IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4614-d1087965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Route Choice Model for the Investigation of Drivers’ Willingness to Choose a Flyover Motorway in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Politis

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios Georgiadis

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Aristomenis Kopsacheilis

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Anastasia Nikolaidou

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Chrysanthi Sfyri

    (Transport Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Socrates Basbas

    (Department of Transportation & Hydraulic Engineering, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The constant evolution of many urban areas ultimately reaches a point where the current infrastructure cannot further serve the needs of citizens. In the case of transport networks, congested roads, increased delay, and low level of service are among the indicators of a need for road infrastructure upgrade. Thessaloniki is the second-largest city in Greece with a population of over 1 million inhabitants in its metropolitan area. Currently, a significant share of the city’s traffic demand is served via its ring road, whose capacity is set to be enhanced through the construction of a flyover highway with the simultaneous upgrade of the existing ring road. The current study aims at investigating the key factors determining the final route choice of drivers between the two road axes. To that end, data from a combined revealed and stated preference survey targeting car drivers were collected, which were later exploited as the basis for the development of binary route choice regression and machine learning models. The results reveal that drivers’ choice is affected by criteria such as total travel time, the probability of accident occurrence, and closure time due to accident. The results of this paper could prove beneficial to transport researchers in forecasting drivers’ behavior in terms of route choice and to practitioners during the planning phase of similar infrastructure projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Politis & Georgios Georgiadis & Aristomenis Kopsacheilis & Anastasia Nikolaidou & Chrysanthi Sfyri & Socrates Basbas, 2023. "A Route Choice Model for the Investigation of Drivers’ Willingness to Choose a Flyover Motorway in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4614-:d:1087965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders F. Jensen & Thomas K. Rasmussen & Carlo G. Prato, 2020. "A Route Choice Model for Capturing Driver Preferences When Driving Electric and Conventional Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Jou, Rong-Chang & Lam, Soi-Hoi & Liu, Yu-Hsin & Chen, Ke-Hong, 2005. "Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 445-461, June.
    3. Shenhao Wang & Baichuan Mo & Stephane Hess & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Comparing hundreds of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models in predicting travel behavior: an empirical benchmark," Papers 2102.01130, arXiv.org.
    4. Ben-Elia, Eran & Shiftan, Yoram, 2010. "Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 249-264, May.
    5. Zhao, Wenjing & Ma, Zhuanglin & Yang, Kui & Huang, Helai & Monsuur, Fredrik & Lee, Jaeyoung, 2020. "Impacts of variable message signs on en-route route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 335-349.
    6. Junwei Zeng & Yongsheng Qian & Bingbing Wang & Tingjuan Wang & Xuting Wei, 2019. "The Impact of Traffic Crashes on Urban Network Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Srinivasan, Karthik K. & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2003. "Analyzing heterogeneity and unobserved structural effects in route-switching behavior under ATIS: a dynamic kernel logit formulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 793-814, November.
    8. Siti Raudhatul Fadilah & Hiroaki Nishiuchi & An Minh Ngoc, 2022. "The Impact of Traffic Information Provision and Prevailing Policy on the Route Choice Behavior of Motorcycles Based on the Stated Preference Experiment: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siti Raudhatul Fadilah & Hiroaki Nishiuchi & An Minh Ngoc, 2022. "The Impact of Traffic Information Provision and Prevailing Policy on the Route Choice Behavior of Motorcycles Based on the Stated Preference Experiment: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Jou, Rong-Chang & Chen, Ke-Hong, 2013. "An application of cumulative prospect theory to freeway drivers’ route choice behaviours," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 123-131.
    3. Rong-Chang Jou . & Ke-Hong Chen, 2015. "How Much Will I Pay for Freeway Real-Time Traffic Information?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Eran Ben-Elia & Robert Ishaq & Yoram Shiftan, 2013. "“If only I had taken the other road...”: Regret, risk and reinforced learning in informed route-choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 269-293, February.
    5. de Moraes Ramos, Giselle & Daamen, Winnie & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2013. "Modelling travellers' heterogeneous route choice behaviour as prospect maximizers," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 17-33.
    6. Joh, Chang-Hyeon & Lee, Backjin & Bin, Miyoung & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2011. "Exploring the use of travel information – identifying contextual market segmentation in Seoul, Korea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1245-1251.
    7. Hongcheng Gan & Xin Ye, 2013. "Investigation of drivers' diversion responses to urban freeway variable message signs displaying freeway and local street travel times," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 651-668, December.
    8. Alessandro Vacca & Carlo Giacomo Prato & Italo Meloni, 2019. "Should I stay or should I go? Investigating route switching behavior from revealed preferences data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 75-93, February.
    9. Ben-Elia, Eran & Ettema, Dick, 2011. "Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters' travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 567-582, August.
    10. Jinhyun Hong & David Philip McArthur & Mark Livingston, 2019. "Can Accessing the Internet while Travelling Encourage Commuters to Use Public Transport Regardless of Their Attitude?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    11. Zhang, Rong & Verhoef, Erik T., 2006. "A monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems and road use efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 424-443, June.
    12. Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Towards decolonial human subjects in research on transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Liu, Yu-Hsin, 2011. "Incorporating scatter search and threshold accepting in finding maximum likelihood estimates for the multinomial probit model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 130-138, May.
    14. Rong-Chang Jou & David A. Hensher & Yu-Hsin Liu & Ching-Shu Chiu, 2010. "Urban Commuters’ Mode-switching Behaviour in Taipai, with an Application of the Bounded Rationality Principle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(3), pages 650-665, March.
    15. Guevara, C. Angelo & Tang, Yue & Gao, Song, 2018. "The initial condition problem with complete history dependency in learning models for travel choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 850-861.
    16. Soriguera, Francesc, 2014. "On the value of highway travel time information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 294-310.
    17. Thierry Blayac & Maïté Stéphan, 2022. "Travel information provision and commuter behavior changes: Evidence from a french metropolis," Post-Print hal-03649092, HAL.
    18. Wang, Qing & Zhao, Wenjing & Ma, Shoufeng & Schonfeld, Paul M. & Zheng, Yue & Xue, Dabin, 2023. "Effects of a price incentive policy on urban rail transit passengers: A case study in Nanjing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Casper G. Chorus & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2011. "Personal Intelligent Travel Assistants," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 25, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Hongbo Ye & Hai Yang, 2017. "Rational Behavior Adjustment Process with Boundedly Rational User Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 968-980, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4614-:d:1087965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.