IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4723-d1090015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Financing Efficiency of China’s Industrial Listed Enterprises Based on the Dynamic–Network SBM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xianhua Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao 334001, China)

  • Danting Zheng

    (School of Economics and Management, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao 334001, China)

  • Yuanyuan Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao 334001, China)

  • Sanggyun Na

    (School of Business Administration, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Industry is an important force in China’s economic development; however, with the transformation and upgrading of the industrial structure, a large number of resources have flowed to the tertiary industry, and the funding problem has become one of the main disadvantages restricting China’s industrial enterprises’ sustainable development. This paper aims to point out the problems and improvement directions of financing efficiency of China’s industrial listed enterprises. Based on the two-stage dynamic network SBM (DNSBM) model, this paper evaluates the financing efficiency of 450 of China’s industrial listed enterprises from 2011 to 2017. The results show that: (1) the overall financing efficiency of China’s industrial listed enterprises is low, the funds are not used effectively, and there is great room for improvement; (2) the overall financing efficiency of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is lower than that of non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs), the average fund raising efficiency of SOEs is greater than the fund using efficiency, but the opposite is true for NSOEs; (3) the overall financing efficiency of the main-board-listed enterprises is the lowest, and that of the growth enterprise market (GEM) is the highest, the most obvious gap is in the second stage of fund using, but this gap is gradually narrowing; and (4) the overall financing efficiency of China’s industrial enterprises has obvious regional characteristics, the fund raising efficiency value in each region is not much different, while the fund using is significantly different. To improve financing efficiency, enterprises must improve their financing channels, choose the best financing method, maintain a reasonable debt-financing ratio, improve management level and profitability, increase enterprise value, enhance the debt-paying ability, and attract more capital at a low cost. In addition, the government should also provide corresponding financing support policies for different types of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianhua Tan & Danting Zheng & Yuanyuan Zhu & Sanggyun Na, 2023. "The Financing Efficiency of China’s Industrial Listed Enterprises Based on the Dynamic–Network SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4723-:d:1090015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna, 1996. "Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 65-70, January.
    2. repec:bla:jfinan:v:43:y:1988:i:3:p:567-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gheeraert, Laurent & Weill, Laurent, 2015. "Does Islamic banking development favor macroeconomic efficiency? Evidence on the Islamic finance-growth nexus," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-39.
    4. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2005. "Returns to scale in dynamic DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 536-544, March.
    5. Forrester, Sydney P. & Reames, Tony G., 2020. "Understanding the residential energy efficiency financing coverage gap and market potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. He, Ying & Chen, Cindy & Hu, Yue, 2019. "Managerial overconfidence, internal financing, and investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 501-510.
    7. Ma, Hoi-Lam & Wang, Z.X. & Chan, Felix T.S., 2020. "How important are supply chain collaborative factors in supply chain finance? A view of financial service providers in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 341-346.
    8. Jin, Yi & Gao, Xiaoyan & Wang, Min, 2021. "The financing efficiency of listed energy conservation and environmental protection firms: Evidence and implications for green finance in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Xun Liu & Xiaoliang Yu & Simon Gao, 2019. "A quantitative study of financing efficiency of low‐carbon companies: A three‐stage data envelopment analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 858-871, July.
    10. Demirguc-Kunt, Ash & Levine, Ross, 1996. "Stock Markets, Corporate Finance, and Economic Growth: An Overview," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 10(2), pages 223-239, May.
    11. Stulz, ReneM., 1990. "Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 3-27, July.
    12. Jayaraman, Sudarshan, 2012. "The effect of enforcement on timely loss recognition: Evidence from insider trading laws," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 77-97.
    13. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    14. Xianhua Tan & Sanggyun Na & Lei Guo & Jing Chen & Zhihua Ruan, 2019. "External Financing Efficiency of Rural Revitalization Listed Companies in China—Based on Two-Stage DEA and Grey Relational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    16. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2008. "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 418-429, February.
    17. Kaoru Tone & Miki Tsutsui, 2014. "Slacks-Based Network DEA," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 231-259, Springer.
    18. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 145-156, June.
    19. Karthik Balakrishnan & John E. Core & Rodrigo S. Verdi, 2014. "The Relation Between Reporting Quality and Financing and Investment: Evidence from Changes in Financing Capacity," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 1-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.
    3. Zhen Shi & Yingju Wu & Yung-ho Chiu & Fengping Wu & Changfeng Shi, 2020. "Dynamic Linkages among Mining Production and Land Rehabilitation Efficiency in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Chiu, Yung-ho & Huang, Kuei-Ying & Chang, Tzu-Han & Lin, Tai-Yu, 2021. "Efficiency assessment of coal mine use and land restoration: Considering climate change and income differences," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Xianhua Tan & Sanggyun Na & Lei Guo & Jing Chen & Zhihua Ruan, 2019. "External Financing Efficiency of Rural Revitalization Listed Companies in China—Based on Two-Stage DEA and Grey Relational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Bai, Xue-Jie & Yan, Wen-Kai & Chiu, Yung-Ho, 2015. "Performance evaluation of China's Hi-tech zones in the post financial crisis era — Analysis based on the dynamic network SBM model," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 122-134.
    7. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    8. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena, 2019. "Accounting for slacks to measure dynamic inefficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 463-471.
    9. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    10. Wanke, Peter & Tsionas, Mike G. & Chen, Zhongfei & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio, 2020. "Dynamic network DEA and SFA models for accounting and financial indicators with an analysis of super-efficiency in stochastic frontiers: An efficiency comparison in OECD banking," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 456-468.
    11. Chen, Ya & Li, Yongjun & Liang, Liang & Salo, Ahti & Wu, Huaqing, 2016. "Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 543-554.
    12. Suvvari Anandarao & S. Raja Sethu Durai & Phanindra Goyari, 2019. "Efficiency Decomposition in two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An application to Life Insurance companies in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 271-285, June.
    13. Xiong, Xi & Yang, Guo-liang & Guan, Zhong-cheng, 2018. "Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 784-805.
    14. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    15. Mergoni, Anna & Soncin, Mara & Agasisti, Tommaso, 2023. "The effect of ICT on schools’ efficiency: Empirical evidence on 23 European countries," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Duygun, Meryem & Prior, Diego & Shaban, Mohamed & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2016. "Disentangling the European airlines efficiency puzzle: A network data envelopment analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 2-14.
    17. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    18. Lim, Dong-Joon & Kim, Moon-Su, 2022. "Measuring dynamic efficiency with variable time lag effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Chen, Zhongfei & Wanke, Peter & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Zhang, Ning, 2017. "Chinese airline efficiency under CO2 emissions and flight delays: A stochastic network DEA model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-108.
    20. Kelly D.T.Trinh & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2015. "Bootstrap-based testing for network DEA: Some Theory and Applications," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052015, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4723-:d:1090015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.