IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3331-d1065326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delivering Sustainable Housing through Material Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Taylor

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Krishanu Roy

    (School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand)

  • Aflah Alamsah Dani

    (School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand)

  • James B. P. Lim

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand)

  • Karnika De Silva

    (NZ Product Accelerator, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Mark Jones

    (NZ Product Accelerator, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

Abstract

Increasing importance is being placed on sustainability worldwide to limit climate change’s effects. In New Zealand, a sizeable increase in demand for housing is driving a residential construction boom, with new dwelling consents increasing yearly for the last decade. The New Zealand Government’s commitment to sustainability has become legislation through the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019. Therefore, the next stage is how the construction industry can limit and reduce its carbon emissions through one of the strategies, namely material choice. This study was intended to examine the influence of various building materials on climate change and to identify how more sustainable home construction and design in New Zealand may contribute to the government’s 2050 emissions reduction targets. A life-cycle assessment (LCA) was used in this study to investigate the global warming potential (GWP) produced by five case study houses and various material options for building envelope components. The study focused on the environmental impact of materials with high usage in industry and potential new materials that have shown an ability to conform to the New Zealand Building Code standards. It was found that case study House 1 (with timber flooring founded on senton piles with concrete footings, a timber frame, plywood wall cladding, and metal roof cladding) and House 2 (with a concrete waffle slab, a light steel frame, masonry wall cladding, and metal roof cladding) had the lowest GWP emissions compared to the other case study houses, with 631.13 and 633.16 kg CO 2 eq/m 2 , respectively. However, it should be noted that all the case study houses were not similar in size and design. In addition, the study investigated the different building envelope material options for the foundation, wall cladding, framing, and roof cladding. The study found that some new materials or materials that are not common in New Zealand could be used as an option for the housing envelope by having lower carbon emissions, such as 3D-printed concrete blocks compared with brick and concrete masonry for wall cladding systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Taylor & Krishanu Roy & Aflah Alamsah Dani & James B. P. Lim & Karnika De Silva & Mark Jones, 2023. "Delivering Sustainable Housing through Material Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3331-:d:1065326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petrovic, Bojana & Myhren, Jonn Are & Zhang, Xingxing & Wallhagen, Marita & Eriksson, Ola, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Roberto Giordano & Federica Gallina & Benedetta Quaglio, 2021. "Analysis and Assessment of the Building Life Cycle. Indicators and Tools for the Early Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Archer, David, 2023. "Transforming the financing of education at the mid-point of the sustainable development goals," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Bjelland, David & Brozovsky, Johannes & Hrynyszyn, Bozena Dorota, 2024. "Systematic review: Upscaling energy retrofitting to the multi-building level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Guisel Romero Quidel & Matías Javier Soto Acuña & Carlos Javier Rojas Herrera & Karin Rodríguez Neira & Juan Pablo Cárdenas-Ramírez, 2023. "Assessment of Modular Construction System Made with Low Environmental Impact Construction Materials for Achieving Sustainable Housing Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tihamér Tibor Sebestyén, 2024. "Evaluation of the Carbon Footprint of Wooden Glamping Structures by Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Zygmunt Stanula & Marek Wieruszewski & Adam Zydroń & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2023. "Optimizing Forest-Biomass-Distribution Logistics from a Multi-Level Perspective—Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Elżbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Dec, 2022. "Environmental Impact of Demolishing a Steel Structure Design for Disassembly," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Shan Dai & Wenfeng Bai & Jing Xiao, 2024. "Balancing Environmental Impact and Practicality: A Case Study on the Cement-Stabilized Rammed Earth Construction in Southeast Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Zhuyuan Xue & Hongbo Liu & Qinxiao Zhang & Jingxin Wang & Jilin Fan & Xia Zhou, 2019. "The Impact Assessment of Campus Buildings Based on a Life Cycle Assessment–Life Cycle Cost Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer & Elisabetta Palumbo & Carmen Llatas & Álvaro Velasco Acevedo & María Dolores Fernández Galvéz & Endrit Hoxha & Alexander Passer, 2023. "The Use of Environmental Product Declarations of Construction Products as a Data Source to Conduct a Building Life-Cycle Assessment in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Säwén, Toivo & Sasic Kalagasidis, Angela & Hollberg, Alexander, 2024. "Critical perspectives on life cycle building performance assessment tool reviews," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Bernard Zawada & Joanna Rucińska, 2021. "Optimization of Modernization of a Single-Family Building in Poland Including Thermal Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    10. Francesco Asdrubali & Luca Evangelisti & Claudia Guattari & Marta Roncone & Daniele Milone, 2023. "Experimental Analysis of the Thermal Performance of Wood Fiber Insulating Panels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Apostolopoulos, Vasilis & Mamounakis, Ioannis & Seitaridis, Andreas & Tagkoulis, Nikolas & Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios & Iliadis, Petros & Angelakoglou, Komninos & Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos, 2023. "Αn integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach towards sustainable building renovation via a dynamic online tool," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    12. Sam Hamels, 2021. "CO 2 Intensities and Primary Energy Factors in the Future European Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    13. Kai Kanafani & Jonathan Magnes & Søren Munch Lindhard & Maria Balouktsi, 2023. "Carbon Emissions during the Building Construction Phase: A Comprehensive Case Study of Construction Sites in Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Jaroslav Košičan & Miguel Ángel Pardo Picazo & Silvia Vilčeková & Danica Košičanová, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Energy Efficiency of a Solar Thermal Installation in a Family House," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Silvia Vilčeková & Katarína Harčárová & Andrea Moňoková & Eva Krídlová Burdová, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment and Indoor Environmental Quality of Wooden Family Houses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Hamels, Sam & Himpe, Eline & Laverge, Jelle & Delghust, Marc & Van den Brande, Kjartan & Janssens, Arnold & Albrecht, Johan, 2021. "The use of primary energy factors and CO2 intensities for electricity in the European context - A systematic methodological review and critical evaluation of the contemporary literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Ricardo Ramírez-Villegas & Ola Eriksson & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Environmental Payback of Renovation Strategies in a Northern Climate—the Impact of Nuclear Power and Fossil Fuels in the Electricity Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Hatem Alhazmi & Abdulilah K. Alduwais & Thamer Tabbakh & Saad Aljamlani & Bandar Alkahlan & Abdulaziz Kurdi, 2021. "Environmental Performance of Residential Buildings: A Life Cycle Assessment Study in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3331-:d:1065326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.