IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5926-d1110481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Analysis of Sustainable Transportation Transitions: Case Study of the University of Saskatchewan Ground Services Fleet

Author

Listed:
  • George Aniegbunem

    (School of Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada)

  • Andrea Kraj

    (School of Environment & Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada)

Abstract

The global transport sector of the world economy contributes about 15% of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in the world today, and this must be drastically curbed. To reduce GHG emissions and achieve carbon neutrality, the University of Saskatchewan’s Office of Sustainability has directed a green energy transition for the institution in recent years, leading diverse sustainability projects and agendas due to the importance of curbing climate change and advancing sustainability. However, there is a strong need to pursue deep decarbonization within the campus, and the university transport system is a critical operational area that the Sustainability Office has considered for decarbonization to achieve the net-zero agenda of the university. The motivation for this work stems from the directive of the Sustainability Office to transform the campus vehicle fleet as an identified area for curbing GHG emissions and meet the University agenda. This study was organized in partnership with the Sustainability Office and involved an economic benefit analysis of the campus fleet (consisting of 91 ICE vehicles) to determine if it was economically or financially feasible to transition from Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs) or PVs (Petrol Vehicles) to Electric Vehicles (EVs). The analysis used RETScreen Expert (a software for analyzing renewable energy technology projects) to model diverse transition scenarios. The variables of Payback Period (PBP), cash flow projections, savings made from transitioning (fuel cost savings and energy cost savings), benefit–cost ratio, and GHG emission reduction potential were analyzed. The findings revealed that the GHG emissions from the campus fleet could be reduced by 100%, resulting in the removal of 298.1 tCO₂ from the environment. The fleet manager could save $CAD 129,049 (88.9%) in fuel costs, and the return on investment could be achieved in year 5 but could be reduced to year 2 if the vehicles were put into constant and active use, eliminating idle times. Lastly, the Sustainability Office would achieve a GHG reduction revenue of CAD 14,906. These findings show that pursuing sustainable transport transitions in the transportation transition for a university campus is financially and economically viable and should be pursued vigorously. The contribution of this work provides examples and evidence to advance policy recommendations to aid the effective and efficient transitioning of the transportation sector, specifically for communities at the scale of university campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • George Aniegbunem & Andrea Kraj, 2023. "Economic Analysis of Sustainable Transportation Transitions: Case Study of the University of Saskatchewan Ground Services Fleet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5926-:d:1110481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khalid Zaman & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Usama Awan & Wiwik Handayani & Hailan Salamun & Abdul Rashid Abdul Aziz & Mohd Khata Jabor & Kamalularifin Subari, 2022. "Transportation-Induced Carbon Emissions Jeopardize Healthcare Logistics Sustainability: Toward a Healthier Today and a Better Tomorrow," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Lowans, Christopher & Foley, Aoife & Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer & Caulfield, Brian & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steven & Rooney, David, 2023. "What causes energy and transport poverty in Ireland? Analysing demographic, economic, and social dynamics, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Li, Xiaomin & Chen, Pu & Wang, Xingwu, 2017. "Impacts of renewables and socioeconomic factors on electric vehicle demands – Panel data studies across 14 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 473-478.
    4. Željko Tomšić & Sara Raos & Ivan Rajšl & Perica Ilak, 2020. "Role of Electric Vehicles in Transition to Low Carbon Power System—Case Study Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. David G. Victor & Ahmed Abdulla & David Auston & Wendell Brase & Jack Brouwer & Karl Brown & Steven J. Davis & Carrie V. Kappel & Alan Meier & Mark Modera & Rebecca Zarin Pass & David Phillips & Jorda, 2018. "Turning Paris into reality at the University of California," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 183-185, March.
    6. Zhao, Congyu & Wang, Kun & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "Is smart transportation associated with reduced carbon emissions? The case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahid Hussain & Bihizi Marcel & Abdul Majeed & Raymondo Sandra Marcelline Tsimisaraka, 2024. "Effects of transport–carbon intensity, transportation, and economic complexity on environmental and health expenditures," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16523-16553, July.
    2. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Xiong, Siqin & Yuan, Yi & Yao, Jia & Bai, Bo & Ma, Xiaoming, 2023. "Exploring consumer preferences for electric vehicles based on the random coefficient logit model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    4. Manu Lahariya & Dries F. Benoit & Chris Develder, 2020. "Synthetic Data Generator for Electric Vehicle Charging Sessions: Modeling and Evaluation Using Real-World Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Hongqi Wang & Jing Huang, 2018. "Exploring Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Zhao, Congyu & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Hong-Dian & Wang, Kun & Dong, Xiucheng, 2023. "How does energy poverty eradication realize the path to carbon unlocking? The case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. Ye, Rui-Ke & Gao, Zhuang-Fei & Fang, Kai & Liu, Kang-Li & Chen, Jia-Wei, 2021. "Moving from subsidy stimulation to endogenous development: A system dynamics analysis of China's NEVs in the post-subsidy era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Phoumin, Han, 2023. "Can financial and economic means accelerate renewable energy growth in the climate change era? The case of China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 730-743.
    9. Huiping Wang & Peiling Liu, 2024. "Characteristics of the urban environmental regulation network and its impact on carbon emission efficiency in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Keran Sarah Boyd & Christian Calvillo & Tanja Mueller & Xiaoyi Mu & Tong Zhu, 2023. "The Intersection of Fuel and Transport Policy in Scotland: A Review of Policy, Definitions and Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent & Inekwe, John Nkwoma & Zakari, Abdulrasheed, 2022. "Transport infrastructure, CO2 emissions, mortality, and life expectancy in the Global South," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 243-253.
    12. Woo-Cheol Jeong & Da-Han Lee & Jae Hyung Roh & Jong-Bae Park, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of the GHG Emissions in the Electricity Sector through 2030 in South Korea Considering Updated NDC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2021. "Do more chargers mean more electric cars?," Ruhr Economic Papers 893, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    14. Tumo Paulus Kele & Mokheseng Makhetha, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of and the Extent to Which Large and Medium Logistics Organisations Report on Social Sustainability—The Case of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Xiaoyuan Feng & Yue Chen & Hongbo Li & Tian Ma & Yilong Ren, 2023. "Gated Recurrent Graph Convolutional Attention Network for Traffic Flow Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Hoarau, Quentin & Perez, Yannick, 2018. "Interactions between electric mobility and photovoltaic generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 510-522.
    17. Jose Esteves & Daniel Alonso-Martínez & Guillermo de Haro, 2021. "Profiling Spanish Prospective Buyers of Electric Vehicles Based on Demographics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Zhao, Congyu & Dong, Kangyin & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2024. "Carbon lock-in endgame: Can energy trilemma eradication contribute to decarbonization?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    19. Khatua, Apalak & Ranjan Kumar, Rajeev & Kumar De, Supriya, 2023. "Institutional enablers of electric vehicle market: Evidence from 30 countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Pius Victor Chombo & Yossapong Laoonual & Somchai Wongwises, 2021. "Lessons from the Electric Vehicle Crashworthiness Leading to Battery Fire," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5926-:d:1110481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.