IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v3y2023i3p46-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-gluten shortbread enriched with sweet potato powder (Ipomoea batatas var. Portu Orange): quality and texture indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Olha Bordunova

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Tetyana Golovko

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Mykola Golovko

    (State Biotechnological University)

  • Yevheniia Samokhina

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Olha Vasilenko

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Vladyslav Prymenko

    (Dnipro Faculty of Management and Business of Kyiv University of Culture)

  • Natalia Bolgova

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Olena Koshel

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

  • Daria Oliinyk

    (Sumy National Agrarian University)

Abstract

The chemical composition of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas var. Portu Orange), grown in Ukraine, was studied to determine its potential in shortbread technology. Portu Orange sweet potato has a high content of starch (11.2 %), natural sugars (4.7 %), dietary fiber (3.8 %) and food pigments. To obtain the highest quality characteristics and preserve the antioxidant properties of sweet potato during drying, an innovative microwave vacuum drying method was used. This allowed us to produce Portu Orange sweet potato powder with a high content of starch (43 %), natural sugars (18 %), dietary fibre (14.6 %) and preservation of food colouring properties. According to organoleptic parameters, Portu Orange sweet potato has an orange color, which was formed with a combination of anthocyanin pigmentation of the skin (orange) and β-carotene pigmentation of the flesh (light orange). In shortbread technology, Portu Orange sweet potato is used in powder form, which is an alternative to starch, sugar, orange food colorings, gluten-containing cereals and egg products. Portu Orange sweet potato powder was added to the shortbread recipe in the amount of 38 % to completely replace sugar and chicken eggs. The wheat flour in the recipe was replaced by 80 % low-gluten wheat flour and 20 % sweet potato powder. Compared to regular shortbread, the protein content increased by 24.3 % to 9.2 g/100 g, the dietary fiber content increased by 74.6 % to 10.3 g/100 g, and the ash content increased by 155.6 % to 2.3 g/100 g. The fat content of shortbread with sweet potato powder was reduced by 7.5 %, the carbohydrate content was reduced by 11.5 % and the energy value was reduced by 8 % to 407.8 kcal/100 g. Texture parameters were improved, making shortbread with sweet potato powder less hard, the hardness was reduced by 48 %, but at the same time the fracturability indicators were maintained, the fracturability was reduced by only 2 %, compared to the regular shortbread, which made it more acceptable to consumers. The obtained changes in the nutritional value of the shortbread, the improvement of the texture, the reduction of the gluten content and the presence of a high amount of biologically active substances confirm the effectiveness of using Portu Orange sweet potato powder for dietary low-gluten nutrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Olha Bordunova & Tetyana Golovko & Mykola Golovko & Yevheniia Samokhina & Olha Vasilenko & Vladyslav Prymenko & Natalia Bolgova & Olena Koshel & Daria Oliinyk, 2023. "Low-gluten shortbread enriched with sweet potato powder (Ipomoea batatas var. Portu Orange): quality and texture indicators," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(3(71)), pages 46-51, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2023:i:3:p:46-51
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2023.283629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/download/283629/278181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.283629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeline Estell & Jaimee Hughes & Sara Grafenauer, 2021. "Plant Protein and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Consumer and Nutrition Professional Attitudes and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Vrenna & Pier Paolo Peruccio & Xin Liu & Fang Zhong & Yuchi Sun, 2021. "Microalgae as Future Superfoods: Fostering Adoption through Practice-Based Design Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Ang, Ming Yang Avon & Pontes, Nicolas & France, Cassandra, 2024. "Unsustainable burgers? Deploying carbon footprint labels to enhance sustainability perceptions of animal-based food products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Alissa A. Nolden & Ciarán G. Forde, 2023. "The Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. David Kilian & Ulrich Hamm, 2021. "Perceptions of Vegan Food among Organic Food Consumers Following Different Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Steffen Jahn & Pia Furchheim & Anna-Maria Strässner, 2021. "Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Motivational Adoption Barriers and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2023:i:3:p:46-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.