IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4380-d1084487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Evaluation of Human Settlements Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Feifei Wu

    (Key Laboratory of Radiation Environment & Health of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Xiaohua Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Bing Lian

    (Key Laboratory of Radiation Environment & Health of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Yan Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Radiation Environment & Health of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Jing Kang

    (Key Laboratory of Radiation Environment & Health of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

The suitability evaluation of human settlements over time and space is essential to track potential challenges towards suitable human settlements and provide references for policy-makers. This study established a theoretical framework of human settlements based on the nature, human, economy, society, and residence subsystems. Evaluation indicators were determined with the consideration of the coupling effect among subsystems. Based on the extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test algorithm, the global sensitivity analysis was used to determine the weights of indicators. The human settlement suitability was evaluated in 30 provinces of China between 2000 and 2016. The findings were as follows: (1) human settlement suitability index (HSSI) values increased significantly in all 30 provinces from 2000 to 2016. The suitability index of the residence subsystem in China exhibited the fastest growth, followed by the society and economy subsystems. (2) HSSI in eastern provinces with a developed economy was higher than that in western provinces with an underdeveloped economy. In contrast, the growth rate of HSSI in eastern provinces was significantly higher than that in western provinces. (3) The inter-provincial difference in HSSI narrowed down from 2000 to 2016. For subsystems, the difference narrowed down for the residence system, whereas it widened for the economy system. (4) The suitability of the nature subsystem has become a limiting factor for the improvement of human settlement suitability, especially in economically developed provinces, such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong. The results can be helpful to support decision-making and policy for improving the quality of human settlements in a broad nature, human, economy, society, and residence context.

Suggested Citation

  • Feifei Wu & Xiaohua Yang & Bing Lian & Yan Wang & Jing Kang, 2023. "Suitability Evaluation of Human Settlements Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4380-:d:1084487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan Xu & Guoquan Zheng & Qianda Zhuang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Divergence of Rural Human Settlement Quality of Mountainous Counties in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Mark Elder & Magnus Bengtsson & Lewis Akenji, 2016. "An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Wenfei Luan & Ling Lu & Xin Li & Chunfeng Ma, 2017. "Weight Determination of Sustainable Development Indicators Using a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingqing Yang & Yanhui Gao & Xiaoshu Cao & Jie Yang, 2023. "Contributions and Resistances to Vulnerability of Rural Human Settlements System in Agricultural Areas of Chinese Loess Plateau since 1980," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Wenqing Fu & Renfeng Ma & Xianjun Liang & Yiran Zhao & Lingzhi Wu & Maoyu Luo & Yanjun Mao, 2023. "Perception Analysis of the Transformation from a Fishery-Led to Industry-Led Island with its Human Settlement Changes: A Case Study of Liuheng Island, Zhoushan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Huirong Chen & Jianzhong Yang & Jinliang Wang, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Vulnerability Assessment of the Human Settlements along the Beibu Gulf Coast of Guangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Rositsa T. Ilieva, 2017. "Urban Food Systems Strategies: A Promising Tool for Implementing the SDGs in Practice †," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-35, September.
    3. Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed & Afzal Shah, 2021. "The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2931-2948, March.
    4. Myriam Pham‐Truffert & Florence Metz & Manuel Fischer & Henri Rueff & Peter Messerli, 2020. "Interactions among Sustainable Development Goals: Knowledge for identifying multipliers and virtuous cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1236-1250, September.
    5. Nicolás Gambetta & Paula Azadian & Victoria Hourcade & María Elisa Reyes, 2019. "The Financing Framework for Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies: The Case of Uruguay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Filip Kokotovic & Petar Kurecic & Trina Mjeda, 2019. "Accomplishing the Sustainable Development Goal 13 - Climate Action and the Role of the European Union," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(1-B), pages 132-145.
    7. Annemarie Körfgen & Klaus Förster & Ingomar Glatz & Stephan Maier & Benedikt Becsi & Anna Meyer & Helga Kromp-Kolb & Johann Stötter, 2018. "It’s a Hit! Mapping Austrian Research Contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. M. Niaz Asadullah & Antonio Savoia & Kunal Sen, 2020. "Will South Asia Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030? Learning from the MDGs Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 165-189, November.
    9. Yingchun Ge & Xin Li & Ximing Cai & Xiangzheng Deng & Feng Wu & Zhongyuan Li & Wenfei Luan, 2018. "Converting UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Decision-Making Objectives and Implementation Options at the River Basin Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Ayodele Asekomeh & Obindah Gershon & Smith I. Azubuike, 2021. "Optimally Clocking the Low Carbon Energy Mile to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Dundee’s Electric Vehicle Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Karen Setty & Alejandro Jiménez & Juliet Willetts & Mats Leifels & Jamie Bartram, 2020. "Global water, sanitation and hygiene research priorities and learning challenges under Sustainable Development Goal 6," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(1), pages 64-84, January.
    12. Friederike Landau & Alexandra Toland, 2022. "Towards a sensory politics of the Anthropocene: Exploring activist-artistic approaches to politicizing air pollution," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(3), pages 629-647, May.
    13. Justyna Maliszewska-Nienartowicz, 2020. "Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities as an Important Element of Economic and Social Development: The European Union Case," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1084-1099.
    14. Mahn, Timo C., 2017. "Accountability for development cooperation under the 2030 Agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Minxun Ma & Nannan Wang & Wenjian Mu & Lin Zhang, 2022. "The Instrumentality of Public-Private Partnerships for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Mark Elder & Gemma Ellis, 2023. "ASEAN countries’ environmental policies for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10975-10993, October.
    17. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    18. Oana Forestier & Rakhyun E. Kim, 2020. "Cherry‐picking the Sustainable Development Goals: Goal prioritization by national governments and implications for global governance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1269-1278, September.
    19. Wenfei Luan & Ling Lu & Xin Li & Chunfeng Ma, 2018. "Integrating Extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test and Set Pair Analysis for Sustainable Development Evaluation from the View of Uncertainty Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Hui Li & Kangyin Dong & Renjin Sun & Jintao Yu & Jinhong Xu, 2017. "Sustainability Assessment of Refining Enterprises Using a DEA-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4380-:d:1084487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.