IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6525-d1121589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Factors Influencing the Perception of Urban Park Recreational Behavior Based on the “Homo Urbanicus” Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Ren

    (School of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    School of Arts, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Qiusheng Yang

    (School of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

The improvement of the quality of urban parks plays a vital role in the construction and development of urban society. This study examined the factors influencing recreational satisfaction with urban parks, providing a reference for measures to improve the quality of urban parks. Based on the theory of “Homo Urbanicus”, we conducted a factor analysis of recreation satisfaction with urban parks and constructed a structural equation model. It can be seen from the analysis results produced by the causal model that “supporting facilities” and “functional facilities” have the highest contributions to the factor load of the model, which indicates that individual recreational satisfaction with urban parks is mainly based on the relationship between individuals and space conditions. In other words, these elements are necessary to meet the requirement of the “physical” in the “Homo Urbanicus” theory and to supplement the “physical–group–rational” method structure in the “Homo Urbanicus” theory. This conclusion indicates that the improvement of the “functional facilities” and “supporting facilities” of urban parks will play an important role in improving recreational satisfaction with urban parks. The results of this study can help researchers to build an urban park quality evaluation system from the perspective of recreation quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Ren & Qiusheng Yang, 2023. "Research on the Factors Influencing the Perception of Urban Park Recreational Behavior Based on the “Homo Urbanicus” Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6525-:d:1121589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siya Cheng & Ziling Huang & Haochen Pan & Shuaiqing Wang & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Comparative Study of Park Evaluation Based on Text Analysis of Social Media: A Case Study of 50 Popular Parks in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Daixin Dai & Mingyang Bo & Youmei Zhou, 2022. "How Do the Young Perceive Urban Parks? A Study on Young Adults’ Landscape Preferences and Health Benefits in Urban Parks Based on the Landscape Perception Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Huilin Liang & Qi Yan & Yujia Yan & Lang Zhang & Qingping Zhang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Study of Park Sentiments at Metropolitan Scale Using Multiple Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yating Chen & Luqi Li & Zhiji Tan & Chengcheng Ma & Binyan Wang & Qing Guo & Li Li, 2022. "Effects of Social Support and Loneliness on the Irrational Consumption Tendencies of Healthcare Products among the Elderly: A Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Nutthawut Ritmak & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Dimension of Health Sustainability Model after Pandemic Crisis Using Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaolu Yang & Jingyi Zhang & Yueyang Yu & Xiu-Juan Qiao, 2024. "Behavioral Conflicts in Urban Greenway Recreation: A Case Study of the “Three Rivers and One Mountain” Greenway in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyan Zhu & Jingzhu Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Tianhui Li & Wei Wang & Shanshan Fu & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Liang, Huilin & Yan, Yujia & Yan, Qi & Zhang, Qingping, 2024. "Development of green space provision for housing estates at metropolitan scale: A spatiotemporal assessment of proximity in a rapidly urbanizing Chinese city during the last 10 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Yunan Lin & Hongpeng Fu & Qikang Zhong & Zitu Zuo & Sihong Chen & Ziqiang He & Hao Zhang, 2024. "The Influencing Mechanism of the Communities’ Built Environment on Residents’ Subjective Well-Being: A Case Study of Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Chayada Kanokphanvanich & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Model for a Sustainable Healthcare Supply Chain Prioritizes Patient Safety: Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Identify Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Aida Nosrati & Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar & Chongxian Chen & Patrik Grahn, 2024. "Designing Stress-Relieving Small Inner-City Park Environments for Teenagers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Nattawut Pumpugsri & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "Development of a Safety Heavy-Duty Vehicle Model Considering Unsafe Acts, Unsafe Conditions and Near-Miss Events Using Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6525-:d:1121589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.