IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5273-d1098976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passengers’ Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bangkok and Jakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Mahatidanar Hidayat

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Kasem Choocharukul

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

Abstract

Several problems have arisen due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the public transportation sector. Data from 2021 show that the number of bus passengers in Bangkok has decreased by 40–60% below normal conditions, and the number of bus passengers in Jakarta has decreased by around 76% compared to June 2019. In the new normal period, public transport is required to implement strict health protocols in its operations. This paper aims to evaluate potential indicators underlying the intention to use public transport during a pandemic. The target groups are public and paratransit buses in Bangkok and Jakarta, two metropolitan areas in ASEAN that have been greatly affected by this pandemic. A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed in each city. The outcome from the structural equation model reveals a relatively similar finding in both cities. Tangibility is one of the five dimensions of service quality that is influential in both cities; this indicator affects the intention to use public transportation in Jakarta (Coeff. = 14.670, p -value < 0.001) and Bangkok (Coeff. = 1.164, p -value < 0.001). In this study, confidence (CO) is significant for the intention to use public transportation in both cities with a coefficient of 0.105 for Bangkok and 0.969 for Jakarta. Furthermore, the health measure indicator (HM) has a significant value on passenger confidence (CO) in using public transportation for both cities (Coeff. = 0.808, p -value = <0.001 in Bangkok and Coeff. = −1.413, p -value = 0.008 in Jakarta). Health measures such as wearing a mask, always washing hands and not traveling if unwell are considered to be the right policies to prevent the spread of the virus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This practical implication can become a core strategy for improving the quality of public transport services in similar cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Mahatidanar Hidayat & Kasem Choocharukul, 2023. "Passengers’ Intentions to Use Public Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Bangkok and Jakarta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5273-:d:1098976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Hale & Noam Angrist & Rafael Goldszmidt & Beatriz Kira & Anna Petherick & Toby Phillips & Samuel Webster & Emily Cameron-Blake & Laura Hallas & Saptarshi Majumdar & Helen Tatlow, 2021. "A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 529-538, April.
    2. Yuning Wang & Zhe Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu & Hexian Wang, 2020. "The Impact of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Reuse Intention in Urban Rail Transit in Tianjin, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    3. Aaditya, Bh. & Rahul, T.M., 2021. "Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the mode choice behaviour: A hybrid choice modelling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 47-58.
    4. Liou, James J.H. & Hsu, Chao-Che & Chen, Yun-Shen, 2014. "Improving transportation service quality based on information fusion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 225-239.
    5. Muhammad Fadhlullah Abu Bakar & Shuhairy Norhisham & Herda Yati Katman & Chow Ming Fai & Nor Najwa Irina Mohd Azlan & Nur Sarah Shaziah Samsudin, 2022. "Service Quality of Bus Performance in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Chen, Chao & Feng, Tao & Gu, Xiaoning & Yao, Baozhen, 2022. "Investigating the effectiveness of COVID-19 pandemic countermeasures on the use of public transport: A case study of The Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 98-107.
    7. Phasiri Manutworakit & Kasem Choocharukul, 2022. "Factors Influencing Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand—Expanding the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’s Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Ki-Han Song & Solsaem Choi, 2020. "A Study on the Behavioral Change of Passengers on Sustainable Air Transport after COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Farooq, Muhammad Shoaib & Salam, Maimoona & Fayolle, Alain & Jaafar, Norizan & Ayupp, Kartinah, 2018. "Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 169-180.
    10. de Oña, Juan & de Oña, Rocío & Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2013. "Perceived service quality in bus transit service: A structural equation approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 219-226.
    11. Riccardo Ceccato & Riccardo Rossi & Massimiliano Gastaldi, 2021. "Travel Demand Prediction during COVID-19 Pandemic: Educational and Working Trips at the University of Padova," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Guirao, Begoña & García-Pastor, Antonio & López-Lambas, María Eugenia, 2016. "The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 68-77.
    13. William Jen & Kai-Chieh Hu, 2003. "Application of perceived value model to identify factors affecting passengers' repurchase intentions on city bus: A case of the Taipei metropolitan area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 307-327, August.
