IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6005-d1111883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Territorial Risks and Protection Factors for the Business Continuity of Data Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Gazzola

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Scira Menoni

    (Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Paolo Ghignatti

    (Kyndryl, 20054 Segrate, Italy)

  • Andrea Marini

    (Kyndryl, 20054 Segrate, Italy)

  • Roberto Mauri

    (Kyndryl, 20054 Segrate, Italy)

  • Giovanni Oldani

    (IBM, 20054 Segrate, Italy)

Abstract

The increasing trend towards the global use of Information Technology (IT) is currently determining the need for more and better infrastructures (both physical and digital) for processing, storing and transferring large amounts of data. As Critical Infrastructure (CI) that is potentially exposed and vulnerable to the impact of different types of phenomena (natural, technological, na-tech, etc.), data centers have to guarantee higher levels of security (physical, logical and operational), reliability and efficiency in the provision of services. Starting from a discussion of the main evidence related to this topic, considering both the most recent cases of failure and serious damage to data centers and the evolution of international and European regulation and standards, the authors propose an analytical methodology to assess the territorial risk factors for data centers by a multirisk, multi-dimensional and systemic approach. This proposal leads not only to a more explicit definition of exposure and vulnerable components, but also to the recognition of resources that—in the case of accidental events involving (directly or indirectly) data center infrastructures—may be implemented at different territorial levels as “protection” factors to ensure business continuity by considering the entire resilience cycle, from the prevention phase to the response and recovery phases.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Gazzola & Scira Menoni & Paolo Ghignatti & Andrea Marini & Roberto Mauri & Giovanni Oldani, 2023. "Analysis of Territorial Risks and Protection Factors for the Business Continuity of Data Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6005-:d:1111883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruijun Chen & Yaping Xie & Yingqi Liu, 2021. "Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Multiple Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Scira Menoni & Daniela Molinari & Dennis Parker & Francesco Ballio & Sue Tapsell, 2012. "Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(3), pages 2057-2082, December.
    3. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    4. Luiijf, Eric & Klaver, Marieke, 2021. "Analysis and lessons identified on critical infrastructures and dependencies from an empirical data set," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurul Mohammad Zayed & Friday Ogbu Edeh & Khan Mohammad Anwarul Islam & Vitalii Nitsenko & Olena Polova & Olha Khaietska, 2022. "Utilization of Knowledge Management as Business Resilience Strategy for Microentrepreneurs in Post-COVID-19 Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Danielsson, Erna & Nyhlén, Jon & Olausson, Pär M., 2020. "Strategic planning for power shortages," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    4. Tine Buyl & Thomas Gehrig & Jonas Schreyögg & Andreas Wieland, 2022. "Resilience: A Critical Appraisal of the State of Research for Business and Society," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 453-463, December.
    5. Bo Zou & Pooria Choobchian & Julie Rozenberg, 2021. "Cyber resilience of autonomous mobility systems: cyber-attacks and resilience-enhancing strategies," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 137-155, December.
    6. Sulfikar Amir & Vivek Kant, 2018. "Sociotechnical Resilience: A Preliminary Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 8-16, January.
    7. Mehryar, Sara & Sasson, Idan & Surminski, Swenja, 2022. "Supporting urban adaptation to climate change: what role can resilience measurement tools play?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113367, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Hiba Baroud & Jose E. Ramirez‐Marquez & Kash Barker & Claudio M. Rocco, 2014. "Stochastic Measures of Network Resilience: Applications to Waterway Commodity Flows," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1317-1335, July.
    9. Timothy L. McDaniels & Stephanie E. Chang & David Hawkins & Gerard Chew & Holly Longstaff, 2015. "Towards disaster-resilient cities: an approach for setting priorities in infrastructure mitigation efforts," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 252-263, June.
    10. H. Klammler & P. S. C. Rao & K. Hatfield, 2018. "Modeling dynamic resilience in coupled technological-social systems subjected to stochastic disturbance regimes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 140-159, March.
    11. Mohammed M. Al-Humaiqani & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2023. "Assessing the Built Environment’s Reflectivity, Flexibility, Resourcefulness, and Rapidity Resilience Qualities against Climate Change Impacts from the Perspective of Different Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    12. Chao-Yuan Lin & Yuan-Chung Lai & Shao-Wei Wu & Fan-Chung Mo & Cheng-Yu Lin, 2022. "Assessment of potential sediment disasters and resilience management of mountain roads using environmental indicators," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1951-1975, March.
    13. Dan Yuan & Zhe Song & Jiejie Du & Jing Li, 2024. "Analysis of the Impact of Personal Psychological Knowledge Ownership on Knowledge Sharing Among Employees in Chinese Digital Creative Enterprises: a Moderated Mediating Variable," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3740-3766, March.
    14. Ahmad, Nasir & Derrible, Sybil, 2018. "An information theory based robustness analysis of energy mix in US States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 167-174.
    15. Yingqi Liu & Ruijun Chen & Fei Zhou & Shuang Zhang & Juan Wang, 2021. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Organizational Resilience in the ISM Framework: An Exploratory Study Based on Multiple Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2021. "Framework for modeling interdependencies between households, businesses, and infrastructure system, and their response to disruptions—application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Fang, Yi-Ping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimum post-disruption restoration under uncertainty for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-11.
    18. Elizabeth B. Connelly & Craig R. Allen & Kirk Hatfield & José M. Palma-Oliveira & David D. Woods & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Features of resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 46-50, March.
    19. Hatice Şengül & Dilem Marşan & Tuğçe Gün, 2019. "Survey assessment of organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 470-486, June.
    20. Jesse M. Keenan, 2018. "Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 118-139, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6005-:d:1111883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.