IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6048-d1112645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overall Resilient Evaluation of Surrounding Rock of In-Service High-Speed Railway Tunnel Based on Information Fusion-Improved Fuzzy Matter-Element

Author

Listed:
  • Sihui Dong

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Shiqun Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Lu Yu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Xinyu Zhang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Jianbo Zhao

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

Abstract

Once the high-speed railway tunnel is put into use, its resilience will determine the possibility of permanent safety of the tunnel due to the closure of the structural space of the high-speed railway tunnel in service. Resilience theory is introduced into a risk analysis of operating high-speed rail tunnels to improve the ability to respond to risks in operating high-speed rail tunnels and to relieve the aging phenomenon caused by changes in the tunnel with time. First, an evaluation framework for the safety resilience of existing high-speed railway tunnels is constructed. Starting from the attributes of resilience such as resistance, adaptability, and resilience, and considering the characteristics of high-speed railway tunnels, protective measures, emergency management measures, and other factors, we fit the risk factors and probability of accident type of the high-speed railway tunnel and establish a tunnel safety resilience evaluation index system with 10 indexes. Secondly, the method of information fusion is used to combine subjective weighting and objective weighting. Then, the comprehensive weight of the evaluation index is obtained based on the principle of minimum discriminant information. Thirdly, the system resilience evaluation model based on the TOPSIS improved fuzzy matter-element is constructed to determine the classification criteria of resilience. On this basis, based on the temporal and spatial variability of the ductile tunnel, the concepts of ductile transition and ductile attenuation are introduced and the tunnel toughness optimization model is established to suppress the attenuation situation, enhance the transition ability, and then improve the system resilience level. On this basis, an optimal lifting scheme is obtained. Finally, taking Ai-Min tunnel of Ha-Mu high-speed railway as the engineering background, the flexibility of the resilience system is calculated, and the resilience grade (3) of the rock system surrounding the tunnel is obtained. Combined with the numerical model, improvement measures for specific tunnel facilities are proposed. The results show that the Ai-Min tunnel system has a general ability to resist external intrusion and prevent disasters, and the resilience level is general. It should focus on improving the resilience level of the transition index. The resilience evaluation results of the evaluation model are consistent with the actual situation of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihui Dong & Shiqun Li & Lu Yu & Xinyu Zhang & Jianbo Zhao, 2023. "Overall Resilient Evaluation of Surrounding Rock of In-Service High-Speed Railway Tunnel Based on Information Fusion-Improved Fuzzy Matter-Element," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6048-:d:1112645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis, Royce & Bekera, Behailu, 2014. "A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 90-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    2. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Fauzan Hanif Jufri & Jun-Sung Kim & Jaesung Jung, 2017. "Analysis of Determinants of the Impact and the Grid Capability to Evaluate and Improve Grid Resilience from Extreme Weather Event," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1, November.
    4. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Yang, Bofan & Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Bo & Xiang, Yang & An, Lei & Wang, Wenfeng, 2022. "Complex equipment system resilience: Composition, measurement and element analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Carvallo, Juan Pablo & Frick, Natalie Mims & Schwartz, Lisa, 2022. "A review of examples and opportunities to quantify the grid reliability and resilience impacts of energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Zobel, Christopher W. & Baghersad, Milad, 2020. "Analytically comparing disaster resilience across multiple dimensions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Johansson, Bengt & Jonsson, Daniel K. & Veibäck, Ester & Sonnsjö, Hannes, 2016. "Assessing the capabilites to manage risks in energy systems–analytical perspectives and frameworks with a starting point in Swedish experiences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 429-435.
    9. Mujjuni, F. & Betts, T. & To, L.S. & Blanchard, R.E., 2021. "Resilience a means to development: A resilience assessment framework and a catalogue of indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. H. Klammler & P. S. C. Rao & K. Hatfield, 2018. "Modeling dynamic resilience in coupled technological-social systems subjected to stochastic disturbance regimes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 140-159, March.
    11. Liang Zhao & Gaofeng Xu & Yan Cui & Feng Kong & Huina Gao & Xia Zhou, 2023. "Post-Disaster Restoration and Reconstruction Assessment of the Jiuzhaigou Lake Landscape and a Resilience Development Pathway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Khalilullah Mayar & David G. Carmichael & Xuesong Shen, 2022. "Resilience and Systems—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Ahmadi, Somayeh & Saboohi, Yadollah & Vakili, Ali, 2021. "Frameworks, quantitative indicators, characters, and modeling approaches to analysis of energy system resilience: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2021. "Framework for modeling interdependencies between households, businesses, and infrastructure system, and their response to disruptions—application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Eichhorn Colombo, Konrad W., 2023. "Financial resilience analysis of floating production, storage and offloading plant operated in Norwegian Arctic region: Case study using inter-/transdisciplinary system dynamics modeling and simulatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Younesi, Abdollah & Shayeghi, Hossein & Wang, Zongjie & Siano, Pierluigi & Mehrizi-Sani, Ali & Safari, Amin, 2022. "Trends in modern power systems resilience: State-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Wehrle, Rebecca & Wiens, Marcus & Schultmann, Frank, 2024. "Evaluation of the potential of infrastructure funds: The case of inland waterways in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    19. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Xu, Min, 2019. "Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Yifan Yang & S. Thomas Ng & Frank J. Xu & Martin Skitmore & Shenghua Zhou, 2019. "Towards Resilient Civil Infrastructure Asset Management: An Information Elicitation and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6048-:d:1112645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.