IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6213-d1115863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Fiscal and Non-Fiscal Policies for Electric Vehicles—A Multi-Criterion Sorting Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Clímaco

    (ISCAC, Coimbra Polytechnic Institute, IPC, Quinta Agrícola, Bencanta, 3040-316 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Carlos Henggeler Antunes

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, INESC Coimbra—Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, University of Coimbra, Pólo II, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

This work presents a multi-criterion approach to evaluate the performance of countries regarding fiscal and non-fiscal policies for promoting electric vehicles. The ELECTRE TRI method is used to classify the performance of countries into categories according to the degree of fulfilment of those policies. This multi-criterion decision analysis method assigns the entities under evaluation to predefined ordered categories of merit (sorting problem). This is accomplished by comparing the entities under evaluation with reference profiles that establish the frontiers between the categories. The model considers fiscal (vehicle registration tax benefits, taxation of internal combustion engine company cars, consumer purchase incentives, tax shares in consumer prices of gasoline vs. electricity) and non-fiscal (traffic regulation incentives, charging infrastructure) potential policies to define a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria. The ELECTRE TRI method allows for robust conclusions by enabling the comparison of results obtained with different preference expression parameters, according to the distinct aims and scope of the decision problem. Illustrative results are presented allowing for the assessment of each country’s performance in this setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Clímaco & Carlos Henggeler Antunes, 2023. "Evaluation of Fiscal and Non-Fiscal Policies for Electric Vehicles—A Multi-Criterion Sorting Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6213-:d:1115863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sierzchula, William & Bakker, Sjoerd & Maat, Kees & van Wee, Bert, 2014. "The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 183-194.
    2. Bamidele Victor Ayodele & Siti Indati Mustapa, 2020. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Electric Vehicles: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Steven J. Davis & Zhu Liu & Zhu Deng & Biqing Zhu & Piyu Ke & Taochun Sun & Rui Guo & Chaopeng Hong & Bo Zheng & Yilong Wang & Olivier Boucher & Pierre Gentine & Philippe Ciais, 2022. "Emissions rebound from the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(5), pages 412-414, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Austmann, Leonhard M., 2021. "Drivers of the electric vehicle market: A systematic literature review of empirical studies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Ulrike Illmann & Jan Kluge, 2021. "Half Full or Half Empty? On the Importance of Nationwide Public Charging Infrastructure for the Development of Electromobility," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 28(05), pages 10-17, October.
    3. Gnann, Till & Stephens, Thomas S. & Lin, Zhenhong & Plötz, Patrick & Liu, Changzheng & Brokate, Jens, 2018. "What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? - A review of international PEV market diffusion models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 158-164.
    4. Priyan, S. & Matahen, Reem & Priyanshu, Deepa & Mouqdadi, Mahera, 2024. "Environmental strategies for a healthcare system with green technology investment and pandemic effects," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(1).
    5. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Cagli, Efe Caglar, 2023. "The volatility spillover between battery metals and future mobility stocks: Evidence from the time-varying frequency connectedness approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    7. Elena Higueras-Castillo & Sebastian Molinillo & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2020. "Potential Early Adopters of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles in Spain—Towards a Customer Profile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Wolbertus, Rick & van den Hoed, Robert & Kroesen, Maarten & Chorus, Caspar, 2021. "Charging infrastructure roll-out strategies for large scale introduction of electric vehicles in urban areas: An agent-based simulation study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 262-285.
    9. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Martínez-Lao, Juan & Montoya, Francisco G. & Montoya, Maria G. & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2017. "Electric vehicles in Spain: An overview of charging systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 970-983.
    11. Iogansen, Xiatian & Wang, Kailai & Bunch, David & Matson, Grant & Circella, Giovanni, 2023. "Deciphering the factors associated with adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in California: An investigation of latent attitudes, socio-demographics, and neighborhood effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Neaimeh, Myriam & Salisbury, Shawn D. & Hill, Graeme A. & Blythe, Philip T. & Scoffield, Don R. & Francfort, James E., 2017. "Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 474-486.
    13. Dowds, Jonathan & Howerter, Sarah & Hines, Paul & Aultman-Hall, Lisa, 2024. "Integrated Modeling of Electric Vehicle Energy Demand and Regional Electricity Generation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9nv8z4kc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Brito, Thiago Luis Felipe & Islam, Towhidul & Stettler, Marc & Mouette, Dominique & Meade, Nigel & Moutinho dos Santos, Edmilson, 2019. "Transitions between technological generations of alternative fuel vehicles in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. José M. Cansino & Antonio Sánchez-Braza & Teresa Sanz-Díaz, 2018. "Policy Instruments to Promote Electro-Mobility in the EU28: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Stergios Statharas & Yannis Moysoglou & Pelopidas Siskos & Pantelis Capros, 2021. "Simulating the Evolution of Business Models for Electricity Recharging Infrastructure Development by 2030: A Case Study for Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Zhongqi Deng & Peng Tian, 2020. "Are China's subsidies for electric vehicles effective?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 475-489, June.
    18. Wang, Ning & Tang, Linhao & Zhang, Wenjian & Guo, Jiahui, 2019. "How to face the challenges caused by the abolishment of subsidies for electric vehicles in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 359-372.
    19. Saiful Hasan & Terje Andreas Mathisen, 2020. "Policy measures for electric vehicle adoption. A review of evidence from Norway and China," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 25-46.
    20. Huang, Cui & Yang, Chao & Su, Jun, 2021. "Identifying core policy instruments based on structural holes: A case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6213-:d:1115863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.