IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4215-d1081206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofuel Production Plant Location Selection Using Integrated Picture Fuzzy Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim M. Hezam

    (Department of Statistics & Operations Research, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fausto Cavallaro

    (Department of Economics, University of Molise, Via de Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Jyoti Lakshmi

    (Department of Computer Applications, Institute of Informatics & Management Sciences, Meerut 250004, India)

  • Pratibha Rani

    (Department of Engineering Mathematics, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram 522302, India)

  • Subhanshu Goyal

    (Department of Mathematics, Marwadi University, Rajkot 360003, India)

Abstract

As an alternative for sustainable transportation and economic development, biofuels are being promoted as renewable and climate-friendly resources of energy which can help to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, some pollutant emissions and mitigate the climate change impact from transport. With the successful development of the biofuel industry, the location selection for biofuel production plant is one of the major concerns for the governments and policymakers. Finding locations for the construction of new biofuel production plants includes several dimensions of sustainability, including economic, social and environmental; therefore, this selection process can be considered a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem with uncertainty. As an advanced version of fuzzy set, picture fuzzy set (PiFS) is one of the comprehensive tools to handle the uncertainty with the account of truth, abstinence and falsity membership degrees. Thus, this work proposes a new decision-making methodology based on the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) approach and similarity measure with picture fuzzy information. By using picture fuzzy numbers, the proposed methodology can effectively address the uncertain information and qualitative data that often occurs in practical applications. In this methodology, a picture fuzzy similarity measure-based weighting model is proposed to find the criteria weights under picture fuzzy environment. For this purpose, a new similarity measure is introduced to measure the degree of similarity between picture fuzzy numbers. Moreover, the rank of the options is determined based on an integrated WASPAS approach under a PiFS context. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, a case study of biofuel production plant location selection is presented from the picture fuzzy perspective. Further, a comparison with existing methods is conducted to test the validity and applicability of the obtained results. The sensitivity analysis is performed with respect to different values of decision parameter, which proves the stability, robustness, and practicality of the proposed approach. The presented picture fuzzy WASPAS approach feasibly enables the policymakers to identify the most desirable location for a biofuel production plant by considering the social, environmental and economic aspects of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim M. Hezam & Fausto Cavallaro & Jyoti Lakshmi & Pratibha Rani & Subhanshu Goyal, 2023. "Biofuel Production Plant Location Selection Using Integrated Picture Fuzzy Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4215-:d:1081206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bai, Yun & Hwang, Taesung & Kang, Seungmo & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 162-175, January.
    2. Yücenur, G. Nilay & Çaylak, Şeyma & Gönül, Gözde & Postalcıoğlu, Melike, 2020. "An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2587-2597.
    3. Cai, Wei & Li, Xing & Maleki, Akbar & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Rosen, Marc A. & Alhuyi Nazari, Mohammad & Bui, Dieu Tien, 2020. "Optimal sizing and location based on economic parameters for an off-grid application of a hybrid system with photovoltaic, battery and diesel technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Ida Nordin & Katarina Elofsson & Torbjörn Jansson, 2022. "Optimal localisation of agricultural biofuel production facilities and feedstock: a Swedish case study," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(4), pages 910-941.
    5. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani, 2018. "Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy WASPAS Method: Application in Reservoir Flood Control Management Policy," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1047-1078, December.
    6. Zhang, Ge & Shi, Yong & Maleki, Akbar & A. Rosen, Marc, 2020. "Optimal location and size of a grid-independent solar/hydrogen system for rural areas using an efficient heuristic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1203-1214.
    7. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    8. Duarte, Alexandra E. & Sarache, William A. & Costa, Yasel J., 2014. "A facility-location model for biofuel plants: Applications in the Colombian context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 476-483.
    9. Ng, Rex T.L. & Maravelias, Christos T., 2017. "Design of biofuel supply chains with variable regional depot and biorefinery locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 90-102.
    10. Najafi, Fatemeh & Sedaghat, Ahmad & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Issakhov, Alibek, 2021. "Location assessment for producing biodiesel fuel from Jatropha Curcas in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Syed Mithun Ali & Andrea Appolloni & Fausto Cavallaro & Idiano D’Adamo & Assunta Di Vaio & Francesco Ferella & Massimo Gastaldi & Muhammad Ikram & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Michael Alan Martin & Abdul, 2023. "Development Goals towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    2. Najafi, Fatemeh & Sedaghat, Ahmad & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Issakhov, Alibek, 2021. "Location assessment for producing biodiesel fuel from Jatropha Curcas in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Hossain, Tasmin & Jones, Daniela & Hartley, Damon & Griffel, L. Michael & Lin, Yingqian & Burli, Pralhad & Thompson, David N. & Langholtz, Matthew & Davis, Maggie & Brandt, Craig, 2021. "The nth-plant scenario for blended feedstock conversion and preprocessing nationwide: Biorefineries and depots," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    4. Thirunavukkarasu, M. & Sawle, Yashwant & Lala, Himadri, 2023. "A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems using various optimization techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    6. Cebi, Selcuk & Ilbahar, Esra & Atasoy, Aylin, 2016. "A fuzzy information axiom based method to determine the optimal location for a biomass power plant: A case study in Aegean Region of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 894-907.
    7. Luo, Xi & Liu, Yanfeng & Feng, Pingan & Gao, Yuan & Guo, Zhenxiang, 2021. "Optimization of a solar-based integrated energy system considering interaction between generation, network, and demand side," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    8. Khargotra, Rohit & Kumar, Raj & András, Kovács & Fekete, Gusztáv & Singh, Tej, 2022. "Thermo-hydraulic characterization and design optimization of delta-shaped obstacles in solar water heating system using CRITIC-COPRAS approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    9. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    12. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Zhou, Jianguo & Xu, Zhongtian, 2023. "Optimal sizing design and integrated cost-benefit assessment of stand-alone microgrid system with different energy storage employing chameleon swarm algorithm: A rural case in Northeast China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1110-1137.
    14. Farahani, Mohsen & Rahmani, Donya, 2017. "Production and distribution planning in petroleum supply chains regarding the impacts of gas injection and swap," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 991-1003.
    15. Roni, Md.S. & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Searcy, Erin & Jha, Krishna, 2014. "A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 115-134.
    16. Ana Rita Silva & Ana Estanqueiro, 2022. "From Wind to Hybrid: A Contribution to the Optimal Design of Utility-Scale Hybrid Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Davoudkhani, Iraj Faraji & Dejamkhooy, Abdolmajid & Nowdeh, Saber Arabi, 2023. "A novel cloud-based framework for optimal design of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system considering uncertainty and battery aging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    18. Andrzej Bochniak & Monika Stoma, 2021. "Estimating the Optimal Location for the Storage of Pellet Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Javed, Muhammad Shahzad & Ma, Tao & Jurasz, Jakub & Mikulik, Jerzy, 2021. "A hybrid method for scenario-based techno-economic-environmental analysis of off-grid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval & Sami Khanal & Ajay Shah, 2023. "Assessment of Potential Pennycress Availability and Suitable Sites for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refineries in Ohio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4215-:d:1081206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.