IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4879-d1092320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Quality and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sidan Li

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Shibing You

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Duochenxi Liu

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Yukun Wang

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Based on panel data of Chinese provinces from 2011 to 2020, this paper presents empirical research on the quantitative relationship between China’s national quality and sustainable development. Moreover, this research is implemented under the index system of national quality competitiveness. Firstly, a system for assessing national quality level is established, and the factor analysis method is applied to comprehensively analyze each province’s national quality; this produces a national quality score for each province. Secondly, an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) and calculation methods are created. Thirdly, the Pearson Correlation Coefficient is employed to explore the relationship between the national quality of Chinese provinces and the sustainability of their economic development. Finally, the test of Granger causality (panel data) is applied to further analyze the interplay between national quality indexes and sustainable economic development. As the research results indicate, national quality can comprehensively impact sustainable economic development at any economic level, as well as its sustainable capability. National quality can still comprehensively affect the sustainable development of the economy. Nevertheless, sustainable economic growth does not affect all elements of national quality, especially at the level of morality. Additionally, the positive influence of sustainable economic development on national quality is limited and lags behind. Based on the results of our empirical analysis, several policy recommendations are given to improve China’s national quality and sustainable economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidan Li & Shibing You & Duochenxi Liu & Yukun Wang, 2023. "National Quality and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4879-:d:1092320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4879/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4879/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Zheng & Hao, Rui, 2010. "Demographic structure and economic growth: Evidence from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 472-491, December.
    2. Nancy Devlin & Paul Hansen, 2001. "Health care spending and economic output: Granger causality," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(8), pages 561-564.
    3. Sayema Haque Bidisha & S M Abdullah & Salina Siddiqua & Mohammad Mainul Islam, 2020. "How Does Dependency Ratio Affect Economic Growth In the Long Run? Evidence from Selected Asian Countries," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 54(2), pages 47-60, April-Jul.
    4. Xincheng Zhu & Yulin Liu & Xin Fang, 2022. "Revisiting the Sustainable Economic Welfare Growth in China: Provincial Assessment Based on the ISEW," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 279-306, July.
    5. Brent Bleys, 2013. "The Regional Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Flanders, Belgium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Kazuyuki Iwata, 2010. "The relationship between traffic accidents and economic growth in China," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(4), pages 3306-3314.
    7. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    8. Yang, Xinyu & Jiang, Ping & Pan, Yao, 2020. "Does China's carbon emission trading policy have an employment double dividend and a Porter effect?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. O'Mahony, Tadhg & Escardó-Serra, Paula & Dufour, Javier, 2018. "Revisiting ISEW Valuation Approaches: The Case of Spain Including the Costs of Energy Depletion and of Climate Change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 292-303.
    10. Murat Belke & Süleyman Bolat, 2016. "The Panel Data Analysis of Female Labor Participation and Economic Development Relationship in Developed and Developing Countries," Economic Research Guardian, Mutascu Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 67-73, December.
    11. Easterlin, Richard A., 1995. "Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 35-47, June.
    12. LI, Hongyi & HUANG, Liang, 2009. "Health, education, and economic growth in China: Empirical findings and implications," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 374-387, September.
    13. Gylfason, Thorvaldur, 2001. "Natural resources, education, and economic development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4-6), pages 847-859, May.
    14. Pulselli, Federico Maria & Ciampalini, Francesca & Tiezzi, Enzo & Zappia, Carlo, 2006. "The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for a local authority: A case study in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 271-281, November.
