IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5246-d1098530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Pricing Strategy of New Products and Remanufactured Products Considering Consumers’ Switching Purchase Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    Western China Transportation-Economy-Society Development Study Center, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Qing Xiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Ting Peng

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

Due to income constraints, increased awareness of environmental protection and preference for new products, consumers generate switching purchases between new and remanufactured products, which often lead to a “cannibalization effect” in the market, and make sellers fall into a vicious circle of price reduction. Considering consumers’ switching purchase behavior, this study examines the pricing problem of new products and remanufactured products in the competitive market environment. Based on two-period duopoly asymmetric price game models, there has been less research on the effectiveness of the price matching strategy and the traditional dynamic pricing strategy, which is the issue that this paper is dedicated to discussing. This study analyzes the equilibrium profits and their influencing factors under the dynamic pricing and price matching strategies of sellers, and discusses the simplified solution of the model. The results show that consumer learning costs, initial consumers and product differences can affect the sellers’ pricing decisions. Consumers’ learning costs of products reduces the equilibrium profit of the manufacturer and increases that of the remanufacturer. Initial consumers are not always advantageous for sellers’ profitability. Product differences affect the determination of the seller’s equilibrium strategy. In the optimal strategy, the remanufacturer should insist on price matching, while the manufacturer should choose dynamic pricing or price matching according to the product differences. This study provides sellers with insights to choose appropriate and custom pricing strategies to maximize profit as well as prevent the majority of consumers switching purchase.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Li & Qing Xiao & Ting Peng, 2023. "Optimal Pricing Strategy of New Products and Remanufactured Products Considering Consumers’ Switching Purchase Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5246-:d:1098530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niu, Baozhuang & Bao, Jinxiao & Cao, Bin, 2022. "Retailer's make-or-buy decision for remanufactured products under in-house yield uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Sivakumar, K. & Weigand, Robert E., 1997. "Model of retail price match guarantees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 241-255, July.
    3. Nenggui Zhao & Qiang Wang & Ping Cao & Jie Wu, 2019. "Dynamic pricing with reference price effect and price-matching policy in the presence of strategic consumers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(12), pages 2069-2083, December.
    4. Yuxin Chen & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2001. "Consumer Heterogeneity and Competitive Price-Matching Guarantees," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 300-314, June.
    5. Hao Li & Xi Yang & Yu Tu & Ting Peng, 2019. "Two-Period Dynamic versus Fixed-Ratio Pricing Policies under Duopoly Competition," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, March.
    6. Jiwoong Shin, 2007. "How Does Free Riding on Customer Service Affect Competition?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 488-503, 07-08.
    7. Amit Mehra & Subodha Kumar & Jagmohan S. Raju, 2018. "Competitive Strategies for Brick-and-Mortar Stores to Counter “Showrooming”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3076-3090, July.
    8. Wen, Danping & Xiao, Tiaojun & Dastani, Mehdi, 2021. "Channel choice for an independent remanufacturer considering environmentally responsible consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    9. Prasad, Ashutosh & Venkatesh, R. & Mahajan, Vijay, 2015. "Product bundling or reserved product pricing? Price discrimination with myopic and strategic consumers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-8.
    10. Xing, Dahai & Liu, Tieming, 2012. "Sales effort free riding and coordination with price match and channel rebate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 264-271.
    11. Dasu, Sriram & Tong, Chunyang, 2010. "Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 662-671, August.
    12. Janssen, Maarten C.W. & Parakhonyak, Alexei, 2013. "Price matching guarantees and consumer search," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-11.
    13. Morten Hviid & Greg Shaffer, 1999. "Hassle Costs: The Achilles' Heel of Price‐Matching Guarantees," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), pages 489-521, December.
    14. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Chew, Ek Peng & Lee, Chulung & Liu, Rujing & Hong, Ki-sung & Zhang, Anming, 2014. "Optimal dynamic pricing and ordering decisions for perishable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 39-48.
    16. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. David Besanko & Wayne L. Winston, 1990. "Optimal Price Skimming by a Monopolist Facing Rational Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 555-567, May.
    18. Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2019. "When should the offline retailer implement price matching?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 996-1009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Zhou & Yue Qi & Xinshang You, 2023. "Research on Time to Market and Pricing of Platform Products in a Competitive Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trost, Michael, 2022. "Unraveling the spreading pattern of collusively effective competition clauses," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 01-2022, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    2. Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2019. "When should the offline retailer implement price matching?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 996-1009.
    3. Huang, Lingchen & Liu, Bin & Zhang, Rong, 2024. "Channel strategies for competing retailers: Whether and when to introduce live stream?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 413-426.
    4. Pun, Hubert & Chen, Jing & Li, Wei, 2020. "Channel strategy for manufacturers in the presence of service freeriders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 460-479.
    5. Wei, Jie & Chang, Meijing, 2023. "Are price matching and logistics service enhancement always effective strategies for improving profitability?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 103-115.
    6. Zhong, Yuyun & Shen, Wenjing & Ceryan, Oben, 2023. "Information provision under showrooming and webrooming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Amit Mehra & Subodha Kumar & Jagmohan S. Raju, 2018. "Competitive Strategies for Brick-and-Mortar Stores to Counter “Showrooming”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3076-3090, July.
    8. Subrata Mitra, 2022. "Economic models of price competition between traditional and online retailing under showrooming," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(1), pages 29-63, March.
    9. Gisches, Eyran J. & Qi, Hang & Becker, William J. & Rapoport, Amnon, 2021. "Strategic retailers and myopic consumers: Competitive pricing of perishable goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Hou, Lihua & Nie, Tengfei & Zhang, Jianghua, 2024. "Pricing and inventory strategies for perishable products in a competitive market considering strategic consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Pavel Kireyev & Vineet Kumar & Elie Ofek, 2017. "Match Your Own Price? Self-Matching as a Retailer’s Multichannel Pricing Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 908-930, November.
    12. Li, Yanran & Li, Bo & Zheng, Wei & Chen, Xue, 2021. "Reveal or hide? Impact of demonstration on pricing decisions considering showrooming behavior," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Taiguang Gao & Kui Wang & Yali Mei & Shan He & Yanfang Wang, 2022. "Supply Chain Pricing Models Considering Risk Attitudes under Free-Riding Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Trost, Michael, 2021. "The collusive efficacy of competition clauses in Bertrand Markets with capacity-constrained retailers," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 04-2021, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    15. Zhang, Guangxia & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Xianpei, 2022. "Free rider effect of quality information disclosure in remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Samir Mamadehussene, 2021. "Measuring the competition effects of price-matching guarantees," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 261-287, December.
    17. Tian, Chen & Xiao, Tiaojun & Shang, Jennifer, 2022. "Channel differentiation strategy in a dual-channel supply chain considering free riding behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 473-485.
    18. Liberali, Guilherme & Gruca, Thomas S. & Nique, Walter M., 2011. "The effects of sensitization and habituation in durable goods markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 398-410, July.
    19. Morten Hviid & Greg Shaffer, 2012. "Optimal low-price guarantees with anchoring," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 393-417, December.
    20. Pinar Akman & Morten Hviid, 2005. "A Most-Favoured-Customer Guarantee with a Twist," Working Papers 05-8, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5246-:d:1098530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.