterns with late arrival and early departure in a linear city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 293-322.
    2. Wei Wang & Yuwei Zhou & Jianbin Liu & Baofeng Sun, 2022. "On-Street Cruising for Parking Model in Consideration with Gaming Elements and Its Impact Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Xu, Xiaoming & Chen, Jiajia, 2021. "Equilibrium analysis of parking for integrated daily commuting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Tian, Qiong & Yang, Li & Wang, Chenlan & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Dynamic pricing for reservation-based parking system: A revenue management method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-44.
    5. Gu, Ziyuan & Safarighouzhdi, Farshid & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H., 2021. "A macro-micro approach to modeling parking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 220-244.
    6. Xinliu Sui & Xiaofei Ye & Tao Wang & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen & Bin Ran, 2022. "Microscopic Simulating the Impact of Cruising for Parking on Traffic Efficiency and Emission with Parking-and-Visit Test Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Zhou, Xizhen & Lv, Mengqi & Ji, Yanjie & Zhang, Shuichao & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Pricing curb parking: Differentiated parking fees or cash rewards?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 46-58.
    8. Fan Wu & Wei Ma, 2022. "Clustering Analysis of the Spatio-Temporal On-Street Parking Occupancy Data: A Case Study in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    10. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans RA Koster & Leonardo Nunes & Jos van Ommeren, 2021. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-015/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Ostermeijer, Francis & Koster, Hans & Nunes, Leonardo & van Ommeren, Jos, 2022. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Groote, Jesper De & Ommeren, Jos Van & Koster, Hans R.A., 2016. "Car ownership and residential parking subsidies: Evidence from Amsterdam," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 25-37.
    13. Inci, Eren & Lindsey, Robin, 2015. "Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-59.
    14. van Ommeren, Jos & Wentink, Derk & Dekkers, Jasper, 2011. "The real price of parking policy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 25-31, July.
    15. Wang, Pengfei & Guan, Hongzhi & Liu, Peng, 2020. "Modeling and solving the optimal allocation-pricing of public parking resources problem in urban-scale network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 74-98.
    16. Caicedo, Felix & Diaz, Alejandra, 2013. "Case analysis of simultaneous concessions of parking meters and underground parking facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 358-378.
    17. Semeneh Hunachew Bayih & Surafel Luleseged Tilahun, 2024. "Dynamic vehicle parking pricing. A review," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(1), pages 35-59.
    18. Geva, Sharon & Fulman, Nir & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2022. "Getting the prices right: Drivers' cruising choices in a serious parking game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 54-75.
    19. Fu, Yulan & Wang, Chenlan & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2021. "Parking management in the morning commute problem with ridesharing," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Wei Wu & Wei Liu & Fangni Zhang & Vinayak Dixit, 2021. "A New Flexible Parking Reservation Scheme for the Morning Commute under Limited Parking Supplies," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 513-545, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6808-:d:1126385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.