    15. Besime Fekri Ziberi & Donat Rexha & Xhemazie Ibraimi & Besnik Avdiaj, 2022. "Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Education on Economic Growth," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Clarke, Matthew & Islam, Sardar M.N., 2005. "Diminishing and negative welfare returns of economic growth: an index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 81-93, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lihui Li & Huimin Wang, 2023. "Influence of Green Investment on China’s Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Ke Wang & Venus Khim-Sen Liew, 2024. "The Impact of Vertical Fiscal Imbalances and Local Government Tax Efforts on the Quality of Economic Development—A Study Based on Threshold Regression and Simultaneous Equation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luhua Wu & Shijie Wang & Xiaoyong Bai & Guangjie Luo & Jinfeng Wang & Fei Chen & Chaojun Li & Chen Ran & Sirui Zhang, 2022. "Accelerating the Improvement of Human Well-Being in China through Economic Growth and Policy Adjustment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Daniel Francisco Pais & Tiago Lopes Afonso & Ant nio Cardoso Marques & Jos A Fuinhas, 2019. "Are Economic Growth and Sustainable Development Converging? Evidence from the Comparable Genuine Progress Indicator for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 202-213.
    3. Yulin Liu & Xincheng Zhu & Yuhao Wang, 2023. "Revisiting and evaluation of the index of sustainable economic welfare based on artificial intelligence: data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2019," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3123-3152, April.
    4. Long, Xianling & Ji, Xi, 2019. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-176.
    5. Xincheng Zhu & Yulin Liu & Xin Fang, 2022. "Revisiting the Sustainable Economic Welfare Growth in China: Provincial Assessment Based on the ISEW," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 279-306, July.
    6. Bleys, Brent & Whitby, Alistair, 2015. "Barriers and opportunities for alternative measures of economic welfare," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 162-172.
    7. Günseli BERIK, 2020. "Measuring what matters and guiding policy: An evaluation of the Genuine Progress Indicator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 71-94, March.
    8. Hayashi, Takashi, 2015. "Measuring rural–urban disparity with the Genuine Progress Indicator: A case study in Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 260-271.
    9. Pulselli, Federico M. & Bravi, Mirko & Tiezzi, Enzo, 2012. "Application and use of the ISEW for assessing the sustainability of a regional system: A case study in Italy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 766-778.
    10. Narayan Sethi & Saileja Mohanty & Aurolipsa Das & Malayaranjan Sahoo, 2024. "Health Expenditure and Economic Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence from South Asian Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2_suppl), pages 229-243, April.
    11. Mirko Armiento, 2016. "The Sustainable Welfare Index for Italy, 1960-2013," Working Papers 1601, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2016.
    12. Ji, Xi & Wu, Guowei & Su, Pinyi & Luo, Xuanyuan & Long, Xianling, 2022. "Does legislation improvement alleviate the decoupling between welfare and wealth in China?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Ayhan Kuloglu & Ebru Topcu, 2016. "The Relationship Between Health And Growth In Eurasian Economic Union," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(4), pages 42-48.
    14. Jonas Van der Slycken & Brent Bleys, 2021. "Towards ISEW and GPI 2.0, part II: Is Europe faring well with growth? Evidence from a welfare comparison in the EU-15 from 1995 to 2018," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 21/1027, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    15. Van der Slycken, Jonas & Bleys, Brent, 2020. "A Conceptual Exploration and Critical Inquiry into the Theoretical Foundation(s) of Economic Welfare Measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Dorothee Rodenhäuser & Benjamin Held & Hans Diefenbacher, 2019. "Der Nationale Wohlfahrtsindex," IMK Studies 64-2019, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    17. Posner, Stephen M. & Costanza, Robert, 2011. "A summary of ISEW and GPI studies at multiple scales and new estimates for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and the State of Maryland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1972-1980, September.
    18. Nadide Halıcı-Tülüce & İbrahim Doğan & Cüneyt Dumrul, 2016. "Is income relevant for health expenditure and economic growth nexus?," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 23-49, March.
    19. Rugani, Benedetto & Marvuglia, Antonino & Pulselli, Federico Maria, 2018. "Predicting Sustainable Economic Welfare – Analysis and perspectives for Luxembourg based on energy policy scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 288-303.
    20. Van der Slycken, Jonas & Bleys, Brent, 2024. "Is Europe faring well with growth? Evidence from a welfare comparison in the EU-15 (1995–2018)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4879-:d:1092320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.