    14. Varameth Vichiensan & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Sudarat Kamnerdsap, 2021. "COVID-19 Countermeasures and Passengers’ Confidence of Urban Rail Travel in Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Chauhan, Vivek & Gupta, Akshay & Parida, Manoranjan, 2021. "Demystifying service quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH) through measuring users’ satisfaction of public transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 47-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng Dong & Afaq Khattak & Feng Chen & Feifei Xu, 2024. "Stay Two-Meters Apart: Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 Social Distancing Protocols on Subway Station Walkway Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Karimi, Sina & Samadzad, Mahdi & Lesteven, Gaele, 2024. "Navigating public transport during a pandemic: Key lessons on travel behavior and social equity from two surveys in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuenyindee, Thanatorn & Ong, Ardvin Kester S. & Ramos, Jon Pauline & Prasetyo, Yogi Tri & Nadlifatin, Reny & Kurata, Yoshiki B. & Sittiwatethanasiri, Thaninrat, 2022. "Public utility vehicle service quality and customer satisfaction in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Yung-Tsan Jou & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Klint Allen Mariñas & Michael Nayat Young, 2023. "Determining Factors Affecting Perceived Customer Satisfaction on Public Utility Bus System in Occidental Mindoro, Philippines: A Case Study on Service Quality Assessment during Major Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Varameth Vichiensan & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Sudarat Kamnerdsap, 2021. "COVID-19 Countermeasures and Passengers’ Confidence of Urban Rail Travel in Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Hongjun Cui & Mingzhi Li & Minqing Zhu & Xinwei Ma, 2023. "Investigating the Impacts of Urban–Rural Bus Service Quality on Rural Residents’ Travel Choices Using an SEM–MNL Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Aghajanzadeh, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2022. "Has COVID-19 changed our loyalty towards public transport? Understanding the moderating role of the pandemic in the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 80-103.
    6. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-57.
    7. Heejoon Kim & Woon-Kyung Song & Jin-Woo Park, 2022. "The Effect of COVID-19 Countermeasures on Korean Air Passenger Confidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Carolina Silva Costa & Cira Souza Pitombo & Felipe Lobo Umbelino de Souza, 2022. "Travel Behavior before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil: Mobility Changes and Transport Policies for a Sustainable Transportation System in the Post-Pandemic Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Agnieszka Gaschi-Uciecha, 2023. "The Problem of Reliability in Public Transport for the Metropolis GMZ Area-Pilots Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Rosell, Jordi, 2019. "Effect of a major network reform on bus transit satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 310-333.
    11. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    12. Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj & Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs, 2016. "Measurement modelling of the perceived service quality of a sightseeing bus service: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 240-252.
    13. Kumar, Akshay & Gupta, Akshay & Parida, Manoranjan & Chauhan, Vivek, 2022. "Service quality assessment of ride-sourcing services: A distinction between ride-hailing and ride-sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-79.
    14. Echaniz, Eneko & Ho, Chinh Q. & Rodriguez, Andres & dell'Olio, Luigi, 2019. "Comparing best-worst and ordered logit approaches for user satisfaction in transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 752-769.
    15. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    16. Samanci, Simge & Didem Atalay, Kumru & Bahar Isin, Feride, 2021. "Focusing on the big picture while observing the concerns of both managers and passengers in the post-covid era," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Mandhani, Jyoti & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar & Parida, Manoranjan, 2020. "Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 320-336.
    18. Ganji, S.S. & Ahangar, A.N. & Awasthi, Anjali & Jamshidi Bandari, Smaneh, 2021. "Psychological analysis of intercity bus passenger satisfaction using Q methodology," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 345-363.
    19. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2022. "Applications of discrete choice experiments in COVID-19 research: Disparity in survey qualities between health and transport fields," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    20. Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Onanong Sangphong & Buratin Khampirat & Siradol Siridhara & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2016. "Public transport promotion policy on campus: evidence from Suranaree University in Thailand," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 185-203, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5273-:d:1098976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.