IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i7p1097-d1439225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Conflicts in Urban Greenway Recreation: A Case Study of the “Three Rivers and One Mountain” Greenway in Xi’an, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Yang

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Arts, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Jingyi Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Arts, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Yueyang Yu

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Arts, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Xiu-Juan Qiao

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Arts, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

The current greenway systems in China are relatively homogenous, whereas recreational groups and their needs are highly diverse. This discrepancy has resulted in increasingly severe behavioral conflicts during greenway recreation. However, scholarly research on behavioral conflicts in greenway recreational activities is lacking. Recreationists’ perceptions of conflict negatively impact their evaluation of the recreational experience, thereby limiting the ecological and recreational benefits of greenways. Therefore, it is crucial to categorize these conflicts, understand their formation mechanisms, and identify influencing factors, so as to put forward targeted management strategies for greenway construction. This study selected urban segments of greenways along the Wei and Feng rivers in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China. Field observation, semi-structured interviews, and NVivo 12 three-level coding were used to investigate and analyze the main types of behavioral conflicts perceived by various recreational groups on urban greenways and the factors influencing these perceptions. The results indicate that the primary types of behavioral conflicts are danger perception, space occupancy, environmental damage, and noise disturbance. Younger groups, highly educated individuals, local residents, and those with exercise as their primary recreational purpose are more likely to perceive conflicts. In addition, recreationists also focus on the completeness of greenway infrastructure, the richness of green landscapes, and the adequacy of behavior management. These findings can help greenway managers and planners understand the perception of recreational conflicts, enabling the formulation of targeted design strategies and management measures to mitigate these conflicts in urban greenway recreation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Yang & Jingyi Zhang & Yueyang Yu & Xiu-Juan Qiao, 2024. "Behavioral Conflicts in Urban Greenway Recreation: A Case Study of the “Three Rivers and One Mountain” Greenway in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1097-:d:1439225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/7/1097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Bo & Pang, Zhe & He, Dongsheng & Lu, Yi & Chen, Yujie, 2023. "Effects of neighborhood environment on different aspects of greenway use: Evidence from East Lake Greenway, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Haiyun Xu & Fan Fu & Meng Miao, 2022. "What Is the Effect of Cultural Greenway Projects in High-Density Urban Municipalities? Assessing the Public Living Desire near the Cultural Greenway in Central Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Yi Ren & Qiusheng Yang, 2023. "Research on the Factors Influencing the Perception of Urban Park Recreational Behavior Based on the “Homo Urbanicus” Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Carsten Mann & James Absher, 2008. "Recreation conflict potential and management implications in the northern/central Black Forest Nature Park," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 363-380.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyan Zhu & Jingzhu Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Tianhui Li & Wei Wang & Shanshan Fu & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Laura Siegwald & Carmen de Jong, 2020. "Anthropogenic Impacts on Water Quality in a Small, Forested Mountain Catchment: A Case Study of the Seebächle, Black Forest, Southern Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zheng Liu & Wanling Li & Duanyi Yan & Kai Yu, 2024. "Examining Property Value Increment along Greenways: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Maria Elena Menconi & Rosaria Abbate & Giulia Ceccarelli & Anna Grassi & David Grohmann, 2023. "Rural Slow Routes as Connectors of Local Communities for the Promotion of Place Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Vasile Gherheș & Ciprian Obrad, 2023. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Green Spaces and Daily Life in Small Urban Settings: Romanian Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee & Ludvig, Alice & Hogl, Karl, 2020. "Innovation development in forest ecosystem services: A comparative mountain bike trail study from Austria and Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Kristin Godtman Kling & Annika Dahlberg & Sandra Wall-Reinius, 2019. "Negotiating Improved Multifunctional Landscape Use: Trails as Facilitators for Collaboration Among Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee & Ludvig, Alice, 2019. "The role of social innovation in negotiations about recreational infrastructure in forests – A mountain-bike case study in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 227-235.
    11. Xue, Lan & Zhang, Yi, 2020. "The effect of distance on tourist behavior: A study based on social media data," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:1097-:d:1439225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.