IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p3898-d1075462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Various Organic Amendment Sources to Improve the Root Yield and Sugar Contents of Sugar Beet Genotypes ( Beta vulgaris L.) under Arid Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ijaz

    (College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Sami Ul-Allah

    (College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Sattar

    (College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Ahmad Sher

    (College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Ijaz Hussain

    (College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Science, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan 66000, Pakistan)

  • Ahmad Nawaz

    (Center for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI), Central and West Asia (CWA), Satellite Town, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan)

Abstract

Sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) is a sucrose-rich tap root crop, with its fresh root containing up to 20% sucrose contents. Natural organic fertilizers can be a good alternative to synthetic fertilizers. For this purpose, an experiment was conducted for the optimization of different organic amendments i.e., farmyard manure, poultry manure, compost, and biochar. After the optimization experiment, pre-optimized doses of different organic amendments (farmyard manure, 40 t ha −1 ; poultry manure, 20 t ha −1 ; compost, 40 t ha −1 ; and biochar, 20 t ha −1 ) were evaluated for the production and root quality of two diverse sugar beet genotypes. The experiment was repeated over time (2019 and 2020) at four locations (BZU Research Farm Layyah, Farmer Field Layyah, Farmer Field Bhakkar-A and Farmer Field Bhakkar-B). Among different organic amendments, the use of an optimized rate of poultry manure (20 t ha −1 ) was the most useful for improvement in root yield, sugar yield and sugar quality. Improvement in root yield was attributed to better leaf growth and root yield which resulted eventually in higher reserve accumulation in roots. The performance of genotype ‘California’ was superior to the genotype ‘Serenada’. In conclusion, growing of genotype ‘California’ in sandy loam soils with poultry manure application (20 t ha −1 ) might be a pragmatic option to improve the sugar beet yield and sugar recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ijaz & Sami Ul-Allah & Abdul Sattar & Ahmad Sher & Ijaz Hussain & Ahmad Nawaz, 2023. "Evaluation of Various Organic Amendment Sources to Improve the Root Yield and Sugar Contents of Sugar Beet Genotypes ( Beta vulgaris L.) under Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:3898-:d:1075462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/3898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/3898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofia Hadir & Thomas Gaiser & Hubert Hüging & Miriam Athmann & Daniel Pfarr & Roman Kemper & Frank Ewert & Sabine Seidel, 2020. "Sugar Beet Shoot and Root Phenotypic Plasticity to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Lime Omission," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Ijaz & Sami Ul-Allah & Ahmad Sher & Abdul Sattar & Khalid Mahmood & Saud Alamri & Yasir Ali & Farhan Rafiq & Syed Muhammad Shaharyar & Bader Ijaz & Ijaz Hussain, 2023. "Boron Fertilization Alleviates the Adverse Effects of Late Sowing in Wheat under Different Tillage Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Matome J. Mokgolo & Jestinos Mzezewa & Mussie G. Zerizghy, 2024. "Investigating the Synergistic Effect of Tillage System and Manure Application Rates on Selected Properties of Two Soil Types in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Józef Tyburski & Mirosław Nowakowski & Robert Nelke & Marcin Żurek, 2024. "Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivana Varga & Zdenko Lončarić & Suzana Kristek & Antonela Markulj Kulundžić & Andrijana Rebekić & Manda Antunović, 2021. "Sugar Beet Root Yield and Quality with Leaf Seasonal Dynamics in Relation to Planting Densities and Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Xiangwen Xie & Qianqian Zhu & Yongmei Xu & Xiaopeng Ma & Feng Ding & Guangyong Li, 2022. "Potassium Determines Sugar Beets’ Yield and Sugar Content under Drip Irrigation Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:3898-:d:1075462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.