IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3324-d1065238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Foods

Author

Listed:
  • Alissa A. Nolden

    (Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA)

  • Ciarán G. Forde

    (Sensory Science and Eating Behaviour, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

There is growing interest in the adoption of a more sustainable diet, and this has led to the development of plant-derived alternative products that are used as a substitute for products of animal origin. This is a promising way to improve the sustainability of the agricultural food industry; however, there are increasing concerns regarding the nutritional profile of plant-based products, with emerging evidence that many are not nutritionally equivalent to conventional animal products. In this study, we provide a narrative review focusing on the nutritional quality of plant-based alternative products. First, we summarize the available literature examining consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ perceived healthfulness and nutritional concerns regarding plant-based foods. Then, we compare the nutritional composition (macro- and micronutrients) of plant-based alternatives to their conventional animal counterparts. Moreover, we outline the potential impact of these nutritional differences on overall diet quality and provide a summary of the differences in the digestibility and bioavailability of nutrients from plant and animal sources. We highlight the role of product development and innovations in food processing to support the nutritional composition of plant-based products and outline the priorities for more comprehensive research on the nutrient density of these products and the sustained effect of modern plant-derived diets on long-term health.

Suggested Citation

  • Alissa A. Nolden & Ciarán G. Forde, 2023. "The Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3324-:d:1065238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annika Carlsson Kanyama & Björn Hedin & Cecilia Katzeff, 2021. "Differences in Environmental Impact between Plant-Based Alternatives to Dairy and Dairy Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Madeline Estell & Jaimee Hughes & Sara Grafenauer, 2021. "Plant Protein and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Consumer and Nutrition Professional Attitudes and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Vrenna & Pier Paolo Peruccio & Xin Liu & Fang Zhong & Yuchi Sun, 2021. "Microalgae as Future Superfoods: Fostering Adoption through Practice-Based Design Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Olha Bordunova & Tetyana Golovko & Mykola Golovko & Yevheniia Samokhina & Olha Vasilenko & Vladyslav Prymenko & Natalia Bolgova & Olena Koshel & Daria Oliinyk, 2023. "Low-gluten shortbread enriched with sweet potato powder (Ipomoea batatas var. Portu Orange): quality and texture indicators," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(3(71)), pages 46-51, June.
    3. David Kilian & Ulrich Hamm, 2021. "Perceptions of Vegan Food among Organic Food Consumers Following Different Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Steffen Jahn & Pia Furchheim & Anna-Maria Strässner, 2021. "Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Motivational Adoption Barriers and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Rizal Edy Halim & Shinta Rahmani & Gita Gayatri & Asnan Furinto & Yudi Sutarso, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Product Sustainability Claims to Mitigate Negative Electronic Word of Mouth (N-eWOM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Ang, Ming Yang Avon & Pontes, Nicolas & France, Cassandra, 2024. "Unsustainable burgers? Deploying carbon footprint labels to enhance sustainability perceptions of animal-based food products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3324-:d:1065238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.